Skip to content

Add CODEOWNERS reviewers - #61

Merged
baxen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codeowners
Sep 14, 2026
Merged

baxen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codeowners

Conversation

@baxen

@baxen baxen commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • add @comp615 as a default code owner
  • add @block/buzz-oss-team as a default code owner
  • retain the existing @wesbillman owner

Validation

  • verified the GitHub user and team exist
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
  • pre-commit and pre-push hooks passed
  • source builds and tests not run (CODEOWNERS-only change)

Signed-off-by: Bradley Axen <baxen@squareup.com>
@baxen
baxen requested a review from wesbillman as a code owner September 14, 2026 18:40
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-14T18:42:38.758106Z 30a5f21 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@baxen
baxen merged commit 92e1e94 into main Sep 14, 2026
9 checks passed
@baxen
baxen deleted the codeowners branch September 14, 2026 18:41

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 30a5f21ee3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CODEOWNERS

# These owners will be the default owners for everything in the repo.
* @wesbillman
* @wesbillman @comp615 @block/buzz-oss-team

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Add the missing DCO sign-off

The reviewed commit contains no Signed-off-by trailer, so this CODEOWNERS-only change does not satisfy the repository's DCO requirement and cannot pass the required DCO check. Recreate the commit with the author's verified name/email and --signoff before integration.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L79-L84

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

delkc added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2026
* origin/main:
  Fix inline mention styling in channels (#74)
  Fix self-replenishing background channel warming (#71)
  Add links and thread previews (#42)
  Add shared receive-only channel and thread typing (#33)
  Warm channel heads in the background before they are opened (#54)
  Add Developer settings tab with cache clear and broker stats (#53)
  Request sized relay media for avatars (#58)
  Allow parallel browser development ports (#57)
  Add worktree bootstrap for local configuration (#56)
  Make thread opens part of navigation history (#55)
  Remove the decoded-avatar hot set; respect Save-Data (#60)
  Add CODEOWNERS reviewers (#61)
  Add guarded Workflows page and session capability (#48)

Signed-off-by: Clay Delk <clay.delk@gmail.com>

# Conflicts:
#	dev/relay-broker.mjs
#	src/bundled/channels/ChannelsPage.tsx
#	src/features/messages/ChannelTimeline.tsx
#	src/features/messages/MessageComposer.tsx
#	src/features/messages/MessageRow.tsx
#	src/features/messages/ThreadPanel.test.tsx
#	src/features/messages/ThreadPanel.tsx
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant