Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove experimental chalk option - #69247
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Feb 17, 2020
r? @cramertj (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
FWIW, I've gotten (locally) the Chalk-related code updated to the latest Chalk master (with some modifications that'll get PRed soon). It compiles but |
CAD97
commented
Feb 18, 2020
Just for good measure, I suppose I should cc @rust-lang/wg-traits |
cramertj
commented
Feb 18, 2020
bors
commented
Feb 22, 2020
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #69242) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
nikomatsakis
commented
Mar 2, 2020
bors
commented
Mar 2, 2020
✌️ @CAD97 can now approve this pull request |
CAD97
commented
Mar 2, 2020
Rebased. If only GitHub actually had a way to show just the conflict resolution of the rebase... @bors r=nikomatsakis |
bors
commented
Mar 2, 2020
📌 Commit 02b872ed51d74eb48b07e5dd7b15d51636bf7e76 has been approved by |
@bors r- Tidy failures crept into the rebase; investigating |
CAD97
commented
Mar 2, 2020
@bors: r=nikomatsakis I missed a trailing newline, that's it. |
bors
commented
Mar 2, 2020
📌 Commit b3777c9 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Mar 3, 2020
bors
commented
Mar 3, 2020
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Removed in rust-lang#69247 while this PR was waiting to merge.
As suggested by @nikomatsakishere.
The current version of chalk used by the experimental
-Zchalkflag is v0.9.0, which is over a year old. Since v0.9.0, chalk has seen a lot of further development, and the intent is to eventually upgrade rustc to use a more recent chalk.However, it will take a decent chunk of effort to upgrade the current experimental chalk support, and it is currently blocking at least some PRs due to chalk:0.9.0's use of unstable features. So for the interim until the next chalk release and experimental rustc integration, we remove the chalk-specific code from rustc.