Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Oct 8, 2019
I'm going to @bors r+ rollup I think other repositories can do this if they want, I'm not personally intending to approve those PRs if you file them as it's out of my purview :) |
bors
commented
Oct 8, 2019
📌 Commit 45835e9 has been approved by |
…crum Replace code of conduct with link This will replace the code of conduct and link to a single version at https://www.rust-lang.org/conduct.htmlFixesrust-lang#61531 (comment) r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #64284 (Warn if include macro fails to include entire file) - #65081 (Remove -Zprofile-queries) - #65133 (typeck: prohibit foreign statics w/ generics) - #65135 (Add check for missing tests for error codes) - #65141 (Replace code of conduct with link) - #65194 (Use structured suggestion for removal of `as_str()` call) - #65213 (Ignore `ExprKind::DropTemps` for some ref suggestions) Failed merges: r? @ghost
therealprof
commented
Oct 9, 2019
You've removed the contact link to the responsible team, is that intended (i.e. is the Rust Moderation team responsible for handling CoC violations globally for all Rust initiatives)? |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Oct 9, 2019
No - I thought the text was the same between the website and this file. We should update the website if that's not the case. |
therealprof
commented
Oct 9, 2019
In this particular case that's correct but the other books mentioned may have different contacts, at least the embedded book does for sure. By simply pointing to the code of conduct site, visitors will only see the referrals to the Rust Moderation team in various places. |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Oct 9, 2019
Not sure I follow you. If I'm understanding, that's one reason why I did not note here that making this change elsewhere may not be as clear-cut and I would not be able to approve it elsewhere. |
therealprof
commented
Oct 9, 2019
I had the impression that you suggested that other repositories are invited to make the same change when you said:
which stimulated my curiosity about whether the moderation team is willing to take the lead on handling CoC topics and complaints globally. |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Oct 9, 2019
Oh. I did not (and do not intend) to suggest any change to moderation team policies. I believe, but do not consider this official word, that we do not intend the moderation team to get involved in any non-official places (rust-lang org, and projects under it, are official places, I believe). |
therealprof
commented
Oct 9, 2019
Thanks for the clarification. |
This change is to be consistent with [rust-lang/rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust). Their change was made in October 2019. The PR over there: [Replace code of conduct with link #65141](rust-lang/rust#65141)
This change is to be consistent with rust-lang/rust. Their change was made in December 2019. The PR over there: [Remove appendix from LICENCE-APACHE](rust-lang/rust#65141)
This change is to be consistent with rust-lang/rust. Their change was made in October 2019. The PR over there: [Replace code of conduct with link #65141](rust-lang/rust#65141)
This change is to be consistent with rust-lang/rust. Their change was made in December 2019. The PR over there: [Remove appendix from LICENCE-APACHE](rust-lang/rust#65141)
This change is to be consistent with rust-lang/rust. Their change was made in October 2019. The PR over there: [Replace code of conduct with link #65141](rust-lang/rust#65141)
This change is to be consistent with rust-lang/rust. Their change was made in December 2019. The PR over there: [Remove appendix from LICENCE-APACHE](rust-lang/rust#65141)
This change is to be consistent with rust-lang/rust. Their change was made in October 2019. The PR over there: [Replace code of conduct with link #65141](rust-lang/rust#65141)
Replace rustfmt code of conduct with link In rust-lang#65141 we replaced the CoC file and linked the "authoritative source" on the website. I noticed that the rustfmt directory still has the CoC original file. I *think* for consistency it makes sense to have all of them linked but I'd like to hear from @calebcartwright first :-) r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Rollup merge of #156879 - apiraino:link-coc-rustfmt, r=ytmimi Replace rustfmt code of conduct with link In #65141 we replaced the CoC file and linked the "authoritative source" on the website. I noticed that the rustfmt directory still has the CoC original file. I *think* for consistency it makes sense to have all of them linked but I'd like to hear from @calebcartwright first :-) r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Replace rustfmt code of conduct with link In rust-lang/rust#65141 we replaced the CoC file and linked the "authoritative source" on the website. I noticed that the rustfmt directory still has the CoC original file. I *think* for consistency it makes sense to have all of them linked but I'd like to hear from @calebcartwright first :-) r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Replace rustfmt code of conduct with link In rust-lang/rust#65141 we replaced the CoC file and linked the "authoritative source" on the website. I noticed that the rustfmt directory still has the CoC original file. I *think* for consistency it makes sense to have all of them linked but I'd like to hear from @calebcartwright first :-) r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Replace rustfmt code of conduct with link In rust-lang/rust#65141 we replaced the CoC file and linked the "authoritative source" on the website. I noticed that the rustfmt directory still has the CoC original file. I *think* for consistency it makes sense to have all of them linked but I'd like to hear from @calebcartwright first :-) r? @Mark-Simulacrum
This will replace the code of conduct and link to a single version at https://www.rust-lang.org/conduct.html
Fixes#61531 (comment)
r? @Mark-Simulacrum