Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-14894][PySpark] Add result summary api to Gaussian Mixture - #12675
[SPARK-14894][PySpark] Add result summary api to Gaussian Mixture#12675GayathriMurali wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
GayathriMurali
commented
Apr 26, 2016
@wangmiao1981@jkbradley Please help review this PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PyDoc seems oddly formatted in terms of line breaks.
f3114ed to
11f0574CompareGayathriMurali
commented
Apr 28, 2016
@jkbradley Can you please ok to test this |
GayathriMurali
commented
May 6, 2016
@holdenk I fixed the pydoc style issue. Can you please help review this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this also seems strangely formatted - did you mean trainingSummary is None. ?
holdenk
commented
May 9, 2016
So did a quick look and it seems like it might not be lining up with the Scala implementation (or I just haven't had enough coffee this morning). It might be worthwhile to doublecheck against the scaladoc and also run your tests locally if you haven't done that. |
GayathriMurali
commented
May 12, 2016
@holdenk I checked the ScalaDoc and removed the evaluate method. Thanks for pointing it out. Can you please help review |
GayathriMurali
commented
Jun 7, 2016
@jkbradley@holdenk Can you please help review? |
GayathriMurali
commented
Jun 14, 2016
@jkbradley This PR has been open >30days. Can you please help review? |
MLnick
commented
Jun 17, 2016
ok to test |
SparkQA
commented
Jun 17, 2016
Test build #60707 has finished for PR 12675 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jun 18, 2016
Test build #60739 has finished for PR 12675 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jun 18, 2016
Test build #60748 has finished for PR 12675 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jun 19, 2016
Test build #60820 has finished for PR 12675 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Jun 19, 2016
Test build #60821 has finished for PR 12675 at commit
|
| def test_gaussian_mixture_summary(self): | ||
| from pyspark.mllib.linalg import Vectors | ||
| df = self.spark.read.format("libsvm").load("data/mllib/sample_kmeans_data.txt") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please let me know if its ok to load data from a file when all other test cases uses hard coded data values. I tried with a sparse vector and fit gave me an error for the data format.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think its ok to load a dataset which is already used for testing else where.
GayathriMurali
commented
Jun 21, 2016
@MLnick It would be great if you can help review this. |
holdenk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you still interested in this PR @GayathriMurali ? If you've got the time to look at some of my notes around the PyDocs that would be cool - but we can also try pinging @davies & @MLnick to see if they are available to review once those comments are looked at :)
| return self._call_java("gaussiansDF") | ||
| @property | ||
| @since("2.0.0") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since we've shipped 2.0 we will need to update this to 2.1 (same with the versionAdded notes)
HyukjinKwon
commented
Feb 9, 2017
Hi @GayathriMurali, it seems inactive for the review comments for few months. Should this be better closed for now if you are not able to proceed this further? |
wangmiao1981
commented
Feb 9, 2017
@GayathriMurali If you are not able to proceed, I can take over. Thanks! |
wangmiao1981
commented
Feb 15, 2017
#15777 has resolved this issue. We should close this one. |
wangmiao1981
commented
Feb 15, 2017
@HyukjinKwon@srowen This should be closed. Thanks! |
HyukjinKwon
commented
Feb 15, 2017
@wangmiao1981 Wow, thank you for your efforts to verify it! |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to close stale PRs. What I mean by "stale" here includes that there are some review comments by reviewers but the author looks inactive without any answer to them more than a month. I left some comments roughly a week ago to ping and the author looks still inactive in these PR below These below includes some PR suggested to be closed and a PR against another branch which seems obviously inappropriate. Given the comments in the last three PRs below, they are probably worth being taken over by anyone who is interested in it. Closesapache#7963Closesapache#8374Closesapache#11192Closesapache#11374Closesapache#11692Closesapache#12243Closesapache#12583Closesapache#12620Closesapache#12675Closesapache#12697Closesapache#12800Closesapache#13715Closesapache#14266Closesapache#15053Closesapache#15159Closesapache#15209Closesapache#15264Closesapache#15267Closesapache#15871Closesapache#15861Closesapache#16319Closesapache#16324Closesapache#16890Closesapache#12398Closesapache#12933Closesapache#14517 ## How was this patch tested? N/A Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com> Closesapache#16937 from HyukjinKwon/stale-prs-close.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add summary API to Gaussian Mixture
How was this patch tested?
Added unit test case to test summary information