Skip to content

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) - #2395

Merged
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#2395
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygppranaygp commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Must be backported to stable (4.x) post-merge

This PR must be backported to the stable branch after merge. The stable (4.x) branch carries the identical esbuild: ^0.27.3 catalog entry and the same packages/builders consumer, so it is affected by the same advisory. The included changeset uses a patch bump precisely so the backport publishes a 4.x patch release. If the automated backport action declines or conflicts, force it via workflow_dispatch on .github/workflows/backport.yml.

Resolves Linear VULN-11749.

What this fixes

Socket / GitHub advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr"Missing binary integrity verification … enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY" (High, CVSS 8.1). Affected range >= 0.17.0 < 0.28.1; fixed in 0.28.1.

This bumps the pnpm catalog entry for esbuild from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1. Every workspace package that depends on esbuild references it via catalog:@workflow/builders, @workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root dev dependency — so the single catalog change propagates to all of them, and the flagged direct dependency in packages/builders now resolves to 0.28.1.

Honest risk assessment

The advisory is real and correctly flagged, but the exploitable code path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts downloaded the native binary without SHA-256 verification when NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY is set). The Node.js install path already verified integrity, and this repo is a Node.js/pnpm project that never uses esbuild's Deno distribution — so practical exploitability here is low. Regardless, 0.27.7 is in the affected npm range, it's a direct dependency of packages/builders, and the remediation is free, so upgrading is correct and clears the alert. (esbuild 0.28.0/0.28.1 exist specifically to add these integrity checks.)

Transitive esbuild copies (why some 0.27.7 remains)

0.27.7 still appears transitively under build-time-only dev tooling in the example workbenches (vite, astro, fumadocs). I tried both ways to remove it:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet: vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) pins ^0.27.3, both excluding 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as breaking). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this.
  2. Force a pnpm override — unifies everything on 0.28.1, but breaks @workflow/web's build (react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with "Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment … is not supported yet" on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine). Reverted.

Since the vuln path is Deno-only and these are build-time dev tooling, the residual risk is negligible. They'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges. (Re-resolving did drop the redundant 0.28.0 — nitropack consolidated onto 0.28.1.)

CI: minimumReleaseAge fix

The canary E2E jobs run pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (they mutate the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hit the workspace's 48h minimumReleaseAge gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1 (ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION). Fixed by adding esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude — pnpm's recommended remedy, consistent with the existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions. --frozen-lockfile jobs (Build Packages, stable E2E) were unaffected and already passed.

Changes

  • pnpm-workspace.yaml: esbuild catalog ^0.27.3^0.28.1; add esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: re-resolved esbuild graph to 0.28.1 (diff scoped entirely to esbuild + @esbuild/*)
  • .changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.md: patch bump for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli

Verification

  • @workflow/builders builds and all 170 tests pass against 0.28.1 (exercises the esbuild.build() API directly).
  • @workflow/web builds cleanly (confirming the override revert).
  • pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (the canary install mode) now completes with no age-gate error and a stable lockfile.
  • esbuild changelog confirms no JS API signature changes in 0.28.x — only install-time integrity checks plus minor codegen fixes.

Note: the only currently-failing check, E2E Vercel Prod Tests (fastify), is an unrelated flaky abort test (AbortController > abortFromStepWorkflow, 119 passed / 1 failed) — a distributed-abort timing test against a live preview, not affected by an esbuild version bump.

Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2026 06:06
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 13, 2026 06:06
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 991f628

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.040s (-10.1% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.965s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.044s (~)1.007s (~)0.962s101.10x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.053s (-16.4% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.960s101.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.054s (-13.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.952s101.35x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.065s (-2.3%)1.012s (~)0.947s101.61x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.068s (+1.6%)1.012s (~)0.944s101.69x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.269s (-55.9% 🟢)2.408s (-2.5%)2.139s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro0.409s (+14.3% 🔺)2.538s (-2.1%)2.129s101.52x
▲ VercelExpress0.450s (+48.3% 🔺)2.745s (+24.2% 🔺)2.295s101.67x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.091s (~)2.006s (~)0.915s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.101s (~)2.007s (~)0.906s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.106s (~)2.011s (~)0.905s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.106s (~)2.013s (~)0.907s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.113s (-2.6%)2.006s (~)0.893s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.148s (+0.6%)2.010s (~)0.862s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.681s (-21.9% 🟢)3.444s (-14.2% 🟢)1.763s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress1.755s (+1.1%)4.086s (+23.8% 🔺)2.331s101.04x
▲ VercelNitro1.836s (+4.1%)3.705s (-4.0%)1.868s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.508s (~)11.022s (~)0.514s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.555s (~)11.017s (~)0.462s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.560s (~)11.023s (~)0.462s31.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.656s (-1.1%)11.023s (~)0.367s31.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.749s (+1.9%)11.020s (~)0.272s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.869s (~)11.018s (~)0.150s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro15.115s (+8.2% 🔺)17.194s (+9.2% 🔺)2.079s21.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)15.331s (+5.8% 🔺)16.760s (+3.3%)1.429s21.01x
▲ VercelExpress15.575s (+7.8% 🔺)17.240s (+12.0% 🔺)1.664s21.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro13.692s (~)14.027s (~)0.335s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.801s (~)14.028s (~)0.227s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.962s (~)14.221s (+1.4%)0.258s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.107s (-1.7%)15.030s (~)0.923s41.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.120s (+2.2%)14.626s (+4.3%)0.506s51.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.580s (+1.2%)15.024s (~)0.444s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express25.201s (+23.3% 🔺)27.562s (+25.7% 🔺)2.361s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro26.340s (+8.1% 🔺)27.894s (+6.3% 🔺)1.555s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)27.027s (+24.1% 🔺)28.718s (+18.1% 🔺)1.692s31.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro12.423s (-1.6%)13.017s (~)0.594s71.00x
💻 LocalExpress12.571s (~)13.026s (~)0.455s71.01x
💻 LocalNitro12.685s (+2.5%)13.170s (+1.1%)0.485s71.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.985s (-6.1% 🟢)13.310s (-6.1% 🟢)0.326s71.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.748s (+9.3% 🔺)14.162s (+8.8% 🔺)0.414s71.11x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.760s (-2.2%)14.018s (-3.9%)0.258s71.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro35.523s (+20.3% 🔺)38.316s (+18.5% 🔺)2.793s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress37.263s (+11.1% 🔺)39.690s (+13.4% 🔺)2.427s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)39.355s (+22.5% 🔺)41.407s (+24.6% 🔺)2.052s31.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.193s (-2.4%)2.007s (~)0.814s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.205s (-0.5%)2.008s (~)0.803s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.207s (-5.4% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.799s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.230s (+3.8%)2.006s (~)0.776s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s (-7.8% 🟢)2.005s (~)0.747s151.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.267s (-3.1%)2.008s (~)0.741s151.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.329s (+4.2%)3.867s (+6.1% 🔺)1.538s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.425s (-41.9% 🟢)4.077s (-27.4% 🟢)1.652s81.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.689s (-5.3% 🟢)4.438s (+3.5%)1.749s71.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.394s (-2.0%)2.269s (+5.5% 🔺)0.875s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.431s (+1.2%)2.318s (-3.1%)0.887s131.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.540s (-2.6%)2.223s (-4.1%)0.683s141.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.716s (-2.5%)2.006s (-6.8% 🟢)0.290s151.23x
💻 LocalNitro1.761s (~)2.006s (-3.2%)0.245s151.26x
💻 LocalExpress1.991s (-3.5%)2.394s (-4.6%)0.403s131.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.210s (-44.7% 🟢)5.076s (-29.4% 🟢)1.866s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro3.399s (+21.7% 🔺)4.984s (+15.1% 🔺)1.585s71.06x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.466s (+42.0% 🔺)6.037s (+31.9% 🔺)1.571s51.39x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.815s (+11.7% 🔺)3.887s (-6.0% 🟢)2.073s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.971s (+20.9% 🔺)3.583s (-10.7% 🟢)1.612s91.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.544s (+10.2% 🔺)4.268s (+6.3% 🔺)0.724s81.95x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.335s (-6.3% 🟢)5.011s (~)0.676s62.39x
💻 LocalNitro4.920s (+9.3% 🔺)5.349s (+3.2%)0.428s62.71x
💻 LocalExpress5.499s (-2.7%)6.214s (+3.3%)0.716s53.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.535s (+13.5% 🔺)5.797s (+26.3% 🔺)2.261s61.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.951s (-33.5% 🟢)5.513s (-25.4% 🟢)1.562s61.12x
▲ VercelNitro4.368s (+9.6% 🔺)6.104s (+2.8%)1.736s61.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.199s (-1.5%)2.008s (~)0.809s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.289s (+5.3% 🔺)2.009s (~)0.720s151.08x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.307s (+1.2%)2.007s (~)0.700s151.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.349s (-0.9%)2.006s (~)0.657s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.458s (-5.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.550s151.22x
💻 LocalExpress1.587s (+2.6%)2.007s (~)0.419s151.32x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.356s (-28.1% 🟢)4.014s (-19.9% 🟢)1.658s81.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.775s (-28.5% 🟢)4.260s (-17.6% 🟢)1.485s81.18x
▲ VercelExpress3.065s (+10.2% 🔺)4.878s (+18.3% 🔺)1.813s71.30x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.437s (+6.6% 🔺)2.230s (+3.6%)0.793s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s (~)2.141s (~)0.608s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.582s (+10.8% 🔺)2.675s (+20.3% 🔺)1.093s121.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.943s (-5.4% 🟢)2.292s (-18.9% 🟢)0.349s141.35x
💻 LocalNitro2.132s (+17.7% 🔺)2.591s (+16.5% 🔺)0.459s121.48x
💻 LocalExpress2.387s (+10.8% 🔺)2.918s (+12.5% 🔺)0.530s111.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.924s (-26.1% 🟢)4.803s (-14.4% 🟢)1.879s71.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.955s (-50.8% 🟢)4.728s (-37.3% 🟢)1.773s71.01x
▲ VercelExpress3.141s (-58.4% 🟢)5.306s (-40.3% 🟢)2.166s61.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.595s (-4.5%)3.766s (-12.5% 🟢)2.172s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.690s (-18.0% 🟢)3.761s (-9.2% 🟢)2.072s81.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.109s (+24.6% 🔺)5.013s (+24.9% 🔺)0.904s62.58x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.723s (-6.2% 🟢)5.343s (-3.1%)0.620s62.96x
💻 LocalNitro5.876s (+8.2% 🔺)6.418s (+9.7% 🔺)0.542s53.68x
💻 LocalExpress6.316s (+3.6%)6.819s (+3.1%)0.503s53.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.333s (-48.9% 🟢)5.237s (-36.0% 🟢)1.903s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.018s (-61.0% 🟢)5.716s (-51.8% 🟢)1.697s61.21x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.668s (+42.9% 🔺)6.481s (+33.7% 🔺)1.814s51.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.588s (~)1.005s (~)0.417s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.614s (+6.1% 🔺)1.059s (+5.2% 🔺)0.445s571.04x
💻 LocalExpress0.652s (+6.9% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.353s601.11x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.703s (-19.4% 🟢)1.022s (-1.7%)0.318s591.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.732s (+29.2% 🔺)1.129s (+12.2% 🔺)0.397s541.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.856s (+6.3% 🔺)1.040s (+3.4%)0.184s581.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.697s (-8.5% 🟢)6.481s (-7.1% 🟢)1.784s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.010s (-5.1% 🟢)6.696s (-0.8%)1.686s91.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.418s (+6.4% 🔺)7.228s (+5.5% 🔺)1.810s91.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.339s (-4.5%)2.030s (+1.1%)0.690s451.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.513s (+0.7%)2.006s (~)0.493s451.13x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.604s (+10.8% 🔺)2.132s (+3.9%)0.528s431.20x
💻 LocalExpress1.616s (+6.1% 🔺)2.007s (~)0.391s451.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.676s (-21.3% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.331s451.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.968s (+3.0%)2.251s (+8.5% 🔺)0.283s411.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro12.141s (-13.4% 🟢)13.695s (-16.0% 🟢)1.554s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress12.341s (~)14.549s (+2.4%)2.209s71.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.105s (-20.0% 🟢)15.264s (-15.8% 🟢)2.159s61.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.703s (-1.2%)3.111s (+2.6%)0.408s391.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.806s (+1.7%)3.404s (+8.5% 🔺)0.598s361.04x
💻 LocalNitro3.335s (+3.5%)3.976s (-0.8%)0.641s311.23x
💻 LocalExpress3.419s (+3.0%)4.042s (+0.8%)0.624s301.26x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.625s (-16.6% 🟢)4.042s (-19.3% 🟢)0.417s301.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.859s (-0.6%)4.076s (-2.5%)0.217s301.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro23.984s (-22.3% 🟢)25.857s (-21.4% 🟢)1.873s51.00x
▲ VercelExpress24.791s (-9.0% 🟢)27.182s (-5.7% 🟢)2.391s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)26.311s (-12.0% 🟢)28.173s (-11.5% 🟢)1.862s51.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.240s (-4.6%)1.006s (~)0.767s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.297s (-3.5%)1.006s (-1.7%)0.709s601.24x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.363s (+45.0% 🔺)1.022s (+1.6%)0.659s591.51x
💻 LocalNitro0.435s (+9.3% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.569s601.82x
💻 LocalExpress0.444s (+13.4% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.561s601.85x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.551s (-4.6%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.470s592.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.000s (+6.1% 🔺)3.453s (-16.4% 🟢)1.453s181.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.020s (-11.6% 🟢)3.965s (+1.1%)1.945s161.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.085s (-15.6% 🟢)3.906s (-4.1%)1.821s161.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.391s (-7.3% 🟢)1.028s (-3.4%)0.638s881.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.470s (+12.5% 🔺)1.053s (+1.2%)0.583s861.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.562s (+1.7%)1.066s (+1.2%)0.504s851.44x
💻 LocalExpress2.144s (-0.9%)2.737s (+0.8%)0.593s335.49x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.284s (-6.5% 🟢)2.977s (-6.5% 🟢)0.693s315.85x
💻 LocalNitro2.295s (+8.3% 🔺)2.912s (+9.6% 🔺)0.617s315.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.518s (-9.1% 🟢)4.300s (+0.7%)1.782s211.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.698s (~)4.162s (-6.3% 🟢)1.464s221.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.065s (+6.4% 🔺)4.810s (+8.8% 🔺)1.745s191.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.763s (-9.1% 🟢)1.270s (-16.5% 🟢)0.507s951.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.830s (+2.2%)1.366s (-13.9% 🟢)0.536s881.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.700s (+4.0%)3.575s (+3.9%)0.875s343.54x
💻 LocalNitro9.704s (+3.8%)10.111s (+1.6%)0.408s1212.72x
💻 LocalExpress9.919s (+1.2%)10.446s (+0.8%)0.526s1213.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s (+5.0% 🔺)11.577s (+5.0%)0.921s1113.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express6.128s (-22.0% 🟢)7.798s (-15.6% 🟢)1.670s161.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.371s (~)7.949s (-5.1% 🟢)1.578s161.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.568s (-14.7% 🟢)8.365s (-10.3% 🟢)1.797s151.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.162s (-0.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (-7.7% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.850s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.163s (~)2.005s (~)0.011s (+6.1% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.854s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.168s (-3.3%)2.003s (~)0.010s (-2.9%)2.017s (~)0.849s101.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.171s (~)2.005s (~)0.013s (+2.4%)2.020s (~)0.849s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.228s (-3.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (+10.0% 🔺)2.010s (~)0.783s101.06x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.273s (+9.0% 🔺)1.991s (~)0.011s (+660.0% 🔺)2.052s (+2.1%)0.779s101.10x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.486s (+18.8% 🔺)3.711s (+23.9% 🔺)0.847s (-26.9% 🟢)4.965s (+9.1% 🔺)2.479s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.562s (-21.7% 🟢)3.764s (-18.4% 🟢)0.852s (+25.7% 🔺)5.158s (-11.2% 🟢)2.596s101.03x
▲ VercelExpress2.716s (+2.8%)4.004s (+9.2% 🔺)0.568s (-37.9% 🟢)5.270s (+5.9% 🔺)2.554s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.576s (-1.7%)2.007s (~)0.005s (~)2.026s (~)0.450s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (~)2.011s (~)0.012s (-16.4% 🟢)2.024s (~)0.447s301.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.589s (-0.5%)2.010s (~)0.013s (+6.4% 🔺)2.025s (~)0.436s301.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.628s (-6.6% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.014s (+10.9% 🔺)2.026s (~)0.399s301.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.761s (~)2.010s (~)0.005s (-1.3%)2.025s (~)0.264s301.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.006s (+26.0% 🔺)2.395s (+19.5% 🔺)0.004s (-18.1% 🟢)2.446s (+20.7% 🔺)0.439s251.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)6.178s (-4.6%)7.431s (-3.3%)0.206s (+26.3% 🔺)8.158s (-1.7%)1.980s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.448s (+4.7%)8.058s (+2.0%)0.155s (-18.2% 🟢)8.655s (+0.7%)2.208s71.04x
▲ VercelExpress6.540s8.098s0.219s8.772s2.232s71.06x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.700s (-11.7% 🟢)1.029s (-1.8%)0.000s (-1.7%)1.042s (-2.4%)0.341s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.060s (+5.0%)1.581s (+8.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)1.588s (+8.7% 🔺)0.528s381.51x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.212s (+58.9% 🔺)1.681s (+63.3% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)1.724s (+64.0% 🔺)0.512s351.73x
💻 LocalNitro1.394s (-1.7%)2.013s (~)0.000s (+20.0% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.621s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.416s (+2.6%)2.014s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.600s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.419s (-5.7% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.000s (-7.7% 🟢)2.016s (~)0.597s302.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.686s (-40.0% 🟢)3.822s (-34.2% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)4.294s (-31.0% 🟢)1.608s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.898s (+2.1%)4.249s (+3.1%)0.000s (NaN%)4.799s (+4.8%)1.901s131.08x
▲ VercelNitro2.914s (-12.9% 🟢)4.173s (-10.8% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)4.591s (-11.3% 🟢)1.676s141.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.766s (+8.3% 🔺)2.306s (+7.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.337s (+7.0% 🔺)0.571s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.248s (+13.5% 🔺)2.776s (+15.6% 🔺)0.000s (+13.6% 🔺)2.782s (+15.5% 🔺)0.535s221.27x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.546s (+57.5% 🔺)3.161s (+47.8% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)3.204s (+48.9% 🔺)0.658s191.44x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.908s (-3.3%)3.553s (+0.8%)0.000s (-32.6% 🟢)3.556s (+0.8%)0.648s171.65x
💻 LocalNitro3.042s (-1.2%)3.775s (~)0.001s (+44.4% 🔺)3.780s (~)0.738s161.72x
💻 LocalExpress3.128s (-2.4%)3.901s (-3.2%)0.000s (-40.3% 🟢)3.904s (-3.2%)0.776s161.77x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.346s (-2.7%)5.557s (-9.6% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.013s (-10.1% 🟢)1.667s101.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.351s (-20.0% 🟢)5.807s (-15.3% 🟢)0.004s (+1520.0% 🔺)6.281s (-13.9% 🟢)1.929s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.033s (-12.0% 🟢)6.381s (-6.8% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.856s (-5.6% 🟢)1.824s91.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalNitro12/21
🐘 PostgresNitro18/21
▲ VercelNitro9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres13/21
Next.js (Turbopack)💻 Local11/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production138702191606
✅ 💻 Local Development182502192044
✅ 📦 Local Production182502192044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres181102332044
✅ 🪟 Windows14600146
✅ 📋 Other84401781022
Total7838010688906

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro120026
✅ example120026
✅ express120026
✅ fastify120026
✅ hono120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack14402
✅ nextjs-webpack14402
✅ nitro120026
✅ nuxt120026
✅ sveltekit13907
✅ vite120026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable120026
✅ express-stable120026
✅ fastify-stable120026
✅ hono-stable120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nitro-stable120026
✅ nuxt-stable120026
✅ sveltekit-stable13907
✅ vite-stable120026
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack14600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable120026
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-120026
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start120026

📋 View full workflow run

@socket-security

socket-securityBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

DiffPackageSupply Chain
Security
VulnerabilityQualityMaintenanceLicense
Addednpm/​esbuild@​0.28.1911007391100

View full report

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the workspace’s esbuild dependency to ^0.28.1 to address GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr, propagating the bump via the pnpm catalog and updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump esbuild in the pnpm catalog from ^0.27.3 to ^0.28.1.
  • Re-resolve pnpm-lock.yaml to incorporate esbuild@0.28.1 and its platform binaries.
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
pnpm-workspace.yamlUpdates the pnpm catalog to use esbuild: ^0.28.1.
pnpm-lock.yamlUpdates lockfile resolutions to include esbuild@0.28.1 and related dependency graph changes.
.changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.mdAdds a patch changeset for publishable consumers impacted by the bump.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 36 to +38
esbuild:
specifier: ^0.27.3
version: 0.27.7
specifier: ^0.28.1
version: 0.28.1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that 0.27.7 lingers transitively. I tried both remediation paths:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet. vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) still pins ^0.27.3, both of which exclude 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as a breaking bump). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this — too risky for the example workbenches.
  2. Force a pnpm override (esbuild: ^0.28.1) — this does unify everything on 0.28.1, but it breaks @workflow/web's production build: react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment ... is not supported yet on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine. So the override regresses a published, deployed package, and I reverted it.

Given the advisory's exploitable path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts; the Node install path already verifies integrity) and the remaining copies are build-time-only dev tooling (vite/astro/fumadocs), the residual risk is negligible. The flagged direct dependency in packages/builders — the subject of the advisory — is on 0.28.1. I've left the transitive copies rather than ship a broken build; they'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +11899 to +11905
hasBin: true

esbuild@0.28.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-HrJrvZv5ayxBzPfwphOoNzkzOIIlifzk0KJrGK2c8R4+LKpMtpYLQeUdjnwjWv/LZlkH2laZk+4w78pi99D4Vw==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on the churn — fixed in 991f628. Re-resolving the lockfile now drops esbuild@0.28.0 entirely: nitropack@2.13.4 (which declares esbuild: ^0.28.0) consolidates onto 0.28.1, so only 0.28.1 plus the upstream-pinned 0.27.7 remain.

Minor correction: 0.28.0 wasn't actually orphaned in the prior revision — it was still referenced by nitropack@2.13.4 — but that's moot now that it's gone.

The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 011d482 into mainJun 13, 2026
121 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/esbuild-0.28.1 branch June 13, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed for 011d482 due to a workflow error (backport job run).

This is usually an infrastructure problem (e.g. the configured AI model could not be found, an AI Gateway error, or an opencode crash) rather than a merge conflict. Check the job logs linked above for details.

Once the underlying issue is fixed, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

011d482808793e8deb0e8523a9c16af129490ee6

github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
* fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)
Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(ci): exclude esbuild from minimumReleaseAge gate
The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranay Prakash <pranay.gp@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2404. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

VaguelySerious pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2026
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
…-stable
* origin/stable:
[test] Fix stable e2e hookGetConflict test to use waitForHookState (#2405)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399) (#2401)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395) (#2404)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
* origin/main:
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
* origin/main:
Small detail panel cleanup (#2459)
Fix lazy Next workflow HMR (#2438)
Prevent peer dependency-only major bumps (#2437)
fix(changesets): only major-bump peer dependents when out of range (#2439)
Version Packages (beta) (#2428)
otel: explicit traceparent injection + linked-trace mode for bounded per-invocation traces (#2363)
[next] Clarify `serverExternalPackages` warning (#2417)
Add .swc gitignore handling to builder (#2427)
Version Packages (beta) (#2390)
[ci] Increase dev.test.ts cleanup hook timeout (#2416)
[world-vercel] Switch event endpoints to v4 wire format (#2055)
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
test: e2e coverage for run-idempotency conflict-handling strategies (#2387)
# Conflicts:
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranaygp@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) by pranaygp · Pull Request #2395 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) - #2395

Merged
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#2395
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygppranaygp commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Must be backported to stable (4.x) post-merge

This PR must be backported to the stable branch after merge. The stable (4.x) branch carries the identical esbuild: ^0.27.3 catalog entry and the same packages/builders consumer, so it is affected by the same advisory. The included changeset uses a patch bump precisely so the backport publishes a 4.x patch release. If the automated backport action declines or conflicts, force it via workflow_dispatch on .github/workflows/backport.yml.

Resolves Linear VULN-11749.

What this fixes

Socket / GitHub advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr"Missing binary integrity verification … enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY" (High, CVSS 8.1). Affected range >= 0.17.0 < 0.28.1; fixed in 0.28.1.

This bumps the pnpm catalog entry for esbuild from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1. Every workspace package that depends on esbuild references it via catalog:@workflow/builders, @workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root dev dependency — so the single catalog change propagates to all of them, and the flagged direct dependency in packages/builders now resolves to 0.28.1.

Honest risk assessment

The advisory is real and correctly flagged, but the exploitable code path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts downloaded the native binary without SHA-256 verification when NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY is set). The Node.js install path already verified integrity, and this repo is a Node.js/pnpm project that never uses esbuild's Deno distribution — so practical exploitability here is low. Regardless, 0.27.7 is in the affected npm range, it's a direct dependency of packages/builders, and the remediation is free, so upgrading is correct and clears the alert. (esbuild 0.28.0/0.28.1 exist specifically to add these integrity checks.)

Transitive esbuild copies (why some 0.27.7 remains)

0.27.7 still appears transitively under build-time-only dev tooling in the example workbenches (vite, astro, fumadocs). I tried both ways to remove it:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet: vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) pins ^0.27.3, both excluding 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as breaking). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this.
  2. Force a pnpm override — unifies everything on 0.28.1, but breaks @workflow/web's build (react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with "Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment … is not supported yet" on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine). Reverted.

Since the vuln path is Deno-only and these are build-time dev tooling, the residual risk is negligible. They'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges. (Re-resolving did drop the redundant 0.28.0 — nitropack consolidated onto 0.28.1.)

CI: minimumReleaseAge fix

The canary E2E jobs run pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (they mutate the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hit the workspace's 48h minimumReleaseAge gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1 (ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION). Fixed by adding esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude — pnpm's recommended remedy, consistent with the existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions. --frozen-lockfile jobs (Build Packages, stable E2E) were unaffected and already passed.

Changes

  • pnpm-workspace.yaml: esbuild catalog ^0.27.3^0.28.1; add esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: re-resolved esbuild graph to 0.28.1 (diff scoped entirely to esbuild + @esbuild/*)
  • .changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.md: patch bump for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli

Verification

  • @workflow/builders builds and all 170 tests pass against 0.28.1 (exercises the esbuild.build() API directly).
  • @workflow/web builds cleanly (confirming the override revert).
  • pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (the canary install mode) now completes with no age-gate error and a stable lockfile.
  • esbuild changelog confirms no JS API signature changes in 0.28.x — only install-time integrity checks plus minor codegen fixes.

Note: the only currently-failing check, E2E Vercel Prod Tests (fastify), is an unrelated flaky abort test (AbortController > abortFromStepWorkflow, 119 passed / 1 failed) — a distributed-abort timing test against a live preview, not affected by an esbuild version bump.

Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2026 06:06
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 13, 2026 06:06
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 991f628

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.040s (-10.1% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.965s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.044s (~)1.007s (~)0.962s101.10x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.053s (-16.4% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.960s101.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.054s (-13.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.952s101.35x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.065s (-2.3%)1.012s (~)0.947s101.61x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.068s (+1.6%)1.012s (~)0.944s101.69x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.269s (-55.9% 🟢)2.408s (-2.5%)2.139s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro0.409s (+14.3% 🔺)2.538s (-2.1%)2.129s101.52x
▲ VercelExpress0.450s (+48.3% 🔺)2.745s (+24.2% 🔺)2.295s101.67x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.091s (~)2.006s (~)0.915s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.101s (~)2.007s (~)0.906s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.106s (~)2.011s (~)0.905s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.106s (~)2.013s (~)0.907s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.113s (-2.6%)2.006s (~)0.893s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.148s (+0.6%)2.010s (~)0.862s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.681s (-21.9% 🟢)3.444s (-14.2% 🟢)1.763s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress1.755s (+1.1%)4.086s (+23.8% 🔺)2.331s101.04x
▲ VercelNitro1.836s (+4.1%)3.705s (-4.0%)1.868s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.508s (~)11.022s (~)0.514s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.555s (~)11.017s (~)0.462s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.560s (~)11.023s (~)0.462s31.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.656s (-1.1%)11.023s (~)0.367s31.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.749s (+1.9%)11.020s (~)0.272s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.869s (~)11.018s (~)0.150s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro15.115s (+8.2% 🔺)17.194s (+9.2% 🔺)2.079s21.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)15.331s (+5.8% 🔺)16.760s (+3.3%)1.429s21.01x
▲ VercelExpress15.575s (+7.8% 🔺)17.240s (+12.0% 🔺)1.664s21.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro13.692s (~)14.027s (~)0.335s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.801s (~)14.028s (~)0.227s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.962s (~)14.221s (+1.4%)0.258s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.107s (-1.7%)15.030s (~)0.923s41.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.120s (+2.2%)14.626s (+4.3%)0.506s51.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.580s (+1.2%)15.024s (~)0.444s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express25.201s (+23.3% 🔺)27.562s (+25.7% 🔺)2.361s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro26.340s (+8.1% 🔺)27.894s (+6.3% 🔺)1.555s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)27.027s (+24.1% 🔺)28.718s (+18.1% 🔺)1.692s31.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro12.423s (-1.6%)13.017s (~)0.594s71.00x
💻 LocalExpress12.571s (~)13.026s (~)0.455s71.01x
💻 LocalNitro12.685s (+2.5%)13.170s (+1.1%)0.485s71.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.985s (-6.1% 🟢)13.310s (-6.1% 🟢)0.326s71.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.748s (+9.3% 🔺)14.162s (+8.8% 🔺)0.414s71.11x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.760s (-2.2%)14.018s (-3.9%)0.258s71.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro35.523s (+20.3% 🔺)38.316s (+18.5% 🔺)2.793s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress37.263s (+11.1% 🔺)39.690s (+13.4% 🔺)2.427s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)39.355s (+22.5% 🔺)41.407s (+24.6% 🔺)2.052s31.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.193s (-2.4%)2.007s (~)0.814s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.205s (-0.5%)2.008s (~)0.803s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.207s (-5.4% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.799s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.230s (+3.8%)2.006s (~)0.776s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s (-7.8% 🟢)2.005s (~)0.747s151.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.267s (-3.1%)2.008s (~)0.741s151.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.329s (+4.2%)3.867s (+6.1% 🔺)1.538s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.425s (-41.9% 🟢)4.077s (-27.4% 🟢)1.652s81.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.689s (-5.3% 🟢)4.438s (+3.5%)1.749s71.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.394s (-2.0%)2.269s (+5.5% 🔺)0.875s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.431s (+1.2%)2.318s (-3.1%)0.887s131.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.540s (-2.6%)2.223s (-4.1%)0.683s141.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.716s (-2.5%)2.006s (-6.8% 🟢)0.290s151.23x
💻 LocalNitro1.761s (~)2.006s (-3.2%)0.245s151.26x
💻 LocalExpress1.991s (-3.5%)2.394s (-4.6%)0.403s131.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.210s (-44.7% 🟢)5.076s (-29.4% 🟢)1.866s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro3.399s (+21.7% 🔺)4.984s (+15.1% 🔺)1.585s71.06x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.466s (+42.0% 🔺)6.037s (+31.9% 🔺)1.571s51.39x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.815s (+11.7% 🔺)3.887s (-6.0% 🟢)2.073s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.971s (+20.9% 🔺)3.583s (-10.7% 🟢)1.612s91.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.544s (+10.2% 🔺)4.268s (+6.3% 🔺)0.724s81.95x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.335s (-6.3% 🟢)5.011s (~)0.676s62.39x
💻 LocalNitro4.920s (+9.3% 🔺)5.349s (+3.2%)0.428s62.71x
💻 LocalExpress5.499s (-2.7%)6.214s (+3.3%)0.716s53.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.535s (+13.5% 🔺)5.797s (+26.3% 🔺)2.261s61.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.951s (-33.5% 🟢)5.513s (-25.4% 🟢)1.562s61.12x
▲ VercelNitro4.368s (+9.6% 🔺)6.104s (+2.8%)1.736s61.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.199s (-1.5%)2.008s (~)0.809s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.289s (+5.3% 🔺)2.009s (~)0.720s151.08x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.307s (+1.2%)2.007s (~)0.700s151.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.349s (-0.9%)2.006s (~)0.657s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.458s (-5.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.550s151.22x
💻 LocalExpress1.587s (+2.6%)2.007s (~)0.419s151.32x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.356s (-28.1% 🟢)4.014s (-19.9% 🟢)1.658s81.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.775s (-28.5% 🟢)4.260s (-17.6% 🟢)1.485s81.18x
▲ VercelExpress3.065s (+10.2% 🔺)4.878s (+18.3% 🔺)1.813s71.30x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.437s (+6.6% 🔺)2.230s (+3.6%)0.793s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s (~)2.141s (~)0.608s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.582s (+10.8% 🔺)2.675s (+20.3% 🔺)1.093s121.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.943s (-5.4% 🟢)2.292s (-18.9% 🟢)0.349s141.35x
💻 LocalNitro2.132s (+17.7% 🔺)2.591s (+16.5% 🔺)0.459s121.48x
💻 LocalExpress2.387s (+10.8% 🔺)2.918s (+12.5% 🔺)0.530s111.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.924s (-26.1% 🟢)4.803s (-14.4% 🟢)1.879s71.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.955s (-50.8% 🟢)4.728s (-37.3% 🟢)1.773s71.01x
▲ VercelExpress3.141s (-58.4% 🟢)5.306s (-40.3% 🟢)2.166s61.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.595s (-4.5%)3.766s (-12.5% 🟢)2.172s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.690s (-18.0% 🟢)3.761s (-9.2% 🟢)2.072s81.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.109s (+24.6% 🔺)5.013s (+24.9% 🔺)0.904s62.58x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.723s (-6.2% 🟢)5.343s (-3.1%)0.620s62.96x
💻 LocalNitro5.876s (+8.2% 🔺)6.418s (+9.7% 🔺)0.542s53.68x
💻 LocalExpress6.316s (+3.6%)6.819s (+3.1%)0.503s53.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.333s (-48.9% 🟢)5.237s (-36.0% 🟢)1.903s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.018s (-61.0% 🟢)5.716s (-51.8% 🟢)1.697s61.21x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.668s (+42.9% 🔺)6.481s (+33.7% 🔺)1.814s51.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.588s (~)1.005s (~)0.417s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.614s (+6.1% 🔺)1.059s (+5.2% 🔺)0.445s571.04x
💻 LocalExpress0.652s (+6.9% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.353s601.11x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.703s (-19.4% 🟢)1.022s (-1.7%)0.318s591.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.732s (+29.2% 🔺)1.129s (+12.2% 🔺)0.397s541.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.856s (+6.3% 🔺)1.040s (+3.4%)0.184s581.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.697s (-8.5% 🟢)6.481s (-7.1% 🟢)1.784s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.010s (-5.1% 🟢)6.696s (-0.8%)1.686s91.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.418s (+6.4% 🔺)7.228s (+5.5% 🔺)1.810s91.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.339s (-4.5%)2.030s (+1.1%)0.690s451.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.513s (+0.7%)2.006s (~)0.493s451.13x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.604s (+10.8% 🔺)2.132s (+3.9%)0.528s431.20x
💻 LocalExpress1.616s (+6.1% 🔺)2.007s (~)0.391s451.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.676s (-21.3% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.331s451.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.968s (+3.0%)2.251s (+8.5% 🔺)0.283s411.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro12.141s (-13.4% 🟢)13.695s (-16.0% 🟢)1.554s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress12.341s (~)14.549s (+2.4%)2.209s71.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.105s (-20.0% 🟢)15.264s (-15.8% 🟢)2.159s61.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.703s (-1.2%)3.111s (+2.6%)0.408s391.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.806s (+1.7%)3.404s (+8.5% 🔺)0.598s361.04x
💻 LocalNitro3.335s (+3.5%)3.976s (-0.8%)0.641s311.23x
💻 LocalExpress3.419s (+3.0%)4.042s (+0.8%)0.624s301.26x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.625s (-16.6% 🟢)4.042s (-19.3% 🟢)0.417s301.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.859s (-0.6%)4.076s (-2.5%)0.217s301.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro23.984s (-22.3% 🟢)25.857s (-21.4% 🟢)1.873s51.00x
▲ VercelExpress24.791s (-9.0% 🟢)27.182s (-5.7% 🟢)2.391s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)26.311s (-12.0% 🟢)28.173s (-11.5% 🟢)1.862s51.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.240s (-4.6%)1.006s (~)0.767s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.297s (-3.5%)1.006s (-1.7%)0.709s601.24x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.363s (+45.0% 🔺)1.022s (+1.6%)0.659s591.51x
💻 LocalNitro0.435s (+9.3% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.569s601.82x
💻 LocalExpress0.444s (+13.4% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.561s601.85x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.551s (-4.6%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.470s592.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.000s (+6.1% 🔺)3.453s (-16.4% 🟢)1.453s181.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.020s (-11.6% 🟢)3.965s (+1.1%)1.945s161.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.085s (-15.6% 🟢)3.906s (-4.1%)1.821s161.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.391s (-7.3% 🟢)1.028s (-3.4%)0.638s881.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.470s (+12.5% 🔺)1.053s (+1.2%)0.583s861.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.562s (+1.7%)1.066s (+1.2%)0.504s851.44x
💻 LocalExpress2.144s (-0.9%)2.737s (+0.8%)0.593s335.49x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.284s (-6.5% 🟢)2.977s (-6.5% 🟢)0.693s315.85x
💻 LocalNitro2.295s (+8.3% 🔺)2.912s (+9.6% 🔺)0.617s315.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.518s (-9.1% 🟢)4.300s (+0.7%)1.782s211.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.698s (~)4.162s (-6.3% 🟢)1.464s221.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.065s (+6.4% 🔺)4.810s (+8.8% 🔺)1.745s191.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.763s (-9.1% 🟢)1.270s (-16.5% 🟢)0.507s951.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.830s (+2.2%)1.366s (-13.9% 🟢)0.536s881.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.700s (+4.0%)3.575s (+3.9%)0.875s343.54x
💻 LocalNitro9.704s (+3.8%)10.111s (+1.6%)0.408s1212.72x
💻 LocalExpress9.919s (+1.2%)10.446s (+0.8%)0.526s1213.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s (+5.0% 🔺)11.577s (+5.0%)0.921s1113.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express6.128s (-22.0% 🟢)7.798s (-15.6% 🟢)1.670s161.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.371s (~)7.949s (-5.1% 🟢)1.578s161.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.568s (-14.7% 🟢)8.365s (-10.3% 🟢)1.797s151.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.162s (-0.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (-7.7% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.850s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.163s (~)2.005s (~)0.011s (+6.1% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.854s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.168s (-3.3%)2.003s (~)0.010s (-2.9%)2.017s (~)0.849s101.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.171s (~)2.005s (~)0.013s (+2.4%)2.020s (~)0.849s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.228s (-3.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (+10.0% 🔺)2.010s (~)0.783s101.06x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.273s (+9.0% 🔺)1.991s (~)0.011s (+660.0% 🔺)2.052s (+2.1%)0.779s101.10x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.486s (+18.8% 🔺)3.711s (+23.9% 🔺)0.847s (-26.9% 🟢)4.965s (+9.1% 🔺)2.479s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.562s (-21.7% 🟢)3.764s (-18.4% 🟢)0.852s (+25.7% 🔺)5.158s (-11.2% 🟢)2.596s101.03x
▲ VercelExpress2.716s (+2.8%)4.004s (+9.2% 🔺)0.568s (-37.9% 🟢)5.270s (+5.9% 🔺)2.554s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.576s (-1.7%)2.007s (~)0.005s (~)2.026s (~)0.450s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (~)2.011s (~)0.012s (-16.4% 🟢)2.024s (~)0.447s301.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.589s (-0.5%)2.010s (~)0.013s (+6.4% 🔺)2.025s (~)0.436s301.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.628s (-6.6% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.014s (+10.9% 🔺)2.026s (~)0.399s301.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.761s (~)2.010s (~)0.005s (-1.3%)2.025s (~)0.264s301.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.006s (+26.0% 🔺)2.395s (+19.5% 🔺)0.004s (-18.1% 🟢)2.446s (+20.7% 🔺)0.439s251.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)6.178s (-4.6%)7.431s (-3.3%)0.206s (+26.3% 🔺)8.158s (-1.7%)1.980s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.448s (+4.7%)8.058s (+2.0%)0.155s (-18.2% 🟢)8.655s (+0.7%)2.208s71.04x
▲ VercelExpress6.540s8.098s0.219s8.772s2.232s71.06x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.700s (-11.7% 🟢)1.029s (-1.8%)0.000s (-1.7%)1.042s (-2.4%)0.341s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.060s (+5.0%)1.581s (+8.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)1.588s (+8.7% 🔺)0.528s381.51x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.212s (+58.9% 🔺)1.681s (+63.3% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)1.724s (+64.0% 🔺)0.512s351.73x
💻 LocalNitro1.394s (-1.7%)2.013s (~)0.000s (+20.0% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.621s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.416s (+2.6%)2.014s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.600s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.419s (-5.7% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.000s (-7.7% 🟢)2.016s (~)0.597s302.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.686s (-40.0% 🟢)3.822s (-34.2% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)4.294s (-31.0% 🟢)1.608s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.898s (+2.1%)4.249s (+3.1%)0.000s (NaN%)4.799s (+4.8%)1.901s131.08x
▲ VercelNitro2.914s (-12.9% 🟢)4.173s (-10.8% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)4.591s (-11.3% 🟢)1.676s141.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.766s (+8.3% 🔺)2.306s (+7.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.337s (+7.0% 🔺)0.571s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.248s (+13.5% 🔺)2.776s (+15.6% 🔺)0.000s (+13.6% 🔺)2.782s (+15.5% 🔺)0.535s221.27x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.546s (+57.5% 🔺)3.161s (+47.8% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)3.204s (+48.9% 🔺)0.658s191.44x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.908s (-3.3%)3.553s (+0.8%)0.000s (-32.6% 🟢)3.556s (+0.8%)0.648s171.65x
💻 LocalNitro3.042s (-1.2%)3.775s (~)0.001s (+44.4% 🔺)3.780s (~)0.738s161.72x
💻 LocalExpress3.128s (-2.4%)3.901s (-3.2%)0.000s (-40.3% 🟢)3.904s (-3.2%)0.776s161.77x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.346s (-2.7%)5.557s (-9.6% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.013s (-10.1% 🟢)1.667s101.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.351s (-20.0% 🟢)5.807s (-15.3% 🟢)0.004s (+1520.0% 🔺)6.281s (-13.9% 🟢)1.929s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.033s (-12.0% 🟢)6.381s (-6.8% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.856s (-5.6% 🟢)1.824s91.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalNitro12/21
🐘 PostgresNitro18/21
▲ VercelNitro9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres13/21
Next.js (Turbopack)💻 Local11/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production138702191606
✅ 💻 Local Development182502192044
✅ 📦 Local Production182502192044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres181102332044
✅ 🪟 Windows14600146
✅ 📋 Other84401781022
Total7838010688906

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro120026
✅ example120026
✅ express120026
✅ fastify120026
✅ hono120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack14402
✅ nextjs-webpack14402
✅ nitro120026
✅ nuxt120026
✅ sveltekit13907
✅ vite120026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable120026
✅ express-stable120026
✅ fastify-stable120026
✅ hono-stable120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nitro-stable120026
✅ nuxt-stable120026
✅ sveltekit-stable13907
✅ vite-stable120026
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack14600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable120026
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-120026
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start120026

📋 View full workflow run

@socket-security

socket-securityBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

DiffPackageSupply Chain
Security
VulnerabilityQualityMaintenanceLicense
Addednpm/​esbuild@​0.28.1911007391100

View full report

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the workspace’s esbuild dependency to ^0.28.1 to address GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr, propagating the bump via the pnpm catalog and updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump esbuild in the pnpm catalog from ^0.27.3 to ^0.28.1.
  • Re-resolve pnpm-lock.yaml to incorporate esbuild@0.28.1 and its platform binaries.
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
pnpm-workspace.yamlUpdates the pnpm catalog to use esbuild: ^0.28.1.
pnpm-lock.yamlUpdates lockfile resolutions to include esbuild@0.28.1 and related dependency graph changes.
.changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.mdAdds a patch changeset for publishable consumers impacted by the bump.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 36 to +38
esbuild:
specifier: ^0.27.3
version: 0.27.7
specifier: ^0.28.1
version: 0.28.1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that 0.27.7 lingers transitively. I tried both remediation paths:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet. vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) still pins ^0.27.3, both of which exclude 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as a breaking bump). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this — too risky for the example workbenches.
  2. Force a pnpm override (esbuild: ^0.28.1) — this does unify everything on 0.28.1, but it breaks @workflow/web's production build: react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment ... is not supported yet on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine. So the override regresses a published, deployed package, and I reverted it.

Given the advisory's exploitable path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts; the Node install path already verifies integrity) and the remaining copies are build-time-only dev tooling (vite/astro/fumadocs), the residual risk is negligible. The flagged direct dependency in packages/builders — the subject of the advisory — is on 0.28.1. I've left the transitive copies rather than ship a broken build; they'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +11899 to +11905
hasBin: true

esbuild@0.28.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-HrJrvZv5ayxBzPfwphOoNzkzOIIlifzk0KJrGK2c8R4+LKpMtpYLQeUdjnwjWv/LZlkH2laZk+4w78pi99D4Vw==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on the churn — fixed in 991f628. Re-resolving the lockfile now drops esbuild@0.28.0 entirely: nitropack@2.13.4 (which declares esbuild: ^0.28.0) consolidates onto 0.28.1, so only 0.28.1 plus the upstream-pinned 0.27.7 remain.

Minor correction: 0.28.0 wasn't actually orphaned in the prior revision — it was still referenced by nitropack@2.13.4 — but that's moot now that it's gone.

The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 011d482 into mainJun 13, 2026
121 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/esbuild-0.28.1 branch June 13, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed for 011d482 due to a workflow error (backport job run).

This is usually an infrastructure problem (e.g. the configured AI model could not be found, an AI Gateway error, or an opencode crash) rather than a merge conflict. Check the job logs linked above for details.

Once the underlying issue is fixed, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

011d482808793e8deb0e8523a9c16af129490ee6

github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
* fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)
Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(ci): exclude esbuild from minimumReleaseAge gate
The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranay Prakash <pranay.gp@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2404. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

VaguelySerious pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2026
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
…-stable
* origin/stable:
[test] Fix stable e2e hookGetConflict test to use waitForHookState (#2405)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399) (#2401)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395) (#2404)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
* origin/main:
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
* origin/main:
Small detail panel cleanup (#2459)
Fix lazy Next workflow HMR (#2438)
Prevent peer dependency-only major bumps (#2437)
fix(changesets): only major-bump peer dependents when out of range (#2439)
Version Packages (beta) (#2428)
otel: explicit traceparent injection + linked-trace mode for bounded per-invocation traces (#2363)
[next] Clarify `serverExternalPackages` warning (#2417)
Add .swc gitignore handling to builder (#2427)
Version Packages (beta) (#2390)
[ci] Increase dev.test.ts cleanup hook timeout (#2416)
[world-vercel] Switch event endpoints to v4 wire format (#2055)
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
test: e2e coverage for run-idempotency conflict-handling strategies (#2387)
# Conflicts:
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranaygp@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) by pranaygp · Pull Request #2395 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) - #2395

Merged
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#2395
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygppranaygp commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Must be backported to stable (4.x) post-merge

This PR must be backported to the stable branch after merge. The stable (4.x) branch carries the identical esbuild: ^0.27.3 catalog entry and the same packages/builders consumer, so it is affected by the same advisory. The included changeset uses a patch bump precisely so the backport publishes a 4.x patch release. If the automated backport action declines or conflicts, force it via workflow_dispatch on .github/workflows/backport.yml.

Resolves Linear VULN-11749.

What this fixes

Socket / GitHub advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr"Missing binary integrity verification … enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY" (High, CVSS 8.1). Affected range >= 0.17.0 < 0.28.1; fixed in 0.28.1.

This bumps the pnpm catalog entry for esbuild from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1. Every workspace package that depends on esbuild references it via catalog:@workflow/builders, @workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root dev dependency — so the single catalog change propagates to all of them, and the flagged direct dependency in packages/builders now resolves to 0.28.1.

Honest risk assessment

The advisory is real and correctly flagged, but the exploitable code path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts downloaded the native binary without SHA-256 verification when NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY is set). The Node.js install path already verified integrity, and this repo is a Node.js/pnpm project that never uses esbuild's Deno distribution — so practical exploitability here is low. Regardless, 0.27.7 is in the affected npm range, it's a direct dependency of packages/builders, and the remediation is free, so upgrading is correct and clears the alert. (esbuild 0.28.0/0.28.1 exist specifically to add these integrity checks.)

Transitive esbuild copies (why some 0.27.7 remains)

0.27.7 still appears transitively under build-time-only dev tooling in the example workbenches (vite, astro, fumadocs). I tried both ways to remove it:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet: vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) pins ^0.27.3, both excluding 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as breaking). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this.
  2. Force a pnpm override — unifies everything on 0.28.1, but breaks @workflow/web's build (react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with "Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment … is not supported yet" on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine). Reverted.

Since the vuln path is Deno-only and these are build-time dev tooling, the residual risk is negligible. They'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges. (Re-resolving did drop the redundant 0.28.0 — nitropack consolidated onto 0.28.1.)

CI: minimumReleaseAge fix

The canary E2E jobs run pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (they mutate the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hit the workspace's 48h minimumReleaseAge gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1 (ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION). Fixed by adding esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude — pnpm's recommended remedy, consistent with the existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions. --frozen-lockfile jobs (Build Packages, stable E2E) were unaffected and already passed.

Changes

  • pnpm-workspace.yaml: esbuild catalog ^0.27.3^0.28.1; add esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: re-resolved esbuild graph to 0.28.1 (diff scoped entirely to esbuild + @esbuild/*)
  • .changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.md: patch bump for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli

Verification

  • @workflow/builders builds and all 170 tests pass against 0.28.1 (exercises the esbuild.build() API directly).
  • @workflow/web builds cleanly (confirming the override revert).
  • pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (the canary install mode) now completes with no age-gate error and a stable lockfile.
  • esbuild changelog confirms no JS API signature changes in 0.28.x — only install-time integrity checks plus minor codegen fixes.

Note: the only currently-failing check, E2E Vercel Prod Tests (fastify), is an unrelated flaky abort test (AbortController > abortFromStepWorkflow, 119 passed / 1 failed) — a distributed-abort timing test against a live preview, not affected by an esbuild version bump.

Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2026 06:06
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 13, 2026 06:06
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 991f628

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.040s (-10.1% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.965s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.044s (~)1.007s (~)0.962s101.10x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.053s (-16.4% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.960s101.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.054s (-13.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.952s101.35x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.065s (-2.3%)1.012s (~)0.947s101.61x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.068s (+1.6%)1.012s (~)0.944s101.69x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.269s (-55.9% 🟢)2.408s (-2.5%)2.139s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro0.409s (+14.3% 🔺)2.538s (-2.1%)2.129s101.52x
▲ VercelExpress0.450s (+48.3% 🔺)2.745s (+24.2% 🔺)2.295s101.67x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.091s (~)2.006s (~)0.915s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.101s (~)2.007s (~)0.906s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.106s (~)2.011s (~)0.905s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.106s (~)2.013s (~)0.907s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.113s (-2.6%)2.006s (~)0.893s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.148s (+0.6%)2.010s (~)0.862s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.681s (-21.9% 🟢)3.444s (-14.2% 🟢)1.763s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress1.755s (+1.1%)4.086s (+23.8% 🔺)2.331s101.04x
▲ VercelNitro1.836s (+4.1%)3.705s (-4.0%)1.868s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.508s (~)11.022s (~)0.514s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.555s (~)11.017s (~)0.462s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.560s (~)11.023s (~)0.462s31.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.656s (-1.1%)11.023s (~)0.367s31.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.749s (+1.9%)11.020s (~)0.272s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.869s (~)11.018s (~)0.150s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro15.115s (+8.2% 🔺)17.194s (+9.2% 🔺)2.079s21.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)15.331s (+5.8% 🔺)16.760s (+3.3%)1.429s21.01x
▲ VercelExpress15.575s (+7.8% 🔺)17.240s (+12.0% 🔺)1.664s21.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro13.692s (~)14.027s (~)0.335s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.801s (~)14.028s (~)0.227s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.962s (~)14.221s (+1.4%)0.258s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.107s (-1.7%)15.030s (~)0.923s41.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.120s (+2.2%)14.626s (+4.3%)0.506s51.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.580s (+1.2%)15.024s (~)0.444s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express25.201s (+23.3% 🔺)27.562s (+25.7% 🔺)2.361s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro26.340s (+8.1% 🔺)27.894s (+6.3% 🔺)1.555s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)27.027s (+24.1% 🔺)28.718s (+18.1% 🔺)1.692s31.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro12.423s (-1.6%)13.017s (~)0.594s71.00x
💻 LocalExpress12.571s (~)13.026s (~)0.455s71.01x
💻 LocalNitro12.685s (+2.5%)13.170s (+1.1%)0.485s71.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.985s (-6.1% 🟢)13.310s (-6.1% 🟢)0.326s71.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.748s (+9.3% 🔺)14.162s (+8.8% 🔺)0.414s71.11x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.760s (-2.2%)14.018s (-3.9%)0.258s71.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro35.523s (+20.3% 🔺)38.316s (+18.5% 🔺)2.793s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress37.263s (+11.1% 🔺)39.690s (+13.4% 🔺)2.427s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)39.355s (+22.5% 🔺)41.407s (+24.6% 🔺)2.052s31.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.193s (-2.4%)2.007s (~)0.814s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.205s (-0.5%)2.008s (~)0.803s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.207s (-5.4% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.799s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.230s (+3.8%)2.006s (~)0.776s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s (-7.8% 🟢)2.005s (~)0.747s151.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.267s (-3.1%)2.008s (~)0.741s151.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.329s (+4.2%)3.867s (+6.1% 🔺)1.538s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.425s (-41.9% 🟢)4.077s (-27.4% 🟢)1.652s81.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.689s (-5.3% 🟢)4.438s (+3.5%)1.749s71.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.394s (-2.0%)2.269s (+5.5% 🔺)0.875s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.431s (+1.2%)2.318s (-3.1%)0.887s131.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.540s (-2.6%)2.223s (-4.1%)0.683s141.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.716s (-2.5%)2.006s (-6.8% 🟢)0.290s151.23x
💻 LocalNitro1.761s (~)2.006s (-3.2%)0.245s151.26x
💻 LocalExpress1.991s (-3.5%)2.394s (-4.6%)0.403s131.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.210s (-44.7% 🟢)5.076s (-29.4% 🟢)1.866s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro3.399s (+21.7% 🔺)4.984s (+15.1% 🔺)1.585s71.06x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.466s (+42.0% 🔺)6.037s (+31.9% 🔺)1.571s51.39x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.815s (+11.7% 🔺)3.887s (-6.0% 🟢)2.073s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.971s (+20.9% 🔺)3.583s (-10.7% 🟢)1.612s91.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.544s (+10.2% 🔺)4.268s (+6.3% 🔺)0.724s81.95x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.335s (-6.3% 🟢)5.011s (~)0.676s62.39x
💻 LocalNitro4.920s (+9.3% 🔺)5.349s (+3.2%)0.428s62.71x
💻 LocalExpress5.499s (-2.7%)6.214s (+3.3%)0.716s53.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.535s (+13.5% 🔺)5.797s (+26.3% 🔺)2.261s61.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.951s (-33.5% 🟢)5.513s (-25.4% 🟢)1.562s61.12x
▲ VercelNitro4.368s (+9.6% 🔺)6.104s (+2.8%)1.736s61.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.199s (-1.5%)2.008s (~)0.809s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.289s (+5.3% 🔺)2.009s (~)0.720s151.08x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.307s (+1.2%)2.007s (~)0.700s151.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.349s (-0.9%)2.006s (~)0.657s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.458s (-5.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.550s151.22x
💻 LocalExpress1.587s (+2.6%)2.007s (~)0.419s151.32x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.356s (-28.1% 🟢)4.014s (-19.9% 🟢)1.658s81.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.775s (-28.5% 🟢)4.260s (-17.6% 🟢)1.485s81.18x
▲ VercelExpress3.065s (+10.2% 🔺)4.878s (+18.3% 🔺)1.813s71.30x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.437s (+6.6% 🔺)2.230s (+3.6%)0.793s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s (~)2.141s (~)0.608s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.582s (+10.8% 🔺)2.675s (+20.3% 🔺)1.093s121.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.943s (-5.4% 🟢)2.292s (-18.9% 🟢)0.349s141.35x
💻 LocalNitro2.132s (+17.7% 🔺)2.591s (+16.5% 🔺)0.459s121.48x
💻 LocalExpress2.387s (+10.8% 🔺)2.918s (+12.5% 🔺)0.530s111.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.924s (-26.1% 🟢)4.803s (-14.4% 🟢)1.879s71.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.955s (-50.8% 🟢)4.728s (-37.3% 🟢)1.773s71.01x
▲ VercelExpress3.141s (-58.4% 🟢)5.306s (-40.3% 🟢)2.166s61.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.595s (-4.5%)3.766s (-12.5% 🟢)2.172s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.690s (-18.0% 🟢)3.761s (-9.2% 🟢)2.072s81.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.109s (+24.6% 🔺)5.013s (+24.9% 🔺)0.904s62.58x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.723s (-6.2% 🟢)5.343s (-3.1%)0.620s62.96x
💻 LocalNitro5.876s (+8.2% 🔺)6.418s (+9.7% 🔺)0.542s53.68x
💻 LocalExpress6.316s (+3.6%)6.819s (+3.1%)0.503s53.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.333s (-48.9% 🟢)5.237s (-36.0% 🟢)1.903s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.018s (-61.0% 🟢)5.716s (-51.8% 🟢)1.697s61.21x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.668s (+42.9% 🔺)6.481s (+33.7% 🔺)1.814s51.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.588s (~)1.005s (~)0.417s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.614s (+6.1% 🔺)1.059s (+5.2% 🔺)0.445s571.04x
💻 LocalExpress0.652s (+6.9% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.353s601.11x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.703s (-19.4% 🟢)1.022s (-1.7%)0.318s591.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.732s (+29.2% 🔺)1.129s (+12.2% 🔺)0.397s541.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.856s (+6.3% 🔺)1.040s (+3.4%)0.184s581.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.697s (-8.5% 🟢)6.481s (-7.1% 🟢)1.784s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.010s (-5.1% 🟢)6.696s (-0.8%)1.686s91.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.418s (+6.4% 🔺)7.228s (+5.5% 🔺)1.810s91.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.339s (-4.5%)2.030s (+1.1%)0.690s451.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.513s (+0.7%)2.006s (~)0.493s451.13x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.604s (+10.8% 🔺)2.132s (+3.9%)0.528s431.20x
💻 LocalExpress1.616s (+6.1% 🔺)2.007s (~)0.391s451.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.676s (-21.3% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.331s451.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.968s (+3.0%)2.251s (+8.5% 🔺)0.283s411.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro12.141s (-13.4% 🟢)13.695s (-16.0% 🟢)1.554s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress12.341s (~)14.549s (+2.4%)2.209s71.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.105s (-20.0% 🟢)15.264s (-15.8% 🟢)2.159s61.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.703s (-1.2%)3.111s (+2.6%)0.408s391.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.806s (+1.7%)3.404s (+8.5% 🔺)0.598s361.04x
💻 LocalNitro3.335s (+3.5%)3.976s (-0.8%)0.641s311.23x
💻 LocalExpress3.419s (+3.0%)4.042s (+0.8%)0.624s301.26x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.625s (-16.6% 🟢)4.042s (-19.3% 🟢)0.417s301.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.859s (-0.6%)4.076s (-2.5%)0.217s301.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro23.984s (-22.3% 🟢)25.857s (-21.4% 🟢)1.873s51.00x
▲ VercelExpress24.791s (-9.0% 🟢)27.182s (-5.7% 🟢)2.391s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)26.311s (-12.0% 🟢)28.173s (-11.5% 🟢)1.862s51.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.240s (-4.6%)1.006s (~)0.767s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.297s (-3.5%)1.006s (-1.7%)0.709s601.24x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.363s (+45.0% 🔺)1.022s (+1.6%)0.659s591.51x
💻 LocalNitro0.435s (+9.3% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.569s601.82x
💻 LocalExpress0.444s (+13.4% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.561s601.85x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.551s (-4.6%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.470s592.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.000s (+6.1% 🔺)3.453s (-16.4% 🟢)1.453s181.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.020s (-11.6% 🟢)3.965s (+1.1%)1.945s161.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.085s (-15.6% 🟢)3.906s (-4.1%)1.821s161.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.391s (-7.3% 🟢)1.028s (-3.4%)0.638s881.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.470s (+12.5% 🔺)1.053s (+1.2%)0.583s861.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.562s (+1.7%)1.066s (+1.2%)0.504s851.44x
💻 LocalExpress2.144s (-0.9%)2.737s (+0.8%)0.593s335.49x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.284s (-6.5% 🟢)2.977s (-6.5% 🟢)0.693s315.85x
💻 LocalNitro2.295s (+8.3% 🔺)2.912s (+9.6% 🔺)0.617s315.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.518s (-9.1% 🟢)4.300s (+0.7%)1.782s211.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.698s (~)4.162s (-6.3% 🟢)1.464s221.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.065s (+6.4% 🔺)4.810s (+8.8% 🔺)1.745s191.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.763s (-9.1% 🟢)1.270s (-16.5% 🟢)0.507s951.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.830s (+2.2%)1.366s (-13.9% 🟢)0.536s881.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.700s (+4.0%)3.575s (+3.9%)0.875s343.54x
💻 LocalNitro9.704s (+3.8%)10.111s (+1.6%)0.408s1212.72x
💻 LocalExpress9.919s (+1.2%)10.446s (+0.8%)0.526s1213.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s (+5.0% 🔺)11.577s (+5.0%)0.921s1113.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express6.128s (-22.0% 🟢)7.798s (-15.6% 🟢)1.670s161.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.371s (~)7.949s (-5.1% 🟢)1.578s161.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.568s (-14.7% 🟢)8.365s (-10.3% 🟢)1.797s151.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.162s (-0.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (-7.7% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.850s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.163s (~)2.005s (~)0.011s (+6.1% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.854s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.168s (-3.3%)2.003s (~)0.010s (-2.9%)2.017s (~)0.849s101.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.171s (~)2.005s (~)0.013s (+2.4%)2.020s (~)0.849s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.228s (-3.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (+10.0% 🔺)2.010s (~)0.783s101.06x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.273s (+9.0% 🔺)1.991s (~)0.011s (+660.0% 🔺)2.052s (+2.1%)0.779s101.10x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.486s (+18.8% 🔺)3.711s (+23.9% 🔺)0.847s (-26.9% 🟢)4.965s (+9.1% 🔺)2.479s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.562s (-21.7% 🟢)3.764s (-18.4% 🟢)0.852s (+25.7% 🔺)5.158s (-11.2% 🟢)2.596s101.03x
▲ VercelExpress2.716s (+2.8%)4.004s (+9.2% 🔺)0.568s (-37.9% 🟢)5.270s (+5.9% 🔺)2.554s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.576s (-1.7%)2.007s (~)0.005s (~)2.026s (~)0.450s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (~)2.011s (~)0.012s (-16.4% 🟢)2.024s (~)0.447s301.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.589s (-0.5%)2.010s (~)0.013s (+6.4% 🔺)2.025s (~)0.436s301.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.628s (-6.6% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.014s (+10.9% 🔺)2.026s (~)0.399s301.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.761s (~)2.010s (~)0.005s (-1.3%)2.025s (~)0.264s301.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.006s (+26.0% 🔺)2.395s (+19.5% 🔺)0.004s (-18.1% 🟢)2.446s (+20.7% 🔺)0.439s251.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)6.178s (-4.6%)7.431s (-3.3%)0.206s (+26.3% 🔺)8.158s (-1.7%)1.980s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.448s (+4.7%)8.058s (+2.0%)0.155s (-18.2% 🟢)8.655s (+0.7%)2.208s71.04x
▲ VercelExpress6.540s8.098s0.219s8.772s2.232s71.06x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.700s (-11.7% 🟢)1.029s (-1.8%)0.000s (-1.7%)1.042s (-2.4%)0.341s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.060s (+5.0%)1.581s (+8.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)1.588s (+8.7% 🔺)0.528s381.51x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.212s (+58.9% 🔺)1.681s (+63.3% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)1.724s (+64.0% 🔺)0.512s351.73x
💻 LocalNitro1.394s (-1.7%)2.013s (~)0.000s (+20.0% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.621s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.416s (+2.6%)2.014s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.600s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.419s (-5.7% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.000s (-7.7% 🟢)2.016s (~)0.597s302.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.686s (-40.0% 🟢)3.822s (-34.2% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)4.294s (-31.0% 🟢)1.608s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.898s (+2.1%)4.249s (+3.1%)0.000s (NaN%)4.799s (+4.8%)1.901s131.08x
▲ VercelNitro2.914s (-12.9% 🟢)4.173s (-10.8% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)4.591s (-11.3% 🟢)1.676s141.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.766s (+8.3% 🔺)2.306s (+7.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.337s (+7.0% 🔺)0.571s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.248s (+13.5% 🔺)2.776s (+15.6% 🔺)0.000s (+13.6% 🔺)2.782s (+15.5% 🔺)0.535s221.27x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.546s (+57.5% 🔺)3.161s (+47.8% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)3.204s (+48.9% 🔺)0.658s191.44x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.908s (-3.3%)3.553s (+0.8%)0.000s (-32.6% 🟢)3.556s (+0.8%)0.648s171.65x
💻 LocalNitro3.042s (-1.2%)3.775s (~)0.001s (+44.4% 🔺)3.780s (~)0.738s161.72x
💻 LocalExpress3.128s (-2.4%)3.901s (-3.2%)0.000s (-40.3% 🟢)3.904s (-3.2%)0.776s161.77x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.346s (-2.7%)5.557s (-9.6% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.013s (-10.1% 🟢)1.667s101.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.351s (-20.0% 🟢)5.807s (-15.3% 🟢)0.004s (+1520.0% 🔺)6.281s (-13.9% 🟢)1.929s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.033s (-12.0% 🟢)6.381s (-6.8% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.856s (-5.6% 🟢)1.824s91.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalNitro12/21
🐘 PostgresNitro18/21
▲ VercelNitro9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres13/21
Next.js (Turbopack)💻 Local11/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production138702191606
✅ 💻 Local Development182502192044
✅ 📦 Local Production182502192044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres181102332044
✅ 🪟 Windows14600146
✅ 📋 Other84401781022
Total7838010688906

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro120026
✅ example120026
✅ express120026
✅ fastify120026
✅ hono120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack14402
✅ nextjs-webpack14402
✅ nitro120026
✅ nuxt120026
✅ sveltekit13907
✅ vite120026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable120026
✅ express-stable120026
✅ fastify-stable120026
✅ hono-stable120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nitro-stable120026
✅ nuxt-stable120026
✅ sveltekit-stable13907
✅ vite-stable120026
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack14600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable120026
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-120026
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start120026

📋 View full workflow run

@socket-security

socket-securityBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

DiffPackageSupply Chain
Security
VulnerabilityQualityMaintenanceLicense
Addednpm/​esbuild@​0.28.1911007391100

View full report

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the workspace’s esbuild dependency to ^0.28.1 to address GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr, propagating the bump via the pnpm catalog and updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump esbuild in the pnpm catalog from ^0.27.3 to ^0.28.1.
  • Re-resolve pnpm-lock.yaml to incorporate esbuild@0.28.1 and its platform binaries.
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
pnpm-workspace.yamlUpdates the pnpm catalog to use esbuild: ^0.28.1.
pnpm-lock.yamlUpdates lockfile resolutions to include esbuild@0.28.1 and related dependency graph changes.
.changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.mdAdds a patch changeset for publishable consumers impacted by the bump.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 36 to +38
esbuild:
specifier: ^0.27.3
version: 0.27.7
specifier: ^0.28.1
version: 0.28.1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that 0.27.7 lingers transitively. I tried both remediation paths:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet. vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) still pins ^0.27.3, both of which exclude 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as a breaking bump). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this — too risky for the example workbenches.
  2. Force a pnpm override (esbuild: ^0.28.1) — this does unify everything on 0.28.1, but it breaks @workflow/web's production build: react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment ... is not supported yet on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine. So the override regresses a published, deployed package, and I reverted it.

Given the advisory's exploitable path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts; the Node install path already verifies integrity) and the remaining copies are build-time-only dev tooling (vite/astro/fumadocs), the residual risk is negligible. The flagged direct dependency in packages/builders — the subject of the advisory — is on 0.28.1. I've left the transitive copies rather than ship a broken build; they'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +11899 to +11905
hasBin: true

esbuild@0.28.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-HrJrvZv5ayxBzPfwphOoNzkzOIIlifzk0KJrGK2c8R4+LKpMtpYLQeUdjnwjWv/LZlkH2laZk+4w78pi99D4Vw==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on the churn — fixed in 991f628. Re-resolving the lockfile now drops esbuild@0.28.0 entirely: nitropack@2.13.4 (which declares esbuild: ^0.28.0) consolidates onto 0.28.1, so only 0.28.1 plus the upstream-pinned 0.27.7 remain.

Minor correction: 0.28.0 wasn't actually orphaned in the prior revision — it was still referenced by nitropack@2.13.4 — but that's moot now that it's gone.

The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 011d482 into mainJun 13, 2026
121 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/esbuild-0.28.1 branch June 13, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed for 011d482 due to a workflow error (backport job run).

This is usually an infrastructure problem (e.g. the configured AI model could not be found, an AI Gateway error, or an opencode crash) rather than a merge conflict. Check the job logs linked above for details.

Once the underlying issue is fixed, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

011d482808793e8deb0e8523a9c16af129490ee6

github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
* fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)
Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(ci): exclude esbuild from minimumReleaseAge gate
The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranay Prakash <pranay.gp@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2404. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

VaguelySerious pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2026
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
…-stable
* origin/stable:
[test] Fix stable e2e hookGetConflict test to use waitForHookState (#2405)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399) (#2401)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395) (#2404)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
* origin/main:
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
* origin/main:
Small detail panel cleanup (#2459)
Fix lazy Next workflow HMR (#2438)
Prevent peer dependency-only major bumps (#2437)
fix(changesets): only major-bump peer dependents when out of range (#2439)
Version Packages (beta) (#2428)
otel: explicit traceparent injection + linked-trace mode for bounded per-invocation traces (#2363)
[next] Clarify `serverExternalPackages` warning (#2417)
Add .swc gitignore handling to builder (#2427)
Version Packages (beta) (#2390)
[ci] Increase dev.test.ts cleanup hook timeout (#2416)
[world-vercel] Switch event endpoints to v4 wire format (#2055)
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
test: e2e coverage for run-idempotency conflict-handling strategies (#2387)
# Conflicts:
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranaygp@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) by pranaygp · Pull Request #2395 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) - #2395

Merged
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#2395
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygppranaygp commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Must be backported to stable (4.x) post-merge

This PR must be backported to the stable branch after merge. The stable (4.x) branch carries the identical esbuild: ^0.27.3 catalog entry and the same packages/builders consumer, so it is affected by the same advisory. The included changeset uses a patch bump precisely so the backport publishes a 4.x patch release. If the automated backport action declines or conflicts, force it via workflow_dispatch on .github/workflows/backport.yml.

Resolves Linear VULN-11749.

What this fixes

Socket / GitHub advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr"Missing binary integrity verification … enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY" (High, CVSS 8.1). Affected range >= 0.17.0 < 0.28.1; fixed in 0.28.1.

This bumps the pnpm catalog entry for esbuild from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1. Every workspace package that depends on esbuild references it via catalog:@workflow/builders, @workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root dev dependency — so the single catalog change propagates to all of them, and the flagged direct dependency in packages/builders now resolves to 0.28.1.

Honest risk assessment

The advisory is real and correctly flagged, but the exploitable code path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts downloaded the native binary without SHA-256 verification when NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY is set). The Node.js install path already verified integrity, and this repo is a Node.js/pnpm project that never uses esbuild's Deno distribution — so practical exploitability here is low. Regardless, 0.27.7 is in the affected npm range, it's a direct dependency of packages/builders, and the remediation is free, so upgrading is correct and clears the alert. (esbuild 0.28.0/0.28.1 exist specifically to add these integrity checks.)

Transitive esbuild copies (why some 0.27.7 remains)

0.27.7 still appears transitively under build-time-only dev tooling in the example workbenches (vite, astro, fumadocs). I tried both ways to remove it:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet: vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) pins ^0.27.3, both excluding 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as breaking). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this.
  2. Force a pnpm override — unifies everything on 0.28.1, but breaks @workflow/web's build (react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with "Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment … is not supported yet" on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine). Reverted.

Since the vuln path is Deno-only and these are build-time dev tooling, the residual risk is negligible. They'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges. (Re-resolving did drop the redundant 0.28.0 — nitropack consolidated onto 0.28.1.)

CI: minimumReleaseAge fix

The canary E2E jobs run pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (they mutate the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hit the workspace's 48h minimumReleaseAge gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1 (ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION). Fixed by adding esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude — pnpm's recommended remedy, consistent with the existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions. --frozen-lockfile jobs (Build Packages, stable E2E) were unaffected and already passed.

Changes

  • pnpm-workspace.yaml: esbuild catalog ^0.27.3^0.28.1; add esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: re-resolved esbuild graph to 0.28.1 (diff scoped entirely to esbuild + @esbuild/*)
  • .changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.md: patch bump for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli

Verification

  • @workflow/builders builds and all 170 tests pass against 0.28.1 (exercises the esbuild.build() API directly).
  • @workflow/web builds cleanly (confirming the override revert).
  • pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (the canary install mode) now completes with no age-gate error and a stable lockfile.
  • esbuild changelog confirms no JS API signature changes in 0.28.x — only install-time integrity checks plus minor codegen fixes.

Note: the only currently-failing check, E2E Vercel Prod Tests (fastify), is an unrelated flaky abort test (AbortController > abortFromStepWorkflow, 119 passed / 1 failed) — a distributed-abort timing test against a live preview, not affected by an esbuild version bump.

Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2026 06:06
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 13, 2026 06:06
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 991f628

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.040s (-10.1% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.965s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.044s (~)1.007s (~)0.962s101.10x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.053s (-16.4% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.960s101.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.054s (-13.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.952s101.35x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.065s (-2.3%)1.012s (~)0.947s101.61x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.068s (+1.6%)1.012s (~)0.944s101.69x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.269s (-55.9% 🟢)2.408s (-2.5%)2.139s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro0.409s (+14.3% 🔺)2.538s (-2.1%)2.129s101.52x
▲ VercelExpress0.450s (+48.3% 🔺)2.745s (+24.2% 🔺)2.295s101.67x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.091s (~)2.006s (~)0.915s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.101s (~)2.007s (~)0.906s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.106s (~)2.011s (~)0.905s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.106s (~)2.013s (~)0.907s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.113s (-2.6%)2.006s (~)0.893s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.148s (+0.6%)2.010s (~)0.862s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.681s (-21.9% 🟢)3.444s (-14.2% 🟢)1.763s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress1.755s (+1.1%)4.086s (+23.8% 🔺)2.331s101.04x
▲ VercelNitro1.836s (+4.1%)3.705s (-4.0%)1.868s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.508s (~)11.022s (~)0.514s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.555s (~)11.017s (~)0.462s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.560s (~)11.023s (~)0.462s31.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.656s (-1.1%)11.023s (~)0.367s31.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.749s (+1.9%)11.020s (~)0.272s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.869s (~)11.018s (~)0.150s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro15.115s (+8.2% 🔺)17.194s (+9.2% 🔺)2.079s21.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)15.331s (+5.8% 🔺)16.760s (+3.3%)1.429s21.01x
▲ VercelExpress15.575s (+7.8% 🔺)17.240s (+12.0% 🔺)1.664s21.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro13.692s (~)14.027s (~)0.335s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.801s (~)14.028s (~)0.227s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.962s (~)14.221s (+1.4%)0.258s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.107s (-1.7%)15.030s (~)0.923s41.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.120s (+2.2%)14.626s (+4.3%)0.506s51.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.580s (+1.2%)15.024s (~)0.444s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express25.201s (+23.3% 🔺)27.562s (+25.7% 🔺)2.361s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro26.340s (+8.1% 🔺)27.894s (+6.3% 🔺)1.555s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)27.027s (+24.1% 🔺)28.718s (+18.1% 🔺)1.692s31.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro12.423s (-1.6%)13.017s (~)0.594s71.00x
💻 LocalExpress12.571s (~)13.026s (~)0.455s71.01x
💻 LocalNitro12.685s (+2.5%)13.170s (+1.1%)0.485s71.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.985s (-6.1% 🟢)13.310s (-6.1% 🟢)0.326s71.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.748s (+9.3% 🔺)14.162s (+8.8% 🔺)0.414s71.11x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.760s (-2.2%)14.018s (-3.9%)0.258s71.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro35.523s (+20.3% 🔺)38.316s (+18.5% 🔺)2.793s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress37.263s (+11.1% 🔺)39.690s (+13.4% 🔺)2.427s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)39.355s (+22.5% 🔺)41.407s (+24.6% 🔺)2.052s31.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.193s (-2.4%)2.007s (~)0.814s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.205s (-0.5%)2.008s (~)0.803s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.207s (-5.4% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.799s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.230s (+3.8%)2.006s (~)0.776s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s (-7.8% 🟢)2.005s (~)0.747s151.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.267s (-3.1%)2.008s (~)0.741s151.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.329s (+4.2%)3.867s (+6.1% 🔺)1.538s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.425s (-41.9% 🟢)4.077s (-27.4% 🟢)1.652s81.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.689s (-5.3% 🟢)4.438s (+3.5%)1.749s71.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.394s (-2.0%)2.269s (+5.5% 🔺)0.875s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.431s (+1.2%)2.318s (-3.1%)0.887s131.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.540s (-2.6%)2.223s (-4.1%)0.683s141.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.716s (-2.5%)2.006s (-6.8% 🟢)0.290s151.23x
💻 LocalNitro1.761s (~)2.006s (-3.2%)0.245s151.26x
💻 LocalExpress1.991s (-3.5%)2.394s (-4.6%)0.403s131.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.210s (-44.7% 🟢)5.076s (-29.4% 🟢)1.866s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro3.399s (+21.7% 🔺)4.984s (+15.1% 🔺)1.585s71.06x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.466s (+42.0% 🔺)6.037s (+31.9% 🔺)1.571s51.39x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.815s (+11.7% 🔺)3.887s (-6.0% 🟢)2.073s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.971s (+20.9% 🔺)3.583s (-10.7% 🟢)1.612s91.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.544s (+10.2% 🔺)4.268s (+6.3% 🔺)0.724s81.95x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.335s (-6.3% 🟢)5.011s (~)0.676s62.39x
💻 LocalNitro4.920s (+9.3% 🔺)5.349s (+3.2%)0.428s62.71x
💻 LocalExpress5.499s (-2.7%)6.214s (+3.3%)0.716s53.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.535s (+13.5% 🔺)5.797s (+26.3% 🔺)2.261s61.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.951s (-33.5% 🟢)5.513s (-25.4% 🟢)1.562s61.12x
▲ VercelNitro4.368s (+9.6% 🔺)6.104s (+2.8%)1.736s61.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.199s (-1.5%)2.008s (~)0.809s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.289s (+5.3% 🔺)2.009s (~)0.720s151.08x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.307s (+1.2%)2.007s (~)0.700s151.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.349s (-0.9%)2.006s (~)0.657s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.458s (-5.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.550s151.22x
💻 LocalExpress1.587s (+2.6%)2.007s (~)0.419s151.32x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.356s (-28.1% 🟢)4.014s (-19.9% 🟢)1.658s81.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.775s (-28.5% 🟢)4.260s (-17.6% 🟢)1.485s81.18x
▲ VercelExpress3.065s (+10.2% 🔺)4.878s (+18.3% 🔺)1.813s71.30x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.437s (+6.6% 🔺)2.230s (+3.6%)0.793s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s (~)2.141s (~)0.608s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.582s (+10.8% 🔺)2.675s (+20.3% 🔺)1.093s121.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.943s (-5.4% 🟢)2.292s (-18.9% 🟢)0.349s141.35x
💻 LocalNitro2.132s (+17.7% 🔺)2.591s (+16.5% 🔺)0.459s121.48x
💻 LocalExpress2.387s (+10.8% 🔺)2.918s (+12.5% 🔺)0.530s111.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.924s (-26.1% 🟢)4.803s (-14.4% 🟢)1.879s71.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.955s (-50.8% 🟢)4.728s (-37.3% 🟢)1.773s71.01x
▲ VercelExpress3.141s (-58.4% 🟢)5.306s (-40.3% 🟢)2.166s61.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.595s (-4.5%)3.766s (-12.5% 🟢)2.172s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.690s (-18.0% 🟢)3.761s (-9.2% 🟢)2.072s81.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.109s (+24.6% 🔺)5.013s (+24.9% 🔺)0.904s62.58x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.723s (-6.2% 🟢)5.343s (-3.1%)0.620s62.96x
💻 LocalNitro5.876s (+8.2% 🔺)6.418s (+9.7% 🔺)0.542s53.68x
💻 LocalExpress6.316s (+3.6%)6.819s (+3.1%)0.503s53.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.333s (-48.9% 🟢)5.237s (-36.0% 🟢)1.903s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.018s (-61.0% 🟢)5.716s (-51.8% 🟢)1.697s61.21x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.668s (+42.9% 🔺)6.481s (+33.7% 🔺)1.814s51.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.588s (~)1.005s (~)0.417s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.614s (+6.1% 🔺)1.059s (+5.2% 🔺)0.445s571.04x
💻 LocalExpress0.652s (+6.9% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.353s601.11x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.703s (-19.4% 🟢)1.022s (-1.7%)0.318s591.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.732s (+29.2% 🔺)1.129s (+12.2% 🔺)0.397s541.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.856s (+6.3% 🔺)1.040s (+3.4%)0.184s581.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.697s (-8.5% 🟢)6.481s (-7.1% 🟢)1.784s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.010s (-5.1% 🟢)6.696s (-0.8%)1.686s91.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.418s (+6.4% 🔺)7.228s (+5.5% 🔺)1.810s91.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.339s (-4.5%)2.030s (+1.1%)0.690s451.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.513s (+0.7%)2.006s (~)0.493s451.13x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.604s (+10.8% 🔺)2.132s (+3.9%)0.528s431.20x
💻 LocalExpress1.616s (+6.1% 🔺)2.007s (~)0.391s451.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.676s (-21.3% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.331s451.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.968s (+3.0%)2.251s (+8.5% 🔺)0.283s411.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro12.141s (-13.4% 🟢)13.695s (-16.0% 🟢)1.554s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress12.341s (~)14.549s (+2.4%)2.209s71.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.105s (-20.0% 🟢)15.264s (-15.8% 🟢)2.159s61.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.703s (-1.2%)3.111s (+2.6%)0.408s391.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.806s (+1.7%)3.404s (+8.5% 🔺)0.598s361.04x
💻 LocalNitro3.335s (+3.5%)3.976s (-0.8%)0.641s311.23x
💻 LocalExpress3.419s (+3.0%)4.042s (+0.8%)0.624s301.26x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.625s (-16.6% 🟢)4.042s (-19.3% 🟢)0.417s301.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.859s (-0.6%)4.076s (-2.5%)0.217s301.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro23.984s (-22.3% 🟢)25.857s (-21.4% 🟢)1.873s51.00x
▲ VercelExpress24.791s (-9.0% 🟢)27.182s (-5.7% 🟢)2.391s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)26.311s (-12.0% 🟢)28.173s (-11.5% 🟢)1.862s51.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.240s (-4.6%)1.006s (~)0.767s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.297s (-3.5%)1.006s (-1.7%)0.709s601.24x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.363s (+45.0% 🔺)1.022s (+1.6%)0.659s591.51x
💻 LocalNitro0.435s (+9.3% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.569s601.82x
💻 LocalExpress0.444s (+13.4% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.561s601.85x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.551s (-4.6%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.470s592.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.000s (+6.1% 🔺)3.453s (-16.4% 🟢)1.453s181.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.020s (-11.6% 🟢)3.965s (+1.1%)1.945s161.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.085s (-15.6% 🟢)3.906s (-4.1%)1.821s161.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.391s (-7.3% 🟢)1.028s (-3.4%)0.638s881.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.470s (+12.5% 🔺)1.053s (+1.2%)0.583s861.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.562s (+1.7%)1.066s (+1.2%)0.504s851.44x
💻 LocalExpress2.144s (-0.9%)2.737s (+0.8%)0.593s335.49x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.284s (-6.5% 🟢)2.977s (-6.5% 🟢)0.693s315.85x
💻 LocalNitro2.295s (+8.3% 🔺)2.912s (+9.6% 🔺)0.617s315.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.518s (-9.1% 🟢)4.300s (+0.7%)1.782s211.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.698s (~)4.162s (-6.3% 🟢)1.464s221.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.065s (+6.4% 🔺)4.810s (+8.8% 🔺)1.745s191.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.763s (-9.1% 🟢)1.270s (-16.5% 🟢)0.507s951.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.830s (+2.2%)1.366s (-13.9% 🟢)0.536s881.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.700s (+4.0%)3.575s (+3.9%)0.875s343.54x
💻 LocalNitro9.704s (+3.8%)10.111s (+1.6%)0.408s1212.72x
💻 LocalExpress9.919s (+1.2%)10.446s (+0.8%)0.526s1213.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s (+5.0% 🔺)11.577s (+5.0%)0.921s1113.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express6.128s (-22.0% 🟢)7.798s (-15.6% 🟢)1.670s161.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.371s (~)7.949s (-5.1% 🟢)1.578s161.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.568s (-14.7% 🟢)8.365s (-10.3% 🟢)1.797s151.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.162s (-0.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (-7.7% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.850s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.163s (~)2.005s (~)0.011s (+6.1% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.854s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.168s (-3.3%)2.003s (~)0.010s (-2.9%)2.017s (~)0.849s101.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.171s (~)2.005s (~)0.013s (+2.4%)2.020s (~)0.849s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.228s (-3.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (+10.0% 🔺)2.010s (~)0.783s101.06x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.273s (+9.0% 🔺)1.991s (~)0.011s (+660.0% 🔺)2.052s (+2.1%)0.779s101.10x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.486s (+18.8% 🔺)3.711s (+23.9% 🔺)0.847s (-26.9% 🟢)4.965s (+9.1% 🔺)2.479s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.562s (-21.7% 🟢)3.764s (-18.4% 🟢)0.852s (+25.7% 🔺)5.158s (-11.2% 🟢)2.596s101.03x
▲ VercelExpress2.716s (+2.8%)4.004s (+9.2% 🔺)0.568s (-37.9% 🟢)5.270s (+5.9% 🔺)2.554s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.576s (-1.7%)2.007s (~)0.005s (~)2.026s (~)0.450s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (~)2.011s (~)0.012s (-16.4% 🟢)2.024s (~)0.447s301.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.589s (-0.5%)2.010s (~)0.013s (+6.4% 🔺)2.025s (~)0.436s301.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.628s (-6.6% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.014s (+10.9% 🔺)2.026s (~)0.399s301.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.761s (~)2.010s (~)0.005s (-1.3%)2.025s (~)0.264s301.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.006s (+26.0% 🔺)2.395s (+19.5% 🔺)0.004s (-18.1% 🟢)2.446s (+20.7% 🔺)0.439s251.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)6.178s (-4.6%)7.431s (-3.3%)0.206s (+26.3% 🔺)8.158s (-1.7%)1.980s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.448s (+4.7%)8.058s (+2.0%)0.155s (-18.2% 🟢)8.655s (+0.7%)2.208s71.04x
▲ VercelExpress6.540s8.098s0.219s8.772s2.232s71.06x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.700s (-11.7% 🟢)1.029s (-1.8%)0.000s (-1.7%)1.042s (-2.4%)0.341s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.060s (+5.0%)1.581s (+8.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)1.588s (+8.7% 🔺)0.528s381.51x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.212s (+58.9% 🔺)1.681s (+63.3% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)1.724s (+64.0% 🔺)0.512s351.73x
💻 LocalNitro1.394s (-1.7%)2.013s (~)0.000s (+20.0% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.621s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.416s (+2.6%)2.014s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.600s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.419s (-5.7% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.000s (-7.7% 🟢)2.016s (~)0.597s302.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.686s (-40.0% 🟢)3.822s (-34.2% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)4.294s (-31.0% 🟢)1.608s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.898s (+2.1%)4.249s (+3.1%)0.000s (NaN%)4.799s (+4.8%)1.901s131.08x
▲ VercelNitro2.914s (-12.9% 🟢)4.173s (-10.8% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)4.591s (-11.3% 🟢)1.676s141.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.766s (+8.3% 🔺)2.306s (+7.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.337s (+7.0% 🔺)0.571s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.248s (+13.5% 🔺)2.776s (+15.6% 🔺)0.000s (+13.6% 🔺)2.782s (+15.5% 🔺)0.535s221.27x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.546s (+57.5% 🔺)3.161s (+47.8% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)3.204s (+48.9% 🔺)0.658s191.44x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.908s (-3.3%)3.553s (+0.8%)0.000s (-32.6% 🟢)3.556s (+0.8%)0.648s171.65x
💻 LocalNitro3.042s (-1.2%)3.775s (~)0.001s (+44.4% 🔺)3.780s (~)0.738s161.72x
💻 LocalExpress3.128s (-2.4%)3.901s (-3.2%)0.000s (-40.3% 🟢)3.904s (-3.2%)0.776s161.77x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.346s (-2.7%)5.557s (-9.6% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.013s (-10.1% 🟢)1.667s101.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.351s (-20.0% 🟢)5.807s (-15.3% 🟢)0.004s (+1520.0% 🔺)6.281s (-13.9% 🟢)1.929s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.033s (-12.0% 🟢)6.381s (-6.8% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.856s (-5.6% 🟢)1.824s91.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalNitro12/21
🐘 PostgresNitro18/21
▲ VercelNitro9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres13/21
Next.js (Turbopack)💻 Local11/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production138702191606
✅ 💻 Local Development182502192044
✅ 📦 Local Production182502192044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres181102332044
✅ 🪟 Windows14600146
✅ 📋 Other84401781022
Total7838010688906

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro120026
✅ example120026
✅ express120026
✅ fastify120026
✅ hono120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack14402
✅ nextjs-webpack14402
✅ nitro120026
✅ nuxt120026
✅ sveltekit13907
✅ vite120026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable120026
✅ express-stable120026
✅ fastify-stable120026
✅ hono-stable120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nitro-stable120026
✅ nuxt-stable120026
✅ sveltekit-stable13907
✅ vite-stable120026
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack14600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable120026
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-120026
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start120026

📋 View full workflow run

@socket-security

socket-securityBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

DiffPackageSupply Chain
Security
VulnerabilityQualityMaintenanceLicense
Addednpm/​esbuild@​0.28.1911007391100

View full report

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the workspace’s esbuild dependency to ^0.28.1 to address GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr, propagating the bump via the pnpm catalog and updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump esbuild in the pnpm catalog from ^0.27.3 to ^0.28.1.
  • Re-resolve pnpm-lock.yaml to incorporate esbuild@0.28.1 and its platform binaries.
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
pnpm-workspace.yamlUpdates the pnpm catalog to use esbuild: ^0.28.1.
pnpm-lock.yamlUpdates lockfile resolutions to include esbuild@0.28.1 and related dependency graph changes.
.changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.mdAdds a patch changeset for publishable consumers impacted by the bump.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 36 to +38
esbuild:
specifier: ^0.27.3
version: 0.27.7
specifier: ^0.28.1
version: 0.28.1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that 0.27.7 lingers transitively. I tried both remediation paths:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet. vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) still pins ^0.27.3, both of which exclude 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as a breaking bump). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this — too risky for the example workbenches.
  2. Force a pnpm override (esbuild: ^0.28.1) — this does unify everything on 0.28.1, but it breaks @workflow/web's production build: react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment ... is not supported yet on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine. So the override regresses a published, deployed package, and I reverted it.

Given the advisory's exploitable path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts; the Node install path already verifies integrity) and the remaining copies are build-time-only dev tooling (vite/astro/fumadocs), the residual risk is negligible. The flagged direct dependency in packages/builders — the subject of the advisory — is on 0.28.1. I've left the transitive copies rather than ship a broken build; they'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +11899 to +11905
hasBin: true

esbuild@0.28.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-HrJrvZv5ayxBzPfwphOoNzkzOIIlifzk0KJrGK2c8R4+LKpMtpYLQeUdjnwjWv/LZlkH2laZk+4w78pi99D4Vw==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on the churn — fixed in 991f628. Re-resolving the lockfile now drops esbuild@0.28.0 entirely: nitropack@2.13.4 (which declares esbuild: ^0.28.0) consolidates onto 0.28.1, so only 0.28.1 plus the upstream-pinned 0.27.7 remain.

Minor correction: 0.28.0 wasn't actually orphaned in the prior revision — it was still referenced by nitropack@2.13.4 — but that's moot now that it's gone.

The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 011d482 into mainJun 13, 2026
121 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/esbuild-0.28.1 branch June 13, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed for 011d482 due to a workflow error (backport job run).

This is usually an infrastructure problem (e.g. the configured AI model could not be found, an AI Gateway error, or an opencode crash) rather than a merge conflict. Check the job logs linked above for details.

Once the underlying issue is fixed, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

011d482808793e8deb0e8523a9c16af129490ee6

github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
* fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)
Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(ci): exclude esbuild from minimumReleaseAge gate
The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranay Prakash <pranay.gp@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2404. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

VaguelySerious pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2026
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
…-stable
* origin/stable:
[test] Fix stable e2e hookGetConflict test to use waitForHookState (#2405)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399) (#2401)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395) (#2404)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
* origin/main:
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
* origin/main:
Small detail panel cleanup (#2459)
Fix lazy Next workflow HMR (#2438)
Prevent peer dependency-only major bumps (#2437)
fix(changesets): only major-bump peer dependents when out of range (#2439)
Version Packages (beta) (#2428)
otel: explicit traceparent injection + linked-trace mode for bounded per-invocation traces (#2363)
[next] Clarify `serverExternalPackages` warning (#2417)
Add .swc gitignore handling to builder (#2427)
Version Packages (beta) (#2390)
[ci] Increase dev.test.ts cleanup hook timeout (#2416)
[world-vercel] Switch event endpoints to v4 wire format (#2055)
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
test: e2e coverage for run-idempotency conflict-handling strategies (#2387)
# Conflicts:
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranaygp@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) by pranaygp · Pull Request #2395 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) - #2395

Merged
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#2395
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygppranaygp commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Must be backported to stable (4.x) post-merge

This PR must be backported to the stable branch after merge. The stable (4.x) branch carries the identical esbuild: ^0.27.3 catalog entry and the same packages/builders consumer, so it is affected by the same advisory. The included changeset uses a patch bump precisely so the backport publishes a 4.x patch release. If the automated backport action declines or conflicts, force it via workflow_dispatch on .github/workflows/backport.yml.

Resolves Linear VULN-11749.

What this fixes

Socket / GitHub advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr"Missing binary integrity verification … enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY" (High, CVSS 8.1). Affected range >= 0.17.0 < 0.28.1; fixed in 0.28.1.

This bumps the pnpm catalog entry for esbuild from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1. Every workspace package that depends on esbuild references it via catalog:@workflow/builders, @workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root dev dependency — so the single catalog change propagates to all of them, and the flagged direct dependency in packages/builders now resolves to 0.28.1.

Honest risk assessment

The advisory is real and correctly flagged, but the exploitable code path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts downloaded the native binary without SHA-256 verification when NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY is set). The Node.js install path already verified integrity, and this repo is a Node.js/pnpm project that never uses esbuild's Deno distribution — so practical exploitability here is low. Regardless, 0.27.7 is in the affected npm range, it's a direct dependency of packages/builders, and the remediation is free, so upgrading is correct and clears the alert. (esbuild 0.28.0/0.28.1 exist specifically to add these integrity checks.)

Transitive esbuild copies (why some 0.27.7 remains)

0.27.7 still appears transitively under build-time-only dev tooling in the example workbenches (vite, astro, fumadocs). I tried both ways to remove it:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet: vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) pins ^0.27.3, both excluding 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as breaking). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this.
  2. Force a pnpm override — unifies everything on 0.28.1, but breaks @workflow/web's build (react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with "Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment … is not supported yet" on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine). Reverted.

Since the vuln path is Deno-only and these are build-time dev tooling, the residual risk is negligible. They'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges. (Re-resolving did drop the redundant 0.28.0 — nitropack consolidated onto 0.28.1.)

CI: minimumReleaseAge fix

The canary E2E jobs run pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (they mutate the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hit the workspace's 48h minimumReleaseAge gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1 (ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION). Fixed by adding esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude — pnpm's recommended remedy, consistent with the existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions. --frozen-lockfile jobs (Build Packages, stable E2E) were unaffected and already passed.

Changes

  • pnpm-workspace.yaml: esbuild catalog ^0.27.3^0.28.1; add esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: re-resolved esbuild graph to 0.28.1 (diff scoped entirely to esbuild + @esbuild/*)
  • .changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.md: patch bump for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli

Verification

  • @workflow/builders builds and all 170 tests pass against 0.28.1 (exercises the esbuild.build() API directly).
  • @workflow/web builds cleanly (confirming the override revert).
  • pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (the canary install mode) now completes with no age-gate error and a stable lockfile.
  • esbuild changelog confirms no JS API signature changes in 0.28.x — only install-time integrity checks plus minor codegen fixes.

Note: the only currently-failing check, E2E Vercel Prod Tests (fastify), is an unrelated flaky abort test (AbortController > abortFromStepWorkflow, 119 passed / 1 failed) — a distributed-abort timing test against a live preview, not affected by an esbuild version bump.

Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2026 06:06
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 13, 2026 06:06
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 991f628

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.040s (-10.1% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.965s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.044s (~)1.007s (~)0.962s101.10x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.053s (-16.4% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.960s101.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.054s (-13.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.952s101.35x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.065s (-2.3%)1.012s (~)0.947s101.61x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.068s (+1.6%)1.012s (~)0.944s101.69x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.269s (-55.9% 🟢)2.408s (-2.5%)2.139s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro0.409s (+14.3% 🔺)2.538s (-2.1%)2.129s101.52x
▲ VercelExpress0.450s (+48.3% 🔺)2.745s (+24.2% 🔺)2.295s101.67x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.091s (~)2.006s (~)0.915s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.101s (~)2.007s (~)0.906s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.106s (~)2.011s (~)0.905s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.106s (~)2.013s (~)0.907s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.113s (-2.6%)2.006s (~)0.893s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.148s (+0.6%)2.010s (~)0.862s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.681s (-21.9% 🟢)3.444s (-14.2% 🟢)1.763s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress1.755s (+1.1%)4.086s (+23.8% 🔺)2.331s101.04x
▲ VercelNitro1.836s (+4.1%)3.705s (-4.0%)1.868s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.508s (~)11.022s (~)0.514s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.555s (~)11.017s (~)0.462s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.560s (~)11.023s (~)0.462s31.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.656s (-1.1%)11.023s (~)0.367s31.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.749s (+1.9%)11.020s (~)0.272s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.869s (~)11.018s (~)0.150s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro15.115s (+8.2% 🔺)17.194s (+9.2% 🔺)2.079s21.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)15.331s (+5.8% 🔺)16.760s (+3.3%)1.429s21.01x
▲ VercelExpress15.575s (+7.8% 🔺)17.240s (+12.0% 🔺)1.664s21.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro13.692s (~)14.027s (~)0.335s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.801s (~)14.028s (~)0.227s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.962s (~)14.221s (+1.4%)0.258s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.107s (-1.7%)15.030s (~)0.923s41.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.120s (+2.2%)14.626s (+4.3%)0.506s51.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.580s (+1.2%)15.024s (~)0.444s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express25.201s (+23.3% 🔺)27.562s (+25.7% 🔺)2.361s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro26.340s (+8.1% 🔺)27.894s (+6.3% 🔺)1.555s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)27.027s (+24.1% 🔺)28.718s (+18.1% 🔺)1.692s31.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro12.423s (-1.6%)13.017s (~)0.594s71.00x
💻 LocalExpress12.571s (~)13.026s (~)0.455s71.01x
💻 LocalNitro12.685s (+2.5%)13.170s (+1.1%)0.485s71.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.985s (-6.1% 🟢)13.310s (-6.1% 🟢)0.326s71.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.748s (+9.3% 🔺)14.162s (+8.8% 🔺)0.414s71.11x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.760s (-2.2%)14.018s (-3.9%)0.258s71.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro35.523s (+20.3% 🔺)38.316s (+18.5% 🔺)2.793s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress37.263s (+11.1% 🔺)39.690s (+13.4% 🔺)2.427s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)39.355s (+22.5% 🔺)41.407s (+24.6% 🔺)2.052s31.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.193s (-2.4%)2.007s (~)0.814s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.205s (-0.5%)2.008s (~)0.803s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.207s (-5.4% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.799s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.230s (+3.8%)2.006s (~)0.776s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s (-7.8% 🟢)2.005s (~)0.747s151.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.267s (-3.1%)2.008s (~)0.741s151.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.329s (+4.2%)3.867s (+6.1% 🔺)1.538s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.425s (-41.9% 🟢)4.077s (-27.4% 🟢)1.652s81.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.689s (-5.3% 🟢)4.438s (+3.5%)1.749s71.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.394s (-2.0%)2.269s (+5.5% 🔺)0.875s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.431s (+1.2%)2.318s (-3.1%)0.887s131.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.540s (-2.6%)2.223s (-4.1%)0.683s141.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.716s (-2.5%)2.006s (-6.8% 🟢)0.290s151.23x
💻 LocalNitro1.761s (~)2.006s (-3.2%)0.245s151.26x
💻 LocalExpress1.991s (-3.5%)2.394s (-4.6%)0.403s131.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.210s (-44.7% 🟢)5.076s (-29.4% 🟢)1.866s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro3.399s (+21.7% 🔺)4.984s (+15.1% 🔺)1.585s71.06x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.466s (+42.0% 🔺)6.037s (+31.9% 🔺)1.571s51.39x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.815s (+11.7% 🔺)3.887s (-6.0% 🟢)2.073s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.971s (+20.9% 🔺)3.583s (-10.7% 🟢)1.612s91.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.544s (+10.2% 🔺)4.268s (+6.3% 🔺)0.724s81.95x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.335s (-6.3% 🟢)5.011s (~)0.676s62.39x
💻 LocalNitro4.920s (+9.3% 🔺)5.349s (+3.2%)0.428s62.71x
💻 LocalExpress5.499s (-2.7%)6.214s (+3.3%)0.716s53.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.535s (+13.5% 🔺)5.797s (+26.3% 🔺)2.261s61.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.951s (-33.5% 🟢)5.513s (-25.4% 🟢)1.562s61.12x
▲ VercelNitro4.368s (+9.6% 🔺)6.104s (+2.8%)1.736s61.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.199s (-1.5%)2.008s (~)0.809s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.289s (+5.3% 🔺)2.009s (~)0.720s151.08x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.307s (+1.2%)2.007s (~)0.700s151.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.349s (-0.9%)2.006s (~)0.657s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.458s (-5.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.550s151.22x
💻 LocalExpress1.587s (+2.6%)2.007s (~)0.419s151.32x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.356s (-28.1% 🟢)4.014s (-19.9% 🟢)1.658s81.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.775s (-28.5% 🟢)4.260s (-17.6% 🟢)1.485s81.18x
▲ VercelExpress3.065s (+10.2% 🔺)4.878s (+18.3% 🔺)1.813s71.30x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.437s (+6.6% 🔺)2.230s (+3.6%)0.793s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s (~)2.141s (~)0.608s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.582s (+10.8% 🔺)2.675s (+20.3% 🔺)1.093s121.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.943s (-5.4% 🟢)2.292s (-18.9% 🟢)0.349s141.35x
💻 LocalNitro2.132s (+17.7% 🔺)2.591s (+16.5% 🔺)0.459s121.48x
💻 LocalExpress2.387s (+10.8% 🔺)2.918s (+12.5% 🔺)0.530s111.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.924s (-26.1% 🟢)4.803s (-14.4% 🟢)1.879s71.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.955s (-50.8% 🟢)4.728s (-37.3% 🟢)1.773s71.01x
▲ VercelExpress3.141s (-58.4% 🟢)5.306s (-40.3% 🟢)2.166s61.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.595s (-4.5%)3.766s (-12.5% 🟢)2.172s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.690s (-18.0% 🟢)3.761s (-9.2% 🟢)2.072s81.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.109s (+24.6% 🔺)5.013s (+24.9% 🔺)0.904s62.58x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.723s (-6.2% 🟢)5.343s (-3.1%)0.620s62.96x
💻 LocalNitro5.876s (+8.2% 🔺)6.418s (+9.7% 🔺)0.542s53.68x
💻 LocalExpress6.316s (+3.6%)6.819s (+3.1%)0.503s53.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.333s (-48.9% 🟢)5.237s (-36.0% 🟢)1.903s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.018s (-61.0% 🟢)5.716s (-51.8% 🟢)1.697s61.21x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.668s (+42.9% 🔺)6.481s (+33.7% 🔺)1.814s51.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.588s (~)1.005s (~)0.417s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.614s (+6.1% 🔺)1.059s (+5.2% 🔺)0.445s571.04x
💻 LocalExpress0.652s (+6.9% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.353s601.11x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.703s (-19.4% 🟢)1.022s (-1.7%)0.318s591.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.732s (+29.2% 🔺)1.129s (+12.2% 🔺)0.397s541.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.856s (+6.3% 🔺)1.040s (+3.4%)0.184s581.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.697s (-8.5% 🟢)6.481s (-7.1% 🟢)1.784s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.010s (-5.1% 🟢)6.696s (-0.8%)1.686s91.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.418s (+6.4% 🔺)7.228s (+5.5% 🔺)1.810s91.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.339s (-4.5%)2.030s (+1.1%)0.690s451.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.513s (+0.7%)2.006s (~)0.493s451.13x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.604s (+10.8% 🔺)2.132s (+3.9%)0.528s431.20x
💻 LocalExpress1.616s (+6.1% 🔺)2.007s (~)0.391s451.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.676s (-21.3% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.331s451.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.968s (+3.0%)2.251s (+8.5% 🔺)0.283s411.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro12.141s (-13.4% 🟢)13.695s (-16.0% 🟢)1.554s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress12.341s (~)14.549s (+2.4%)2.209s71.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.105s (-20.0% 🟢)15.264s (-15.8% 🟢)2.159s61.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.703s (-1.2%)3.111s (+2.6%)0.408s391.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.806s (+1.7%)3.404s (+8.5% 🔺)0.598s361.04x
💻 LocalNitro3.335s (+3.5%)3.976s (-0.8%)0.641s311.23x
💻 LocalExpress3.419s (+3.0%)4.042s (+0.8%)0.624s301.26x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.625s (-16.6% 🟢)4.042s (-19.3% 🟢)0.417s301.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.859s (-0.6%)4.076s (-2.5%)0.217s301.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro23.984s (-22.3% 🟢)25.857s (-21.4% 🟢)1.873s51.00x
▲ VercelExpress24.791s (-9.0% 🟢)27.182s (-5.7% 🟢)2.391s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)26.311s (-12.0% 🟢)28.173s (-11.5% 🟢)1.862s51.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.240s (-4.6%)1.006s (~)0.767s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.297s (-3.5%)1.006s (-1.7%)0.709s601.24x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.363s (+45.0% 🔺)1.022s (+1.6%)0.659s591.51x
💻 LocalNitro0.435s (+9.3% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.569s601.82x
💻 LocalExpress0.444s (+13.4% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.561s601.85x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.551s (-4.6%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.470s592.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.000s (+6.1% 🔺)3.453s (-16.4% 🟢)1.453s181.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.020s (-11.6% 🟢)3.965s (+1.1%)1.945s161.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.085s (-15.6% 🟢)3.906s (-4.1%)1.821s161.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.391s (-7.3% 🟢)1.028s (-3.4%)0.638s881.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.470s (+12.5% 🔺)1.053s (+1.2%)0.583s861.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.562s (+1.7%)1.066s (+1.2%)0.504s851.44x
💻 LocalExpress2.144s (-0.9%)2.737s (+0.8%)0.593s335.49x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.284s (-6.5% 🟢)2.977s (-6.5% 🟢)0.693s315.85x
💻 LocalNitro2.295s (+8.3% 🔺)2.912s (+9.6% 🔺)0.617s315.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.518s (-9.1% 🟢)4.300s (+0.7%)1.782s211.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.698s (~)4.162s (-6.3% 🟢)1.464s221.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.065s (+6.4% 🔺)4.810s (+8.8% 🔺)1.745s191.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.763s (-9.1% 🟢)1.270s (-16.5% 🟢)0.507s951.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.830s (+2.2%)1.366s (-13.9% 🟢)0.536s881.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.700s (+4.0%)3.575s (+3.9%)0.875s343.54x
💻 LocalNitro9.704s (+3.8%)10.111s (+1.6%)0.408s1212.72x
💻 LocalExpress9.919s (+1.2%)10.446s (+0.8%)0.526s1213.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s (+5.0% 🔺)11.577s (+5.0%)0.921s1113.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express6.128s (-22.0% 🟢)7.798s (-15.6% 🟢)1.670s161.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.371s (~)7.949s (-5.1% 🟢)1.578s161.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.568s (-14.7% 🟢)8.365s (-10.3% 🟢)1.797s151.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.162s (-0.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (-7.7% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.850s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.163s (~)2.005s (~)0.011s (+6.1% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.854s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.168s (-3.3%)2.003s (~)0.010s (-2.9%)2.017s (~)0.849s101.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.171s (~)2.005s (~)0.013s (+2.4%)2.020s (~)0.849s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.228s (-3.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (+10.0% 🔺)2.010s (~)0.783s101.06x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.273s (+9.0% 🔺)1.991s (~)0.011s (+660.0% 🔺)2.052s (+2.1%)0.779s101.10x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.486s (+18.8% 🔺)3.711s (+23.9% 🔺)0.847s (-26.9% 🟢)4.965s (+9.1% 🔺)2.479s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.562s (-21.7% 🟢)3.764s (-18.4% 🟢)0.852s (+25.7% 🔺)5.158s (-11.2% 🟢)2.596s101.03x
▲ VercelExpress2.716s (+2.8%)4.004s (+9.2% 🔺)0.568s (-37.9% 🟢)5.270s (+5.9% 🔺)2.554s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.576s (-1.7%)2.007s (~)0.005s (~)2.026s (~)0.450s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (~)2.011s (~)0.012s (-16.4% 🟢)2.024s (~)0.447s301.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.589s (-0.5%)2.010s (~)0.013s (+6.4% 🔺)2.025s (~)0.436s301.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.628s (-6.6% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.014s (+10.9% 🔺)2.026s (~)0.399s301.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.761s (~)2.010s (~)0.005s (-1.3%)2.025s (~)0.264s301.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.006s (+26.0% 🔺)2.395s (+19.5% 🔺)0.004s (-18.1% 🟢)2.446s (+20.7% 🔺)0.439s251.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)6.178s (-4.6%)7.431s (-3.3%)0.206s (+26.3% 🔺)8.158s (-1.7%)1.980s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.448s (+4.7%)8.058s (+2.0%)0.155s (-18.2% 🟢)8.655s (+0.7%)2.208s71.04x
▲ VercelExpress6.540s8.098s0.219s8.772s2.232s71.06x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.700s (-11.7% 🟢)1.029s (-1.8%)0.000s (-1.7%)1.042s (-2.4%)0.341s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.060s (+5.0%)1.581s (+8.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)1.588s (+8.7% 🔺)0.528s381.51x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.212s (+58.9% 🔺)1.681s (+63.3% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)1.724s (+64.0% 🔺)0.512s351.73x
💻 LocalNitro1.394s (-1.7%)2.013s (~)0.000s (+20.0% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.621s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.416s (+2.6%)2.014s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.600s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.419s (-5.7% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.000s (-7.7% 🟢)2.016s (~)0.597s302.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.686s (-40.0% 🟢)3.822s (-34.2% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)4.294s (-31.0% 🟢)1.608s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.898s (+2.1%)4.249s (+3.1%)0.000s (NaN%)4.799s (+4.8%)1.901s131.08x
▲ VercelNitro2.914s (-12.9% 🟢)4.173s (-10.8% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)4.591s (-11.3% 🟢)1.676s141.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.766s (+8.3% 🔺)2.306s (+7.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.337s (+7.0% 🔺)0.571s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.248s (+13.5% 🔺)2.776s (+15.6% 🔺)0.000s (+13.6% 🔺)2.782s (+15.5% 🔺)0.535s221.27x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.546s (+57.5% 🔺)3.161s (+47.8% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)3.204s (+48.9% 🔺)0.658s191.44x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.908s (-3.3%)3.553s (+0.8%)0.000s (-32.6% 🟢)3.556s (+0.8%)0.648s171.65x
💻 LocalNitro3.042s (-1.2%)3.775s (~)0.001s (+44.4% 🔺)3.780s (~)0.738s161.72x
💻 LocalExpress3.128s (-2.4%)3.901s (-3.2%)0.000s (-40.3% 🟢)3.904s (-3.2%)0.776s161.77x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.346s (-2.7%)5.557s (-9.6% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.013s (-10.1% 🟢)1.667s101.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.351s (-20.0% 🟢)5.807s (-15.3% 🟢)0.004s (+1520.0% 🔺)6.281s (-13.9% 🟢)1.929s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.033s (-12.0% 🟢)6.381s (-6.8% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.856s (-5.6% 🟢)1.824s91.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalNitro12/21
🐘 PostgresNitro18/21
▲ VercelNitro9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres13/21
Next.js (Turbopack)💻 Local11/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production138702191606
✅ 💻 Local Development182502192044
✅ 📦 Local Production182502192044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres181102332044
✅ 🪟 Windows14600146
✅ 📋 Other84401781022
Total7838010688906

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro120026
✅ example120026
✅ express120026
✅ fastify120026
✅ hono120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack14402
✅ nextjs-webpack14402
✅ nitro120026
✅ nuxt120026
✅ sveltekit13907
✅ vite120026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable120026
✅ express-stable120026
✅ fastify-stable120026
✅ hono-stable120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nitro-stable120026
✅ nuxt-stable120026
✅ sveltekit-stable13907
✅ vite-stable120026
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack14600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable120026
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-120026
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start120026

📋 View full workflow run

@socket-security

socket-securityBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

DiffPackageSupply Chain
Security
VulnerabilityQualityMaintenanceLicense
Addednpm/​esbuild@​0.28.1911007391100

View full report

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the workspace’s esbuild dependency to ^0.28.1 to address GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr, propagating the bump via the pnpm catalog and updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump esbuild in the pnpm catalog from ^0.27.3 to ^0.28.1.
  • Re-resolve pnpm-lock.yaml to incorporate esbuild@0.28.1 and its platform binaries.
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
pnpm-workspace.yamlUpdates the pnpm catalog to use esbuild: ^0.28.1.
pnpm-lock.yamlUpdates lockfile resolutions to include esbuild@0.28.1 and related dependency graph changes.
.changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.mdAdds a patch changeset for publishable consumers impacted by the bump.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 36 to +38
esbuild:
specifier: ^0.27.3
version: 0.27.7
specifier: ^0.28.1
version: 0.28.1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that 0.27.7 lingers transitively. I tried both remediation paths:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet. vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) still pins ^0.27.3, both of which exclude 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as a breaking bump). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this — too risky for the example workbenches.
  2. Force a pnpm override (esbuild: ^0.28.1) — this does unify everything on 0.28.1, but it breaks @workflow/web's production build: react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment ... is not supported yet on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine. So the override regresses a published, deployed package, and I reverted it.

Given the advisory's exploitable path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts; the Node install path already verifies integrity) and the remaining copies are build-time-only dev tooling (vite/astro/fumadocs), the residual risk is negligible. The flagged direct dependency in packages/builders — the subject of the advisory — is on 0.28.1. I've left the transitive copies rather than ship a broken build; they'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +11899 to +11905
hasBin: true

esbuild@0.28.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-HrJrvZv5ayxBzPfwphOoNzkzOIIlifzk0KJrGK2c8R4+LKpMtpYLQeUdjnwjWv/LZlkH2laZk+4w78pi99D4Vw==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on the churn — fixed in 991f628. Re-resolving the lockfile now drops esbuild@0.28.0 entirely: nitropack@2.13.4 (which declares esbuild: ^0.28.0) consolidates onto 0.28.1, so only 0.28.1 plus the upstream-pinned 0.27.7 remain.

Minor correction: 0.28.0 wasn't actually orphaned in the prior revision — it was still referenced by nitropack@2.13.4 — but that's moot now that it's gone.

The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 011d482 into mainJun 13, 2026
121 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/esbuild-0.28.1 branch June 13, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed for 011d482 due to a workflow error (backport job run).

This is usually an infrastructure problem (e.g. the configured AI model could not be found, an AI Gateway error, or an opencode crash) rather than a merge conflict. Check the job logs linked above for details.

Once the underlying issue is fixed, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

011d482808793e8deb0e8523a9c16af129490ee6

github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
* fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)
Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(ci): exclude esbuild from minimumReleaseAge gate
The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranay Prakash <pranay.gp@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2404. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

VaguelySerious pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2026
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
…-stable
* origin/stable:
[test] Fix stable e2e hookGetConflict test to use waitForHookState (#2405)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399) (#2401)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395) (#2404)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
* origin/main:
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
* origin/main:
Small detail panel cleanup (#2459)
Fix lazy Next workflow HMR (#2438)
Prevent peer dependency-only major bumps (#2437)
fix(changesets): only major-bump peer dependents when out of range (#2439)
Version Packages (beta) (#2428)
otel: explicit traceparent injection + linked-trace mode for bounded per-invocation traces (#2363)
[next] Clarify `serverExternalPackages` warning (#2417)
Add .swc gitignore handling to builder (#2427)
Version Packages (beta) (#2390)
[ci] Increase dev.test.ts cleanup hook timeout (#2416)
[world-vercel] Switch event endpoints to v4 wire format (#2055)
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
test: e2e coverage for run-idempotency conflict-handling strategies (#2387)
# Conflicts:
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranaygp@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) by pranaygp · Pull Request #2395 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) - #2395

Merged
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#2395
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygppranaygp commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Must be backported to stable (4.x) post-merge

This PR must be backported to the stable branch after merge. The stable (4.x) branch carries the identical esbuild: ^0.27.3 catalog entry and the same packages/builders consumer, so it is affected by the same advisory. The included changeset uses a patch bump precisely so the backport publishes a 4.x patch release. If the automated backport action declines or conflicts, force it via workflow_dispatch on .github/workflows/backport.yml.

Resolves Linear VULN-11749.

What this fixes

Socket / GitHub advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr"Missing binary integrity verification … enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY" (High, CVSS 8.1). Affected range >= 0.17.0 < 0.28.1; fixed in 0.28.1.

This bumps the pnpm catalog entry for esbuild from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1. Every workspace package that depends on esbuild references it via catalog:@workflow/builders, @workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root dev dependency — so the single catalog change propagates to all of them, and the flagged direct dependency in packages/builders now resolves to 0.28.1.

Honest risk assessment

The advisory is real and correctly flagged, but the exploitable code path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts downloaded the native binary without SHA-256 verification when NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY is set). The Node.js install path already verified integrity, and this repo is a Node.js/pnpm project that never uses esbuild's Deno distribution — so practical exploitability here is low. Regardless, 0.27.7 is in the affected npm range, it's a direct dependency of packages/builders, and the remediation is free, so upgrading is correct and clears the alert. (esbuild 0.28.0/0.28.1 exist specifically to add these integrity checks.)

Transitive esbuild copies (why some 0.27.7 remains)

0.27.7 still appears transitively under build-time-only dev tooling in the example workbenches (vite, astro, fumadocs). I tried both ways to remove it:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet: vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) pins ^0.27.3, both excluding 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as breaking). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this.
  2. Force a pnpm override — unifies everything on 0.28.1, but breaks @workflow/web's build (react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with "Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment … is not supported yet" on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine). Reverted.

Since the vuln path is Deno-only and these are build-time dev tooling, the residual risk is negligible. They'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges. (Re-resolving did drop the redundant 0.28.0 — nitropack consolidated onto 0.28.1.)

CI: minimumReleaseAge fix

The canary E2E jobs run pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (they mutate the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hit the workspace's 48h minimumReleaseAge gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1 (ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION). Fixed by adding esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude — pnpm's recommended remedy, consistent with the existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions. --frozen-lockfile jobs (Build Packages, stable E2E) were unaffected and already passed.

Changes

  • pnpm-workspace.yaml: esbuild catalog ^0.27.3^0.28.1; add esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: re-resolved esbuild graph to 0.28.1 (diff scoped entirely to esbuild + @esbuild/*)
  • .changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.md: patch bump for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli

Verification

  • @workflow/builders builds and all 170 tests pass against 0.28.1 (exercises the esbuild.build() API directly).
  • @workflow/web builds cleanly (confirming the override revert).
  • pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (the canary install mode) now completes with no age-gate error and a stable lockfile.
  • esbuild changelog confirms no JS API signature changes in 0.28.x — only install-time integrity checks plus minor codegen fixes.

Note: the only currently-failing check, E2E Vercel Prod Tests (fastify), is an unrelated flaky abort test (AbortController > abortFromStepWorkflow, 119 passed / 1 failed) — a distributed-abort timing test against a live preview, not affected by an esbuild version bump.

Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2026 06:06
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 13, 2026 06:06
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 991f628

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.040s (-10.1% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.965s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.044s (~)1.007s (~)0.962s101.10x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.053s (-16.4% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.960s101.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.054s (-13.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.952s101.35x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.065s (-2.3%)1.012s (~)0.947s101.61x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.068s (+1.6%)1.012s (~)0.944s101.69x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.269s (-55.9% 🟢)2.408s (-2.5%)2.139s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro0.409s (+14.3% 🔺)2.538s (-2.1%)2.129s101.52x
▲ VercelExpress0.450s (+48.3% 🔺)2.745s (+24.2% 🔺)2.295s101.67x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.091s (~)2.006s (~)0.915s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.101s (~)2.007s (~)0.906s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.106s (~)2.011s (~)0.905s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.106s (~)2.013s (~)0.907s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.113s (-2.6%)2.006s (~)0.893s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.148s (+0.6%)2.010s (~)0.862s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.681s (-21.9% 🟢)3.444s (-14.2% 🟢)1.763s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress1.755s (+1.1%)4.086s (+23.8% 🔺)2.331s101.04x
▲ VercelNitro1.836s (+4.1%)3.705s (-4.0%)1.868s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.508s (~)11.022s (~)0.514s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.555s (~)11.017s (~)0.462s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.560s (~)11.023s (~)0.462s31.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.656s (-1.1%)11.023s (~)0.367s31.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.749s (+1.9%)11.020s (~)0.272s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.869s (~)11.018s (~)0.150s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro15.115s (+8.2% 🔺)17.194s (+9.2% 🔺)2.079s21.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)15.331s (+5.8% 🔺)16.760s (+3.3%)1.429s21.01x
▲ VercelExpress15.575s (+7.8% 🔺)17.240s (+12.0% 🔺)1.664s21.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro13.692s (~)14.027s (~)0.335s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.801s (~)14.028s (~)0.227s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.962s (~)14.221s (+1.4%)0.258s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.107s (-1.7%)15.030s (~)0.923s41.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.120s (+2.2%)14.626s (+4.3%)0.506s51.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.580s (+1.2%)15.024s (~)0.444s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express25.201s (+23.3% 🔺)27.562s (+25.7% 🔺)2.361s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro26.340s (+8.1% 🔺)27.894s (+6.3% 🔺)1.555s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)27.027s (+24.1% 🔺)28.718s (+18.1% 🔺)1.692s31.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro12.423s (-1.6%)13.017s (~)0.594s71.00x
💻 LocalExpress12.571s (~)13.026s (~)0.455s71.01x
💻 LocalNitro12.685s (+2.5%)13.170s (+1.1%)0.485s71.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.985s (-6.1% 🟢)13.310s (-6.1% 🟢)0.326s71.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.748s (+9.3% 🔺)14.162s (+8.8% 🔺)0.414s71.11x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.760s (-2.2%)14.018s (-3.9%)0.258s71.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro35.523s (+20.3% 🔺)38.316s (+18.5% 🔺)2.793s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress37.263s (+11.1% 🔺)39.690s (+13.4% 🔺)2.427s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)39.355s (+22.5% 🔺)41.407s (+24.6% 🔺)2.052s31.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.193s (-2.4%)2.007s (~)0.814s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.205s (-0.5%)2.008s (~)0.803s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.207s (-5.4% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.799s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.230s (+3.8%)2.006s (~)0.776s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s (-7.8% 🟢)2.005s (~)0.747s151.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.267s (-3.1%)2.008s (~)0.741s151.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.329s (+4.2%)3.867s (+6.1% 🔺)1.538s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.425s (-41.9% 🟢)4.077s (-27.4% 🟢)1.652s81.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.689s (-5.3% 🟢)4.438s (+3.5%)1.749s71.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.394s (-2.0%)2.269s (+5.5% 🔺)0.875s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.431s (+1.2%)2.318s (-3.1%)0.887s131.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.540s (-2.6%)2.223s (-4.1%)0.683s141.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.716s (-2.5%)2.006s (-6.8% 🟢)0.290s151.23x
💻 LocalNitro1.761s (~)2.006s (-3.2%)0.245s151.26x
💻 LocalExpress1.991s (-3.5%)2.394s (-4.6%)0.403s131.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.210s (-44.7% 🟢)5.076s (-29.4% 🟢)1.866s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro3.399s (+21.7% 🔺)4.984s (+15.1% 🔺)1.585s71.06x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.466s (+42.0% 🔺)6.037s (+31.9% 🔺)1.571s51.39x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.815s (+11.7% 🔺)3.887s (-6.0% 🟢)2.073s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.971s (+20.9% 🔺)3.583s (-10.7% 🟢)1.612s91.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.544s (+10.2% 🔺)4.268s (+6.3% 🔺)0.724s81.95x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.335s (-6.3% 🟢)5.011s (~)0.676s62.39x
💻 LocalNitro4.920s (+9.3% 🔺)5.349s (+3.2%)0.428s62.71x
💻 LocalExpress5.499s (-2.7%)6.214s (+3.3%)0.716s53.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.535s (+13.5% 🔺)5.797s (+26.3% 🔺)2.261s61.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.951s (-33.5% 🟢)5.513s (-25.4% 🟢)1.562s61.12x
▲ VercelNitro4.368s (+9.6% 🔺)6.104s (+2.8%)1.736s61.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.199s (-1.5%)2.008s (~)0.809s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.289s (+5.3% 🔺)2.009s (~)0.720s151.08x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.307s (+1.2%)2.007s (~)0.700s151.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.349s (-0.9%)2.006s (~)0.657s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.458s (-5.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.550s151.22x
💻 LocalExpress1.587s (+2.6%)2.007s (~)0.419s151.32x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.356s (-28.1% 🟢)4.014s (-19.9% 🟢)1.658s81.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.775s (-28.5% 🟢)4.260s (-17.6% 🟢)1.485s81.18x
▲ VercelExpress3.065s (+10.2% 🔺)4.878s (+18.3% 🔺)1.813s71.30x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.437s (+6.6% 🔺)2.230s (+3.6%)0.793s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s (~)2.141s (~)0.608s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.582s (+10.8% 🔺)2.675s (+20.3% 🔺)1.093s121.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.943s (-5.4% 🟢)2.292s (-18.9% 🟢)0.349s141.35x
💻 LocalNitro2.132s (+17.7% 🔺)2.591s (+16.5% 🔺)0.459s121.48x
💻 LocalExpress2.387s (+10.8% 🔺)2.918s (+12.5% 🔺)0.530s111.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.924s (-26.1% 🟢)4.803s (-14.4% 🟢)1.879s71.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.955s (-50.8% 🟢)4.728s (-37.3% 🟢)1.773s71.01x
▲ VercelExpress3.141s (-58.4% 🟢)5.306s (-40.3% 🟢)2.166s61.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.595s (-4.5%)3.766s (-12.5% 🟢)2.172s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.690s (-18.0% 🟢)3.761s (-9.2% 🟢)2.072s81.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.109s (+24.6% 🔺)5.013s (+24.9% 🔺)0.904s62.58x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.723s (-6.2% 🟢)5.343s (-3.1%)0.620s62.96x
💻 LocalNitro5.876s (+8.2% 🔺)6.418s (+9.7% 🔺)0.542s53.68x
💻 LocalExpress6.316s (+3.6%)6.819s (+3.1%)0.503s53.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.333s (-48.9% 🟢)5.237s (-36.0% 🟢)1.903s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.018s (-61.0% 🟢)5.716s (-51.8% 🟢)1.697s61.21x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.668s (+42.9% 🔺)6.481s (+33.7% 🔺)1.814s51.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.588s (~)1.005s (~)0.417s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.614s (+6.1% 🔺)1.059s (+5.2% 🔺)0.445s571.04x
💻 LocalExpress0.652s (+6.9% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.353s601.11x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.703s (-19.4% 🟢)1.022s (-1.7%)0.318s591.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.732s (+29.2% 🔺)1.129s (+12.2% 🔺)0.397s541.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.856s (+6.3% 🔺)1.040s (+3.4%)0.184s581.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.697s (-8.5% 🟢)6.481s (-7.1% 🟢)1.784s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.010s (-5.1% 🟢)6.696s (-0.8%)1.686s91.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.418s (+6.4% 🔺)7.228s (+5.5% 🔺)1.810s91.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.339s (-4.5%)2.030s (+1.1%)0.690s451.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.513s (+0.7%)2.006s (~)0.493s451.13x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.604s (+10.8% 🔺)2.132s (+3.9%)0.528s431.20x
💻 LocalExpress1.616s (+6.1% 🔺)2.007s (~)0.391s451.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.676s (-21.3% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.331s451.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.968s (+3.0%)2.251s (+8.5% 🔺)0.283s411.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro12.141s (-13.4% 🟢)13.695s (-16.0% 🟢)1.554s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress12.341s (~)14.549s (+2.4%)2.209s71.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.105s (-20.0% 🟢)15.264s (-15.8% 🟢)2.159s61.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.703s (-1.2%)3.111s (+2.6%)0.408s391.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.806s (+1.7%)3.404s (+8.5% 🔺)0.598s361.04x
💻 LocalNitro3.335s (+3.5%)3.976s (-0.8%)0.641s311.23x
💻 LocalExpress3.419s (+3.0%)4.042s (+0.8%)0.624s301.26x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.625s (-16.6% 🟢)4.042s (-19.3% 🟢)0.417s301.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.859s (-0.6%)4.076s (-2.5%)0.217s301.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro23.984s (-22.3% 🟢)25.857s (-21.4% 🟢)1.873s51.00x
▲ VercelExpress24.791s (-9.0% 🟢)27.182s (-5.7% 🟢)2.391s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)26.311s (-12.0% 🟢)28.173s (-11.5% 🟢)1.862s51.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.240s (-4.6%)1.006s (~)0.767s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.297s (-3.5%)1.006s (-1.7%)0.709s601.24x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.363s (+45.0% 🔺)1.022s (+1.6%)0.659s591.51x
💻 LocalNitro0.435s (+9.3% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.569s601.82x
💻 LocalExpress0.444s (+13.4% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.561s601.85x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.551s (-4.6%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.470s592.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.000s (+6.1% 🔺)3.453s (-16.4% 🟢)1.453s181.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.020s (-11.6% 🟢)3.965s (+1.1%)1.945s161.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.085s (-15.6% 🟢)3.906s (-4.1%)1.821s161.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.391s (-7.3% 🟢)1.028s (-3.4%)0.638s881.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.470s (+12.5% 🔺)1.053s (+1.2%)0.583s861.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.562s (+1.7%)1.066s (+1.2%)0.504s851.44x
💻 LocalExpress2.144s (-0.9%)2.737s (+0.8%)0.593s335.49x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.284s (-6.5% 🟢)2.977s (-6.5% 🟢)0.693s315.85x
💻 LocalNitro2.295s (+8.3% 🔺)2.912s (+9.6% 🔺)0.617s315.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.518s (-9.1% 🟢)4.300s (+0.7%)1.782s211.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.698s (~)4.162s (-6.3% 🟢)1.464s221.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.065s (+6.4% 🔺)4.810s (+8.8% 🔺)1.745s191.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.763s (-9.1% 🟢)1.270s (-16.5% 🟢)0.507s951.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.830s (+2.2%)1.366s (-13.9% 🟢)0.536s881.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.700s (+4.0%)3.575s (+3.9%)0.875s343.54x
💻 LocalNitro9.704s (+3.8%)10.111s (+1.6%)0.408s1212.72x
💻 LocalExpress9.919s (+1.2%)10.446s (+0.8%)0.526s1213.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s (+5.0% 🔺)11.577s (+5.0%)0.921s1113.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express6.128s (-22.0% 🟢)7.798s (-15.6% 🟢)1.670s161.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.371s (~)7.949s (-5.1% 🟢)1.578s161.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.568s (-14.7% 🟢)8.365s (-10.3% 🟢)1.797s151.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.162s (-0.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (-7.7% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.850s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.163s (~)2.005s (~)0.011s (+6.1% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.854s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.168s (-3.3%)2.003s (~)0.010s (-2.9%)2.017s (~)0.849s101.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.171s (~)2.005s (~)0.013s (+2.4%)2.020s (~)0.849s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.228s (-3.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (+10.0% 🔺)2.010s (~)0.783s101.06x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.273s (+9.0% 🔺)1.991s (~)0.011s (+660.0% 🔺)2.052s (+2.1%)0.779s101.10x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.486s (+18.8% 🔺)3.711s (+23.9% 🔺)0.847s (-26.9% 🟢)4.965s (+9.1% 🔺)2.479s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.562s (-21.7% 🟢)3.764s (-18.4% 🟢)0.852s (+25.7% 🔺)5.158s (-11.2% 🟢)2.596s101.03x
▲ VercelExpress2.716s (+2.8%)4.004s (+9.2% 🔺)0.568s (-37.9% 🟢)5.270s (+5.9% 🔺)2.554s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.576s (-1.7%)2.007s (~)0.005s (~)2.026s (~)0.450s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (~)2.011s (~)0.012s (-16.4% 🟢)2.024s (~)0.447s301.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.589s (-0.5%)2.010s (~)0.013s (+6.4% 🔺)2.025s (~)0.436s301.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.628s (-6.6% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.014s (+10.9% 🔺)2.026s (~)0.399s301.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.761s (~)2.010s (~)0.005s (-1.3%)2.025s (~)0.264s301.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.006s (+26.0% 🔺)2.395s (+19.5% 🔺)0.004s (-18.1% 🟢)2.446s (+20.7% 🔺)0.439s251.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)6.178s (-4.6%)7.431s (-3.3%)0.206s (+26.3% 🔺)8.158s (-1.7%)1.980s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.448s (+4.7%)8.058s (+2.0%)0.155s (-18.2% 🟢)8.655s (+0.7%)2.208s71.04x
▲ VercelExpress6.540s8.098s0.219s8.772s2.232s71.06x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.700s (-11.7% 🟢)1.029s (-1.8%)0.000s (-1.7%)1.042s (-2.4%)0.341s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.060s (+5.0%)1.581s (+8.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)1.588s (+8.7% 🔺)0.528s381.51x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.212s (+58.9% 🔺)1.681s (+63.3% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)1.724s (+64.0% 🔺)0.512s351.73x
💻 LocalNitro1.394s (-1.7%)2.013s (~)0.000s (+20.0% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.621s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.416s (+2.6%)2.014s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.600s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.419s (-5.7% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.000s (-7.7% 🟢)2.016s (~)0.597s302.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.686s (-40.0% 🟢)3.822s (-34.2% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)4.294s (-31.0% 🟢)1.608s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.898s (+2.1%)4.249s (+3.1%)0.000s (NaN%)4.799s (+4.8%)1.901s131.08x
▲ VercelNitro2.914s (-12.9% 🟢)4.173s (-10.8% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)4.591s (-11.3% 🟢)1.676s141.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.766s (+8.3% 🔺)2.306s (+7.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.337s (+7.0% 🔺)0.571s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.248s (+13.5% 🔺)2.776s (+15.6% 🔺)0.000s (+13.6% 🔺)2.782s (+15.5% 🔺)0.535s221.27x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.546s (+57.5% 🔺)3.161s (+47.8% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)3.204s (+48.9% 🔺)0.658s191.44x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.908s (-3.3%)3.553s (+0.8%)0.000s (-32.6% 🟢)3.556s (+0.8%)0.648s171.65x
💻 LocalNitro3.042s (-1.2%)3.775s (~)0.001s (+44.4% 🔺)3.780s (~)0.738s161.72x
💻 LocalExpress3.128s (-2.4%)3.901s (-3.2%)0.000s (-40.3% 🟢)3.904s (-3.2%)0.776s161.77x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.346s (-2.7%)5.557s (-9.6% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.013s (-10.1% 🟢)1.667s101.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.351s (-20.0% 🟢)5.807s (-15.3% 🟢)0.004s (+1520.0% 🔺)6.281s (-13.9% 🟢)1.929s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.033s (-12.0% 🟢)6.381s (-6.8% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.856s (-5.6% 🟢)1.824s91.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalNitro12/21
🐘 PostgresNitro18/21
▲ VercelNitro9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres13/21
Next.js (Turbopack)💻 Local11/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production138702191606
✅ 💻 Local Development182502192044
✅ 📦 Local Production182502192044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres181102332044
✅ 🪟 Windows14600146
✅ 📋 Other84401781022
Total7838010688906

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro120026
✅ example120026
✅ express120026
✅ fastify120026
✅ hono120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack14402
✅ nextjs-webpack14402
✅ nitro120026
✅ nuxt120026
✅ sveltekit13907
✅ vite120026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable120026
✅ express-stable120026
✅ fastify-stable120026
✅ hono-stable120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nitro-stable120026
✅ nuxt-stable120026
✅ sveltekit-stable13907
✅ vite-stable120026
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack14600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable120026
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-120026
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start120026

📋 View full workflow run

@socket-security

socket-securityBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

DiffPackageSupply Chain
Security
VulnerabilityQualityMaintenanceLicense
Addednpm/​esbuild@​0.28.1911007391100

View full report

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the workspace’s esbuild dependency to ^0.28.1 to address GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr, propagating the bump via the pnpm catalog and updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump esbuild in the pnpm catalog from ^0.27.3 to ^0.28.1.
  • Re-resolve pnpm-lock.yaml to incorporate esbuild@0.28.1 and its platform binaries.
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
pnpm-workspace.yamlUpdates the pnpm catalog to use esbuild: ^0.28.1.
pnpm-lock.yamlUpdates lockfile resolutions to include esbuild@0.28.1 and related dependency graph changes.
.changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.mdAdds a patch changeset for publishable consumers impacted by the bump.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 36 to +38
esbuild:
specifier: ^0.27.3
version: 0.27.7
specifier: ^0.28.1
version: 0.28.1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that 0.27.7 lingers transitively. I tried both remediation paths:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet. vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) still pins ^0.27.3, both of which exclude 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as a breaking bump). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this — too risky for the example workbenches.
  2. Force a pnpm override (esbuild: ^0.28.1) — this does unify everything on 0.28.1, but it breaks @workflow/web's production build: react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment ... is not supported yet on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine. So the override regresses a published, deployed package, and I reverted it.

Given the advisory's exploitable path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts; the Node install path already verifies integrity) and the remaining copies are build-time-only dev tooling (vite/astro/fumadocs), the residual risk is negligible. The flagged direct dependency in packages/builders — the subject of the advisory — is on 0.28.1. I've left the transitive copies rather than ship a broken build; they'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +11899 to +11905
hasBin: true

esbuild@0.28.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-HrJrvZv5ayxBzPfwphOoNzkzOIIlifzk0KJrGK2c8R4+LKpMtpYLQeUdjnwjWv/LZlkH2laZk+4w78pi99D4Vw==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on the churn — fixed in 991f628. Re-resolving the lockfile now drops esbuild@0.28.0 entirely: nitropack@2.13.4 (which declares esbuild: ^0.28.0) consolidates onto 0.28.1, so only 0.28.1 plus the upstream-pinned 0.27.7 remain.

Minor correction: 0.28.0 wasn't actually orphaned in the prior revision — it was still referenced by nitropack@2.13.4 — but that's moot now that it's gone.

The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 011d482 into mainJun 13, 2026
121 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/esbuild-0.28.1 branch June 13, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed for 011d482 due to a workflow error (backport job run).

This is usually an infrastructure problem (e.g. the configured AI model could not be found, an AI Gateway error, or an opencode crash) rather than a merge conflict. Check the job logs linked above for details.

Once the underlying issue is fixed, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

011d482808793e8deb0e8523a9c16af129490ee6

github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
* fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)
Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(ci): exclude esbuild from minimumReleaseAge gate
The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranay Prakash <pranay.gp@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2404. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

VaguelySerious pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2026
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
…-stable
* origin/stable:
[test] Fix stable e2e hookGetConflict test to use waitForHookState (#2405)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399) (#2401)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395) (#2404)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
* origin/main:
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
* origin/main:
Small detail panel cleanup (#2459)
Fix lazy Next workflow HMR (#2438)
Prevent peer dependency-only major bumps (#2437)
fix(changesets): only major-bump peer dependents when out of range (#2439)
Version Packages (beta) (#2428)
otel: explicit traceparent injection + linked-trace mode for bounded per-invocation traces (#2363)
[next] Clarify `serverExternalPackages` warning (#2417)
Add .swc gitignore handling to builder (#2427)
Version Packages (beta) (#2390)
[ci] Increase dev.test.ts cleanup hook timeout (#2416)
[world-vercel] Switch event endpoints to v4 wire format (#2055)
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
test: e2e coverage for run-idempotency conflict-handling strategies (#2387)
# Conflicts:
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranaygp@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) by pranaygp · Pull Request #2395 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) - #2395

Merged
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#2395
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygppranaygp commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Must be backported to stable (4.x) post-merge

This PR must be backported to the stable branch after merge. The stable (4.x) branch carries the identical esbuild: ^0.27.3 catalog entry and the same packages/builders consumer, so it is affected by the same advisory. The included changeset uses a patch bump precisely so the backport publishes a 4.x patch release. If the automated backport action declines or conflicts, force it via workflow_dispatch on .github/workflows/backport.yml.

Resolves Linear VULN-11749.

What this fixes

Socket / GitHub advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr"Missing binary integrity verification … enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY" (High, CVSS 8.1). Affected range >= 0.17.0 < 0.28.1; fixed in 0.28.1.

This bumps the pnpm catalog entry for esbuild from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1. Every workspace package that depends on esbuild references it via catalog:@workflow/builders, @workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root dev dependency — so the single catalog change propagates to all of them, and the flagged direct dependency in packages/builders now resolves to 0.28.1.

Honest risk assessment

The advisory is real and correctly flagged, but the exploitable code path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts downloaded the native binary without SHA-256 verification when NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY is set). The Node.js install path already verified integrity, and this repo is a Node.js/pnpm project that never uses esbuild's Deno distribution — so practical exploitability here is low. Regardless, 0.27.7 is in the affected npm range, it's a direct dependency of packages/builders, and the remediation is free, so upgrading is correct and clears the alert. (esbuild 0.28.0/0.28.1 exist specifically to add these integrity checks.)

Transitive esbuild copies (why some 0.27.7 remains)

0.27.7 still appears transitively under build-time-only dev tooling in the example workbenches (vite, astro, fumadocs). I tried both ways to remove it:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet: vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) pins ^0.27.3, both excluding 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as breaking). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this.
  2. Force a pnpm override — unifies everything on 0.28.1, but breaks @workflow/web's build (react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with "Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment … is not supported yet" on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine). Reverted.

Since the vuln path is Deno-only and these are build-time dev tooling, the residual risk is negligible. They'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges. (Re-resolving did drop the redundant 0.28.0 — nitropack consolidated onto 0.28.1.)

CI: minimumReleaseAge fix

The canary E2E jobs run pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (they mutate the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hit the workspace's 48h minimumReleaseAge gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1 (ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION). Fixed by adding esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude — pnpm's recommended remedy, consistent with the existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions. --frozen-lockfile jobs (Build Packages, stable E2E) were unaffected and already passed.

Changes

  • pnpm-workspace.yaml: esbuild catalog ^0.27.3^0.28.1; add esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: re-resolved esbuild graph to 0.28.1 (diff scoped entirely to esbuild + @esbuild/*)
  • .changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.md: patch bump for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli

Verification

  • @workflow/builders builds and all 170 tests pass against 0.28.1 (exercises the esbuild.build() API directly).
  • @workflow/web builds cleanly (confirming the override revert).
  • pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (the canary install mode) now completes with no age-gate error and a stable lockfile.
  • esbuild changelog confirms no JS API signature changes in 0.28.x — only install-time integrity checks plus minor codegen fixes.

Note: the only currently-failing check, E2E Vercel Prod Tests (fastify), is an unrelated flaky abort test (AbortController > abortFromStepWorkflow, 119 passed / 1 failed) — a distributed-abort timing test against a live preview, not affected by an esbuild version bump.

Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2026 06:06
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 13, 2026 06:06
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 991f628

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.040s (-10.1% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.965s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.044s (~)1.007s (~)0.962s101.10x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.053s (-16.4% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.960s101.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.054s (-13.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.952s101.35x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.065s (-2.3%)1.012s (~)0.947s101.61x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.068s (+1.6%)1.012s (~)0.944s101.69x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.269s (-55.9% 🟢)2.408s (-2.5%)2.139s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro0.409s (+14.3% 🔺)2.538s (-2.1%)2.129s101.52x
▲ VercelExpress0.450s (+48.3% 🔺)2.745s (+24.2% 🔺)2.295s101.67x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.091s (~)2.006s (~)0.915s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.101s (~)2.007s (~)0.906s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.106s (~)2.011s (~)0.905s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.106s (~)2.013s (~)0.907s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.113s (-2.6%)2.006s (~)0.893s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.148s (+0.6%)2.010s (~)0.862s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.681s (-21.9% 🟢)3.444s (-14.2% 🟢)1.763s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress1.755s (+1.1%)4.086s (+23.8% 🔺)2.331s101.04x
▲ VercelNitro1.836s (+4.1%)3.705s (-4.0%)1.868s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.508s (~)11.022s (~)0.514s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.555s (~)11.017s (~)0.462s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.560s (~)11.023s (~)0.462s31.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.656s (-1.1%)11.023s (~)0.367s31.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.749s (+1.9%)11.020s (~)0.272s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.869s (~)11.018s (~)0.150s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro15.115s (+8.2% 🔺)17.194s (+9.2% 🔺)2.079s21.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)15.331s (+5.8% 🔺)16.760s (+3.3%)1.429s21.01x
▲ VercelExpress15.575s (+7.8% 🔺)17.240s (+12.0% 🔺)1.664s21.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro13.692s (~)14.027s (~)0.335s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.801s (~)14.028s (~)0.227s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.962s (~)14.221s (+1.4%)0.258s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.107s (-1.7%)15.030s (~)0.923s41.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.120s (+2.2%)14.626s (+4.3%)0.506s51.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.580s (+1.2%)15.024s (~)0.444s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express25.201s (+23.3% 🔺)27.562s (+25.7% 🔺)2.361s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro26.340s (+8.1% 🔺)27.894s (+6.3% 🔺)1.555s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)27.027s (+24.1% 🔺)28.718s (+18.1% 🔺)1.692s31.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro12.423s (-1.6%)13.017s (~)0.594s71.00x
💻 LocalExpress12.571s (~)13.026s (~)0.455s71.01x
💻 LocalNitro12.685s (+2.5%)13.170s (+1.1%)0.485s71.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.985s (-6.1% 🟢)13.310s (-6.1% 🟢)0.326s71.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.748s (+9.3% 🔺)14.162s (+8.8% 🔺)0.414s71.11x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.760s (-2.2%)14.018s (-3.9%)0.258s71.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro35.523s (+20.3% 🔺)38.316s (+18.5% 🔺)2.793s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress37.263s (+11.1% 🔺)39.690s (+13.4% 🔺)2.427s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)39.355s (+22.5% 🔺)41.407s (+24.6% 🔺)2.052s31.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.193s (-2.4%)2.007s (~)0.814s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.205s (-0.5%)2.008s (~)0.803s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.207s (-5.4% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.799s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.230s (+3.8%)2.006s (~)0.776s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s (-7.8% 🟢)2.005s (~)0.747s151.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.267s (-3.1%)2.008s (~)0.741s151.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.329s (+4.2%)3.867s (+6.1% 🔺)1.538s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.425s (-41.9% 🟢)4.077s (-27.4% 🟢)1.652s81.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.689s (-5.3% 🟢)4.438s (+3.5%)1.749s71.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.394s (-2.0%)2.269s (+5.5% 🔺)0.875s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.431s (+1.2%)2.318s (-3.1%)0.887s131.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.540s (-2.6%)2.223s (-4.1%)0.683s141.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.716s (-2.5%)2.006s (-6.8% 🟢)0.290s151.23x
💻 LocalNitro1.761s (~)2.006s (-3.2%)0.245s151.26x
💻 LocalExpress1.991s (-3.5%)2.394s (-4.6%)0.403s131.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.210s (-44.7% 🟢)5.076s (-29.4% 🟢)1.866s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro3.399s (+21.7% 🔺)4.984s (+15.1% 🔺)1.585s71.06x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.466s (+42.0% 🔺)6.037s (+31.9% 🔺)1.571s51.39x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.815s (+11.7% 🔺)3.887s (-6.0% 🟢)2.073s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.971s (+20.9% 🔺)3.583s (-10.7% 🟢)1.612s91.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.544s (+10.2% 🔺)4.268s (+6.3% 🔺)0.724s81.95x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.335s (-6.3% 🟢)5.011s (~)0.676s62.39x
💻 LocalNitro4.920s (+9.3% 🔺)5.349s (+3.2%)0.428s62.71x
💻 LocalExpress5.499s (-2.7%)6.214s (+3.3%)0.716s53.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.535s (+13.5% 🔺)5.797s (+26.3% 🔺)2.261s61.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.951s (-33.5% 🟢)5.513s (-25.4% 🟢)1.562s61.12x
▲ VercelNitro4.368s (+9.6% 🔺)6.104s (+2.8%)1.736s61.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.199s (-1.5%)2.008s (~)0.809s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.289s (+5.3% 🔺)2.009s (~)0.720s151.08x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.307s (+1.2%)2.007s (~)0.700s151.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.349s (-0.9%)2.006s (~)0.657s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.458s (-5.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.550s151.22x
💻 LocalExpress1.587s (+2.6%)2.007s (~)0.419s151.32x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.356s (-28.1% 🟢)4.014s (-19.9% 🟢)1.658s81.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.775s (-28.5% 🟢)4.260s (-17.6% 🟢)1.485s81.18x
▲ VercelExpress3.065s (+10.2% 🔺)4.878s (+18.3% 🔺)1.813s71.30x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.437s (+6.6% 🔺)2.230s (+3.6%)0.793s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s (~)2.141s (~)0.608s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.582s (+10.8% 🔺)2.675s (+20.3% 🔺)1.093s121.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.943s (-5.4% 🟢)2.292s (-18.9% 🟢)0.349s141.35x
💻 LocalNitro2.132s (+17.7% 🔺)2.591s (+16.5% 🔺)0.459s121.48x
💻 LocalExpress2.387s (+10.8% 🔺)2.918s (+12.5% 🔺)0.530s111.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.924s (-26.1% 🟢)4.803s (-14.4% 🟢)1.879s71.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.955s (-50.8% 🟢)4.728s (-37.3% 🟢)1.773s71.01x
▲ VercelExpress3.141s (-58.4% 🟢)5.306s (-40.3% 🟢)2.166s61.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.595s (-4.5%)3.766s (-12.5% 🟢)2.172s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.690s (-18.0% 🟢)3.761s (-9.2% 🟢)2.072s81.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.109s (+24.6% 🔺)5.013s (+24.9% 🔺)0.904s62.58x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.723s (-6.2% 🟢)5.343s (-3.1%)0.620s62.96x
💻 LocalNitro5.876s (+8.2% 🔺)6.418s (+9.7% 🔺)0.542s53.68x
💻 LocalExpress6.316s (+3.6%)6.819s (+3.1%)0.503s53.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.333s (-48.9% 🟢)5.237s (-36.0% 🟢)1.903s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.018s (-61.0% 🟢)5.716s (-51.8% 🟢)1.697s61.21x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.668s (+42.9% 🔺)6.481s (+33.7% 🔺)1.814s51.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.588s (~)1.005s (~)0.417s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.614s (+6.1% 🔺)1.059s (+5.2% 🔺)0.445s571.04x
💻 LocalExpress0.652s (+6.9% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.353s601.11x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.703s (-19.4% 🟢)1.022s (-1.7%)0.318s591.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.732s (+29.2% 🔺)1.129s (+12.2% 🔺)0.397s541.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.856s (+6.3% 🔺)1.040s (+3.4%)0.184s581.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.697s (-8.5% 🟢)6.481s (-7.1% 🟢)1.784s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.010s (-5.1% 🟢)6.696s (-0.8%)1.686s91.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.418s (+6.4% 🔺)7.228s (+5.5% 🔺)1.810s91.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.339s (-4.5%)2.030s (+1.1%)0.690s451.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.513s (+0.7%)2.006s (~)0.493s451.13x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.604s (+10.8% 🔺)2.132s (+3.9%)0.528s431.20x
💻 LocalExpress1.616s (+6.1% 🔺)2.007s (~)0.391s451.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.676s (-21.3% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.331s451.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.968s (+3.0%)2.251s (+8.5% 🔺)0.283s411.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro12.141s (-13.4% 🟢)13.695s (-16.0% 🟢)1.554s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress12.341s (~)14.549s (+2.4%)2.209s71.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.105s (-20.0% 🟢)15.264s (-15.8% 🟢)2.159s61.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.703s (-1.2%)3.111s (+2.6%)0.408s391.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.806s (+1.7%)3.404s (+8.5% 🔺)0.598s361.04x
💻 LocalNitro3.335s (+3.5%)3.976s (-0.8%)0.641s311.23x
💻 LocalExpress3.419s (+3.0%)4.042s (+0.8%)0.624s301.26x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.625s (-16.6% 🟢)4.042s (-19.3% 🟢)0.417s301.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.859s (-0.6%)4.076s (-2.5%)0.217s301.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro23.984s (-22.3% 🟢)25.857s (-21.4% 🟢)1.873s51.00x
▲ VercelExpress24.791s (-9.0% 🟢)27.182s (-5.7% 🟢)2.391s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)26.311s (-12.0% 🟢)28.173s (-11.5% 🟢)1.862s51.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.240s (-4.6%)1.006s (~)0.767s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.297s (-3.5%)1.006s (-1.7%)0.709s601.24x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.363s (+45.0% 🔺)1.022s (+1.6%)0.659s591.51x
💻 LocalNitro0.435s (+9.3% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.569s601.82x
💻 LocalExpress0.444s (+13.4% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.561s601.85x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.551s (-4.6%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.470s592.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.000s (+6.1% 🔺)3.453s (-16.4% 🟢)1.453s181.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.020s (-11.6% 🟢)3.965s (+1.1%)1.945s161.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.085s (-15.6% 🟢)3.906s (-4.1%)1.821s161.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.391s (-7.3% 🟢)1.028s (-3.4%)0.638s881.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.470s (+12.5% 🔺)1.053s (+1.2%)0.583s861.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.562s (+1.7%)1.066s (+1.2%)0.504s851.44x
💻 LocalExpress2.144s (-0.9%)2.737s (+0.8%)0.593s335.49x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.284s (-6.5% 🟢)2.977s (-6.5% 🟢)0.693s315.85x
💻 LocalNitro2.295s (+8.3% 🔺)2.912s (+9.6% 🔺)0.617s315.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.518s (-9.1% 🟢)4.300s (+0.7%)1.782s211.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.698s (~)4.162s (-6.3% 🟢)1.464s221.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.065s (+6.4% 🔺)4.810s (+8.8% 🔺)1.745s191.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.763s (-9.1% 🟢)1.270s (-16.5% 🟢)0.507s951.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.830s (+2.2%)1.366s (-13.9% 🟢)0.536s881.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.700s (+4.0%)3.575s (+3.9%)0.875s343.54x
💻 LocalNitro9.704s (+3.8%)10.111s (+1.6%)0.408s1212.72x
💻 LocalExpress9.919s (+1.2%)10.446s (+0.8%)0.526s1213.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s (+5.0% 🔺)11.577s (+5.0%)0.921s1113.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express6.128s (-22.0% 🟢)7.798s (-15.6% 🟢)1.670s161.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.371s (~)7.949s (-5.1% 🟢)1.578s161.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.568s (-14.7% 🟢)8.365s (-10.3% 🟢)1.797s151.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.162s (-0.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (-7.7% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.850s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.163s (~)2.005s (~)0.011s (+6.1% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.854s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.168s (-3.3%)2.003s (~)0.010s (-2.9%)2.017s (~)0.849s101.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.171s (~)2.005s (~)0.013s (+2.4%)2.020s (~)0.849s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.228s (-3.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (+10.0% 🔺)2.010s (~)0.783s101.06x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.273s (+9.0% 🔺)1.991s (~)0.011s (+660.0% 🔺)2.052s (+2.1%)0.779s101.10x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.486s (+18.8% 🔺)3.711s (+23.9% 🔺)0.847s (-26.9% 🟢)4.965s (+9.1% 🔺)2.479s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.562s (-21.7% 🟢)3.764s (-18.4% 🟢)0.852s (+25.7% 🔺)5.158s (-11.2% 🟢)2.596s101.03x
▲ VercelExpress2.716s (+2.8%)4.004s (+9.2% 🔺)0.568s (-37.9% 🟢)5.270s (+5.9% 🔺)2.554s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.576s (-1.7%)2.007s (~)0.005s (~)2.026s (~)0.450s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (~)2.011s (~)0.012s (-16.4% 🟢)2.024s (~)0.447s301.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.589s (-0.5%)2.010s (~)0.013s (+6.4% 🔺)2.025s (~)0.436s301.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.628s (-6.6% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.014s (+10.9% 🔺)2.026s (~)0.399s301.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.761s (~)2.010s (~)0.005s (-1.3%)2.025s (~)0.264s301.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.006s (+26.0% 🔺)2.395s (+19.5% 🔺)0.004s (-18.1% 🟢)2.446s (+20.7% 🔺)0.439s251.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)6.178s (-4.6%)7.431s (-3.3%)0.206s (+26.3% 🔺)8.158s (-1.7%)1.980s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.448s (+4.7%)8.058s (+2.0%)0.155s (-18.2% 🟢)8.655s (+0.7%)2.208s71.04x
▲ VercelExpress6.540s8.098s0.219s8.772s2.232s71.06x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.700s (-11.7% 🟢)1.029s (-1.8%)0.000s (-1.7%)1.042s (-2.4%)0.341s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.060s (+5.0%)1.581s (+8.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)1.588s (+8.7% 🔺)0.528s381.51x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.212s (+58.9% 🔺)1.681s (+63.3% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)1.724s (+64.0% 🔺)0.512s351.73x
💻 LocalNitro1.394s (-1.7%)2.013s (~)0.000s (+20.0% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.621s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.416s (+2.6%)2.014s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.600s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.419s (-5.7% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.000s (-7.7% 🟢)2.016s (~)0.597s302.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.686s (-40.0% 🟢)3.822s (-34.2% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)4.294s (-31.0% 🟢)1.608s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.898s (+2.1%)4.249s (+3.1%)0.000s (NaN%)4.799s (+4.8%)1.901s131.08x
▲ VercelNitro2.914s (-12.9% 🟢)4.173s (-10.8% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)4.591s (-11.3% 🟢)1.676s141.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.766s (+8.3% 🔺)2.306s (+7.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.337s (+7.0% 🔺)0.571s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.248s (+13.5% 🔺)2.776s (+15.6% 🔺)0.000s (+13.6% 🔺)2.782s (+15.5% 🔺)0.535s221.27x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.546s (+57.5% 🔺)3.161s (+47.8% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)3.204s (+48.9% 🔺)0.658s191.44x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.908s (-3.3%)3.553s (+0.8%)0.000s (-32.6% 🟢)3.556s (+0.8%)0.648s171.65x
💻 LocalNitro3.042s (-1.2%)3.775s (~)0.001s (+44.4% 🔺)3.780s (~)0.738s161.72x
💻 LocalExpress3.128s (-2.4%)3.901s (-3.2%)0.000s (-40.3% 🟢)3.904s (-3.2%)0.776s161.77x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.346s (-2.7%)5.557s (-9.6% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.013s (-10.1% 🟢)1.667s101.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.351s (-20.0% 🟢)5.807s (-15.3% 🟢)0.004s (+1520.0% 🔺)6.281s (-13.9% 🟢)1.929s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.033s (-12.0% 🟢)6.381s (-6.8% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.856s (-5.6% 🟢)1.824s91.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalNitro12/21
🐘 PostgresNitro18/21
▲ VercelNitro9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres13/21
Next.js (Turbopack)💻 Local11/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production138702191606
✅ 💻 Local Development182502192044
✅ 📦 Local Production182502192044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres181102332044
✅ 🪟 Windows14600146
✅ 📋 Other84401781022
Total7838010688906

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro120026
✅ example120026
✅ express120026
✅ fastify120026
✅ hono120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack14402
✅ nextjs-webpack14402
✅ nitro120026
✅ nuxt120026
✅ sveltekit13907
✅ vite120026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable120026
✅ express-stable120026
✅ fastify-stable120026
✅ hono-stable120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nitro-stable120026
✅ nuxt-stable120026
✅ sveltekit-stable13907
✅ vite-stable120026
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack14600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable120026
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-120026
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start120026

📋 View full workflow run

@socket-security

socket-securityBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

DiffPackageSupply Chain
Security
VulnerabilityQualityMaintenanceLicense
Addednpm/​esbuild@​0.28.1911007391100

View full report

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the workspace’s esbuild dependency to ^0.28.1 to address GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr, propagating the bump via the pnpm catalog and updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump esbuild in the pnpm catalog from ^0.27.3 to ^0.28.1.
  • Re-resolve pnpm-lock.yaml to incorporate esbuild@0.28.1 and its platform binaries.
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
pnpm-workspace.yamlUpdates the pnpm catalog to use esbuild: ^0.28.1.
pnpm-lock.yamlUpdates lockfile resolutions to include esbuild@0.28.1 and related dependency graph changes.
.changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.mdAdds a patch changeset for publishable consumers impacted by the bump.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 36 to +38
esbuild:
specifier: ^0.27.3
version: 0.27.7
specifier: ^0.28.1
version: 0.28.1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that 0.27.7 lingers transitively. I tried both remediation paths:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet. vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) still pins ^0.27.3, both of which exclude 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as a breaking bump). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this — too risky for the example workbenches.
  2. Force a pnpm override (esbuild: ^0.28.1) — this does unify everything on 0.28.1, but it breaks @workflow/web's production build: react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment ... is not supported yet on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine. So the override regresses a published, deployed package, and I reverted it.

Given the advisory's exploitable path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts; the Node install path already verifies integrity) and the remaining copies are build-time-only dev tooling (vite/astro/fumadocs), the residual risk is negligible. The flagged direct dependency in packages/builders — the subject of the advisory — is on 0.28.1. I've left the transitive copies rather than ship a broken build; they'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +11899 to +11905
hasBin: true

esbuild@0.28.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-HrJrvZv5ayxBzPfwphOoNzkzOIIlifzk0KJrGK2c8R4+LKpMtpYLQeUdjnwjWv/LZlkH2laZk+4w78pi99D4Vw==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on the churn — fixed in 991f628. Re-resolving the lockfile now drops esbuild@0.28.0 entirely: nitropack@2.13.4 (which declares esbuild: ^0.28.0) consolidates onto 0.28.1, so only 0.28.1 plus the upstream-pinned 0.27.7 remain.

Minor correction: 0.28.0 wasn't actually orphaned in the prior revision — it was still referenced by nitropack@2.13.4 — but that's moot now that it's gone.

The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 011d482 into mainJun 13, 2026
121 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/esbuild-0.28.1 branch June 13, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed for 011d482 due to a workflow error (backport job run).

This is usually an infrastructure problem (e.g. the configured AI model could not be found, an AI Gateway error, or an opencode crash) rather than a merge conflict. Check the job logs linked above for details.

Once the underlying issue is fixed, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

011d482808793e8deb0e8523a9c16af129490ee6

github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
* fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)
Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(ci): exclude esbuild from minimumReleaseAge gate
The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranay Prakash <pranay.gp@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2404. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

VaguelySerious pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2026
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
…-stable
* origin/stable:
[test] Fix stable e2e hookGetConflict test to use waitForHookState (#2405)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399) (#2401)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395) (#2404)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
* origin/main:
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
* origin/main:
Small detail panel cleanup (#2459)
Fix lazy Next workflow HMR (#2438)
Prevent peer dependency-only major bumps (#2437)
fix(changesets): only major-bump peer dependents when out of range (#2439)
Version Packages (beta) (#2428)
otel: explicit traceparent injection + linked-trace mode for bounded per-invocation traces (#2363)
[next] Clarify `serverExternalPackages` warning (#2417)
Add .swc gitignore handling to builder (#2427)
Version Packages (beta) (#2390)
[ci] Increase dev.test.ts cleanup hook timeout (#2416)
[world-vercel] Switch event endpoints to v4 wire format (#2055)
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
test: e2e coverage for run-idempotency conflict-handling strategies (#2387)
# Conflicts:
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranaygp@TooTallNate
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) by pranaygp · Pull Request #2395 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) - #2395

Merged
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#2395
pranaygp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/esbuild-0.28.1

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygppranaygp commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Must be backported to stable (4.x) post-merge

This PR must be backported to the stable branch after merge. The stable (4.x) branch carries the identical esbuild: ^0.27.3 catalog entry and the same packages/builders consumer, so it is affected by the same advisory. The included changeset uses a patch bump precisely so the backport publishes a 4.x patch release. If the automated backport action declines or conflicts, force it via workflow_dispatch on .github/workflows/backport.yml.

Resolves Linear VULN-11749.

What this fixes

Socket / GitHub advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr"Missing binary integrity verification … enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY" (High, CVSS 8.1). Affected range >= 0.17.0 < 0.28.1; fixed in 0.28.1.

This bumps the pnpm catalog entry for esbuild from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1. Every workspace package that depends on esbuild references it via catalog:@workflow/builders, @workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root dev dependency — so the single catalog change propagates to all of them, and the flagged direct dependency in packages/builders now resolves to 0.28.1.

Honest risk assessment

The advisory is real and correctly flagged, but the exploitable code path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts downloaded the native binary without SHA-256 verification when NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY is set). The Node.js install path already verified integrity, and this repo is a Node.js/pnpm project that never uses esbuild's Deno distribution — so practical exploitability here is low. Regardless, 0.27.7 is in the affected npm range, it's a direct dependency of packages/builders, and the remediation is free, so upgrading is correct and clears the alert. (esbuild 0.28.0/0.28.1 exist specifically to add these integrity checks.)

Transitive esbuild copies (why some 0.27.7 remains)

0.27.7 still appears transitively under build-time-only dev tooling in the example workbenches (vite, astro, fumadocs). I tried both ways to remove it:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet: vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) pins ^0.27.3, both excluding 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as breaking). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this.
  2. Force a pnpm override — unifies everything on 0.28.1, but breaks @workflow/web's build (react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with "Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment … is not supported yet" on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine). Reverted.

Since the vuln path is Deno-only and these are build-time dev tooling, the residual risk is negligible. They'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges. (Re-resolving did drop the redundant 0.28.0 — nitropack consolidated onto 0.28.1.)

CI: minimumReleaseAge fix

The canary E2E jobs run pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (they mutate the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hit the workspace's 48h minimumReleaseAge gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1 (ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION). Fixed by adding esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude — pnpm's recommended remedy, consistent with the existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions. --frozen-lockfile jobs (Build Packages, stable E2E) were unaffected and already passed.

Changes

  • pnpm-workspace.yaml: esbuild catalog ^0.27.3^0.28.1; add esbuild + @esbuild/* to minimumReleaseAgeExclude
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: re-resolved esbuild graph to 0.28.1 (diff scoped entirely to esbuild + @esbuild/*)
  • .changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.md: patch bump for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli

Verification

  • @workflow/builders builds and all 170 tests pass against 0.28.1 (exercises the esbuild.build() API directly).
  • @workflow/web builds cleanly (confirming the override revert).
  • pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile (the canary install mode) now completes with no age-gate error and a stable lockfile.
  • esbuild changelog confirms no JS API signature changes in 0.28.x — only install-time integrity checks plus minor codegen fixes.

Note: the only currently-failing check, E2E Vercel Prod Tests (fastify), is an unrelated flaky abort test (AbortController > abortFromStepWorkflow, 119 passed / 1 failed) — a distributed-abort timing test against a live preview, not affected by an esbuild version bump.

Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 13, 2026 06:06
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 13, 2026 06:06
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 991f628

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.040s (-10.1% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.965s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress0.044s (~)1.007s (~)0.962s101.10x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.053s (-16.4% 🟢)1.013s (~)0.960s101.31x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.054s (-13.6% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.952s101.35x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.065s (-2.3%)1.012s (~)0.947s101.61x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.068s (+1.6%)1.012s (~)0.944s101.69x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)0.269s (-55.9% 🟢)2.408s (-2.5%)2.139s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro0.409s (+14.3% 🔺)2.538s (-2.1%)2.129s101.52x
▲ VercelExpress0.450s (+48.3% 🔺)2.745s (+24.2% 🔺)2.295s101.67x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.091s (~)2.006s (~)0.915s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.101s (~)2.007s (~)0.906s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.106s (~)2.011s (~)0.905s101.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.106s (~)2.013s (~)0.907s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.113s (-2.6%)2.006s (~)0.893s101.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.148s (+0.6%)2.010s (~)0.862s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)1.681s (-21.9% 🟢)3.444s (-14.2% 🟢)1.763s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress1.755s (+1.1%)4.086s (+23.8% 🔺)2.331s101.04x
▲ VercelNitro1.836s (+4.1%)3.705s (-4.0%)1.868s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.508s (~)11.022s (~)0.514s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.555s (~)11.017s (~)0.462s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.560s (~)11.023s (~)0.462s31.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.656s (-1.1%)11.023s (~)0.367s31.01x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.749s (+1.9%)11.020s (~)0.272s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.869s (~)11.018s (~)0.150s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro15.115s (+8.2% 🔺)17.194s (+9.2% 🔺)2.079s21.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)15.331s (+5.8% 🔺)16.760s (+3.3%)1.429s21.01x
▲ VercelExpress15.575s (+7.8% 🔺)17.240s (+12.0% 🔺)1.664s21.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro13.692s (~)14.027s (~)0.335s51.00x
💻 LocalExpress13.801s (~)14.028s (~)0.227s51.01x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.962s (~)14.221s (+1.4%)0.258s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.107s (-1.7%)15.030s (~)0.923s41.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress14.120s (+2.2%)14.626s (+4.3%)0.506s51.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.580s (+1.2%)15.024s (~)0.444s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express25.201s (+23.3% 🔺)27.562s (+25.7% 🔺)2.361s31.00x
▲ VercelNitro26.340s (+8.1% 🔺)27.894s (+6.3% 🔺)1.555s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)27.027s (+24.1% 🔺)28.718s (+18.1% 🔺)1.692s31.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro12.423s (-1.6%)13.017s (~)0.594s71.00x
💻 LocalExpress12.571s (~)13.026s (~)0.455s71.01x
💻 LocalNitro12.685s (+2.5%)13.170s (+1.1%)0.485s71.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.985s (-6.1% 🟢)13.310s (-6.1% 🟢)0.326s71.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.748s (+9.3% 🔺)14.162s (+8.8% 🔺)0.414s71.11x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.760s (-2.2%)14.018s (-3.9%)0.258s71.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro35.523s (+20.3% 🔺)38.316s (+18.5% 🔺)2.793s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress37.263s (+11.1% 🔺)39.690s (+13.4% 🔺)2.427s31.05x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)39.355s (+22.5% 🔺)41.407s (+24.6% 🔺)2.052s31.11x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.193s (-2.4%)2.007s (~)0.814s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.205s (-0.5%)2.008s (~)0.803s151.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.207s (-5.4% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.799s151.01x
💻 LocalNitro1.230s (+3.8%)2.006s (~)0.776s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.258s (-7.8% 🟢)2.005s (~)0.747s151.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.267s (-3.1%)2.008s (~)0.741s151.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.329s (+4.2%)3.867s (+6.1% 🔺)1.538s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.425s (-41.9% 🟢)4.077s (-27.4% 🟢)1.652s81.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.689s (-5.3% 🟢)4.438s (+3.5%)1.749s71.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.394s (-2.0%)2.269s (+5.5% 🔺)0.875s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.431s (+1.2%)2.318s (-3.1%)0.887s131.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.540s (-2.6%)2.223s (-4.1%)0.683s141.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.716s (-2.5%)2.006s (-6.8% 🟢)0.290s151.23x
💻 LocalNitro1.761s (~)2.006s (-3.2%)0.245s151.26x
💻 LocalExpress1.991s (-3.5%)2.394s (-4.6%)0.403s131.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.210s (-44.7% 🟢)5.076s (-29.4% 🟢)1.866s71.00x
▲ VercelNitro3.399s (+21.7% 🔺)4.984s (+15.1% 🔺)1.585s71.06x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.466s (+42.0% 🔺)6.037s (+31.9% 🔺)1.571s51.39x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.815s (+11.7% 🔺)3.887s (-6.0% 🟢)2.073s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.971s (+20.9% 🔺)3.583s (-10.7% 🟢)1.612s91.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.544s (+10.2% 🔺)4.268s (+6.3% 🔺)0.724s81.95x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.335s (-6.3% 🟢)5.011s (~)0.676s62.39x
💻 LocalNitro4.920s (+9.3% 🔺)5.349s (+3.2%)0.428s62.71x
💻 LocalExpress5.499s (-2.7%)6.214s (+3.3%)0.716s53.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.535s (+13.5% 🔺)5.797s (+26.3% 🔺)2.261s61.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.951s (-33.5% 🟢)5.513s (-25.4% 🟢)1.562s61.12x
▲ VercelNitro4.368s (+9.6% 🔺)6.104s (+2.8%)1.736s61.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.199s (-1.5%)2.008s (~)0.809s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.289s (+5.3% 🔺)2.009s (~)0.720s151.08x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.307s (+1.2%)2.007s (~)0.700s151.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.349s (-0.9%)2.006s (~)0.657s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.458s (-5.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.550s151.22x
💻 LocalExpress1.587s (+2.6%)2.007s (~)0.419s151.32x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.356s (-28.1% 🟢)4.014s (-19.9% 🟢)1.658s81.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.775s (-28.5% 🟢)4.260s (-17.6% 🟢)1.485s81.18x
▲ VercelExpress3.065s (+10.2% 🔺)4.878s (+18.3% 🔺)1.813s71.30x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.437s (+6.6% 🔺)2.230s (+3.6%)0.793s141.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.534s (~)2.141s (~)0.608s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.582s (+10.8% 🔺)2.675s (+20.3% 🔺)1.093s121.10x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.943s (-5.4% 🟢)2.292s (-18.9% 🟢)0.349s141.35x
💻 LocalNitro2.132s (+17.7% 🔺)2.591s (+16.5% 🔺)0.459s121.48x
💻 LocalExpress2.387s (+10.8% 🔺)2.918s (+12.5% 🔺)0.530s111.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.924s (-26.1% 🟢)4.803s (-14.4% 🟢)1.879s71.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.955s (-50.8% 🟢)4.728s (-37.3% 🟢)1.773s71.01x
▲ VercelExpress3.141s (-58.4% 🟢)5.306s (-40.3% 🟢)2.166s61.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.595s (-4.5%)3.766s (-12.5% 🟢)2.172s81.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.690s (-18.0% 🟢)3.761s (-9.2% 🟢)2.072s81.06x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)4.109s (+24.6% 🔺)5.013s (+24.9% 🔺)0.904s62.58x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)4.723s (-6.2% 🟢)5.343s (-3.1%)0.620s62.96x
💻 LocalNitro5.876s (+8.2% 🔺)6.418s (+9.7% 🔺)0.542s53.68x
💻 LocalExpress6.316s (+3.6%)6.819s (+3.1%)0.503s53.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express3.333s (-48.9% 🟢)5.237s (-36.0% 🟢)1.903s61.00x
▲ VercelNitro4.018s (-61.0% 🟢)5.716s (-51.8% 🟢)1.697s61.21x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.668s (+42.9% 🔺)6.481s (+33.7% 🔺)1.814s51.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro0.588s (~)1.005s (~)0.417s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.614s (+6.1% 🔺)1.059s (+5.2% 🔺)0.445s571.04x
💻 LocalExpress0.652s (+6.9% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.353s601.11x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.703s (-19.4% 🟢)1.022s (-1.7%)0.318s591.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.732s (+29.2% 🔺)1.129s (+12.2% 🔺)0.397s541.24x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.856s (+6.3% 🔺)1.040s (+3.4%)0.184s581.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.697s (-8.5% 🟢)6.481s (-7.1% 🟢)1.784s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.010s (-5.1% 🟢)6.696s (-0.8%)1.686s91.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)5.418s (+6.4% 🔺)7.228s (+5.5% 🔺)1.810s91.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.339s (-4.5%)2.030s (+1.1%)0.690s451.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.513s (+0.7%)2.006s (~)0.493s451.13x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.604s (+10.8% 🔺)2.132s (+3.9%)0.528s431.20x
💻 LocalExpress1.616s (+6.1% 🔺)2.007s (~)0.391s451.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.676s (-21.3% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.331s451.25x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.968s (+3.0%)2.251s (+8.5% 🔺)0.283s411.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro12.141s (-13.4% 🟢)13.695s (-16.0% 🟢)1.554s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress12.341s (~)14.549s (+2.4%)2.209s71.02x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)13.105s (-20.0% 🟢)15.264s (-15.8% 🟢)2.159s61.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.703s (-1.2%)3.111s (+2.6%)0.408s391.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.806s (+1.7%)3.404s (+8.5% 🔺)0.598s361.04x
💻 LocalNitro3.335s (+3.5%)3.976s (-0.8%)0.641s311.23x
💻 LocalExpress3.419s (+3.0%)4.042s (+0.8%)0.624s301.26x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.625s (-16.6% 🟢)4.042s (-19.3% 🟢)0.417s301.34x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.859s (-0.6%)4.076s (-2.5%)0.217s301.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro23.984s (-22.3% 🟢)25.857s (-21.4% 🟢)1.873s51.00x
▲ VercelExpress24.791s (-9.0% 🟢)27.182s (-5.7% 🟢)2.391s51.03x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)26.311s (-12.0% 🟢)28.173s (-11.5% 🟢)1.862s51.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.240s (-4.6%)1.006s (~)0.767s601.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.297s (-3.5%)1.006s (-1.7%)0.709s601.24x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.363s (+45.0% 🔺)1.022s (+1.6%)0.659s591.51x
💻 LocalNitro0.435s (+9.3% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.569s601.82x
💻 LocalExpress0.444s (+13.4% 🔺)1.005s (~)0.561s601.85x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.551s (-4.6%)1.022s (+1.6%)0.470s592.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.000s (+6.1% 🔺)3.453s (-16.4% 🟢)1.453s181.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.020s (-11.6% 🟢)3.965s (+1.1%)1.945s161.01x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)2.085s (-15.6% 🟢)3.906s (-4.1%)1.821s161.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.391s (-7.3% 🟢)1.028s (-3.4%)0.638s881.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.470s (+12.5% 🔺)1.053s (+1.2%)0.583s861.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.562s (+1.7%)1.066s (+1.2%)0.504s851.44x
💻 LocalExpress2.144s (-0.9%)2.737s (+0.8%)0.593s335.49x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.284s (-6.5% 🟢)2.977s (-6.5% 🟢)0.693s315.85x
💻 LocalNitro2.295s (+8.3% 🔺)2.912s (+9.6% 🔺)0.617s315.87x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express2.518s (-9.1% 🟢)4.300s (+0.7%)1.782s211.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.698s (~)4.162s (-6.3% 🟢)1.464s221.07x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)3.065s (+6.4% 🔺)4.810s (+8.8% 🔺)1.745s191.22x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.763s (-9.1% 🟢)1.270s (-16.5% 🟢)0.507s951.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.830s (+2.2%)1.366s (-13.9% 🟢)0.536s881.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.700s (+4.0%)3.575s (+3.9%)0.875s343.54x
💻 LocalNitro9.704s (+3.8%)10.111s (+1.6%)0.408s1212.72x
💻 LocalExpress9.919s (+1.2%)10.446s (+0.8%)0.526s1213.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s (+5.0% 🔺)11.577s (+5.0%)0.921s1113.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Express6.128s (-22.0% 🟢)7.798s (-15.6% 🟢)1.670s161.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.371s (~)7.949s (-5.1% 🟢)1.578s161.04x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)6.568s (-14.7% 🟢)8.365s (-10.3% 🟢)1.797s151.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.162s (-0.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (-7.7% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.850s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.163s (~)2.005s (~)0.011s (+6.1% 🔺)2.017s (~)0.854s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.168s (-3.3%)2.003s (~)0.010s (-2.9%)2.017s (~)0.849s101.01x
💻 LocalExpress1.171s (~)2.005s (~)0.013s (+2.4%)2.020s (~)0.849s101.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.228s (-3.7%)2.001s (~)0.001s (+10.0% 🔺)2.010s (~)0.783s101.06x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.273s (+9.0% 🔺)1.991s (~)0.011s (+660.0% 🔺)2.052s (+2.1%)0.779s101.10x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.486s (+18.8% 🔺)3.711s (+23.9% 🔺)0.847s (-26.9% 🟢)4.965s (+9.1% 🔺)2.479s101.00x
▲ VercelNitro2.562s (-21.7% 🟢)3.764s (-18.4% 🟢)0.852s (+25.7% 🔺)5.158s (-11.2% 🟢)2.596s101.03x
▲ VercelExpress2.716s (+2.8%)4.004s (+9.2% 🔺)0.568s (-37.9% 🟢)5.270s (+5.9% 🔺)2.554s101.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.576s (-1.7%)2.007s (~)0.005s (~)2.026s (~)0.450s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.578s (~)2.011s (~)0.012s (-16.4% 🟢)2.024s (~)0.447s301.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.589s (-0.5%)2.010s (~)0.013s (+6.4% 🔺)2.025s (~)0.436s301.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.628s (-6.6% 🟢)2.009s (~)0.014s (+10.9% 🔺)2.026s (~)0.399s301.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.761s (~)2.010s (~)0.005s (-1.3%)2.025s (~)0.264s301.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.006s (+26.0% 🔺)2.395s (+19.5% 🔺)0.004s (-18.1% 🟢)2.446s (+20.7% 🔺)0.439s251.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)6.178s (-4.6%)7.431s (-3.3%)0.206s (+26.3% 🔺)8.158s (-1.7%)1.980s81.00x
▲ VercelNitro6.448s (+4.7%)8.058s (+2.0%)0.155s (-18.2% 🟢)8.655s (+0.7%)2.208s71.04x
▲ VercelExpress6.540s8.098s0.219s8.772s2.232s71.06x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.700s (-11.7% 🟢)1.029s (-1.8%)0.000s (-1.7%)1.042s (-2.4%)0.341s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.060s (+5.0%)1.581s (+8.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)1.588s (+8.7% 🔺)0.528s381.51x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.212s (+58.9% 🔺)1.681s (+63.3% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)1.724s (+64.0% 🔺)0.512s351.73x
💻 LocalNitro1.394s (-1.7%)2.013s (~)0.000s (+20.0% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.621s301.99x
💻 LocalExpress1.416s (+2.6%)2.014s (~)0.000s (+66.7% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.600s302.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.419s (-5.7% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.000s (-7.7% 🟢)2.016s (~)0.597s302.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)2.686s (-40.0% 🟢)3.822s (-34.2% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)4.294s (-31.0% 🟢)1.608s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress2.898s (+2.1%)4.249s (+3.1%)0.000s (NaN%)4.799s (+4.8%)1.901s131.08x
▲ VercelNitro2.914s (-12.9% 🟢)4.173s (-10.8% 🟢)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)4.591s (-11.3% 🟢)1.676s141.09x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.766s (+8.3% 🔺)2.306s (+7.8% 🔺)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.337s (+7.0% 🔺)0.571s261.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)2.248s (+13.5% 🔺)2.776s (+15.6% 🔺)0.000s (+13.6% 🔺)2.782s (+15.5% 🔺)0.535s221.27x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.546s (+57.5% 🔺)3.161s (+47.8% 🔺)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)3.204s (+48.9% 🔺)0.658s191.44x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.908s (-3.3%)3.553s (+0.8%)0.000s (-32.6% 🟢)3.556s (+0.8%)0.648s171.65x
💻 LocalNitro3.042s (-1.2%)3.775s (~)0.001s (+44.4% 🔺)3.780s (~)0.738s161.72x
💻 LocalExpress3.128s (-2.4%)3.901s (-3.2%)0.000s (-40.3% 🟢)3.904s (-3.2%)0.776s161.77x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.346s (-2.7%)5.557s (-9.6% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.013s (-10.1% 🟢)1.667s101.00x
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)4.351s (-20.0% 🟢)5.807s (-15.3% 🟢)0.004s (+1520.0% 🔺)6.281s (-13.9% 🟢)1.929s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress5.033s (-12.0% 🟢)6.381s (-6.8% 🟢)0.000s (NaN%)6.856s (-5.6% 🟢)1.824s91.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalNitro12/21
🐘 PostgresNitro18/21
▲ VercelNitro9/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres13/21
Next.js (Turbopack)💻 Local11/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
✅ ▲ Vercel Production138702191606
✅ 💻 Local Development182502192044
✅ 📦 Local Production182502192044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres181102332044
✅ 🪟 Windows14600146
✅ 📋 Other84401781022
Total7838010688906

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro120026
✅ example120026
✅ express120026
✅ fastify120026
✅ hono120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack14402
✅ nextjs-webpack14402
✅ nitro120026
✅ nuxt120026
✅ sveltekit13907
✅ vite120026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable121025
✅ express-stable121025
✅ fastify-stable121025
✅ hono-stable121025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary127019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14600
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14600
✅ nitro-stable121025
✅ nuxt-stable121025
✅ sveltekit-stable14006
✅ vite-stable121025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable120026
✅ express-stable120026
✅ fastify-stable120026
✅ hono-stable120026
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary126020
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled14501
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled14501
✅ nitro-stable120026
✅ nuxt-stable120026
✅ sveltekit-stable13907
✅ vite-stable120026
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack14600
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable120026
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-120026
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable121025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-121025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start120026

📋 View full workflow run

@socket-security

socket-securityBot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

DiffPackageSupply Chain
Security
VulnerabilityQualityMaintenanceLicense
Addednpm/​esbuild@​0.28.1911007391100

View full report

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the workspace’s esbuild dependency to ^0.28.1 to address GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr, propagating the bump via the pnpm catalog and updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump esbuild in the pnpm catalog from ^0.27.3 to ^0.28.1.
  • Re-resolve pnpm-lock.yaml to incorporate esbuild@0.28.1 and its platform binaries.
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for @workflow/builders and @workflow/cli.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
pnpm-workspace.yamlUpdates the pnpm catalog to use esbuild: ^0.28.1.
pnpm-lock.yamlUpdates lockfile resolutions to include esbuild@0.28.1 and related dependency graph changes.
.changeset/bump-esbuild-0-28-1.mdAdds a patch changeset for publishable consumers impacted by the bump.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 36 to +38
esbuild:
specifier: ^0.27.3
version: 0.27.7
specifier: ^0.28.1
version: 0.28.1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that 0.27.7 lingers transitively. I tried both remediation paths:

  1. Upgrade the consumers — no upstream release helps yet. vite 7.x pins esbuild: ^0.27.0 and even the latest astro (6.4.6) still pins ^0.27.3, both of which exclude 0.28.x (esbuild treats 0.270.28 as a breaking bump). Only a major vite 8 / astro 6 jump would widen this — too risky for the example workbenches.
  2. Force a pnpm override (esbuild: ^0.28.1) — this does unify everything on 0.28.1, but it breaks @workflow/web's production build: react-router → vite 6.4.1 → esbuild 0.28.1 fails with Transforming destructuring to the configured target environment ... is not supported yet on worker code that 0.27.7 compiles fine. So the override regresses a published, deployed package, and I reverted it.

Given the advisory's exploitable path is Deno-specific (lib/deno/mod.ts; the Node install path already verifies integrity) and the remaining copies are build-time-only dev tooling (vite/astro/fumadocs), the residual risk is negligible. The flagged direct dependency in packages/builders — the subject of the advisory — is on 0.28.1. I've left the transitive copies rather than ship a broken build; they'll clear as vite/astro widen their ranges.

Comment threadpnpm-lock.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +11899 to +11905
hasBin: true

esbuild@0.28.1:
resolution: {integrity: sha512-HrJrvZv5ayxBzPfwphOoNzkzOIIlifzk0KJrGK2c8R4+LKpMtpYLQeUdjnwjWv/LZlkH2laZk+4w78pi99D4Vw==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on the churn — fixed in 991f628. Re-resolving the lockfile now drops esbuild@0.28.0 entirely: nitropack@2.13.4 (which declares esbuild: ^0.28.0) consolidates onto 0.28.1, so only 0.28.1 plus the upstream-pinned 0.27.7 remain.

Minor correction: 0.28.0 wasn't actually orphaned in the prior revision — it was still referenced by nitropack@2.13.4 — but that's moot now that it's gone.

The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 011d482 into mainJun 13, 2026
121 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/esbuild-0.28.1 branch June 13, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport to stable failed for 011d482 due to a workflow error (backport job run).

This is usually an infrastructure problem (e.g. the configured AI model could not be found, an AI Gateway error, or an opencode crash) rather than a merge conflict. Check the job logs linked above for details.

Once the underlying issue is fixed, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

011d482808793e8deb0e8523a9c16af129490ee6

github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
* fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)
Bump the esbuild catalog from ^0.27.3 (resolving 0.27.7) to ^0.28.1 to
resolve the High-severity advisory GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (missing binary
integrity verification before executing downloaded binaries). All
workspace consumers reference esbuild via `catalog:` (@workflow/builders,
@workflow/cli, workbench/example, and the root devDependency), so the
single catalog bump propagates everywhere. Adds a patch changeset for the
two publishable consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(ci): exclude esbuild from minimumReleaseAge gate
The canary E2E jobs run `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` (they mutate
the next dependency), which re-resolves the catalog and hits the 48h
`minimumReleaseAge` gate on the freshly-published esbuild@0.28.1, failing
setup with ERR_PNPM_NO_MATCHING_VERSION. Add esbuild and @esbuild/* to
minimumReleaseAgeExclude (pnpm's recommended fix, consistent with the
existing @vercel/*, @workflow/*, turbo exclusions) so the intended,
catalog-pinned security upgrade resolves under non-frozen installs.
Re-resolving also drops the redundant esbuild@0.28.0 (nitropack@2.13.4
consolidates onto 0.28.1 within its ^0.28.0 range).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranay Prakash <pranay.gp@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2404. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

VaguelySerious pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2026
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2026
…-stable
* origin/stable:
[test] Fix stable e2e hookGetConflict test to use waitForHookState (#2405)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399) (#2401)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395) (#2404)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2026
* origin/main:
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
* origin/main:
Small detail panel cleanup (#2459)
Fix lazy Next workflow HMR (#2438)
Prevent peer dependency-only major bumps (#2437)
fix(changesets): only major-bump peer dependents when out of range (#2439)
Version Packages (beta) (#2428)
otel: explicit traceparent injection + linked-trace mode for bounded per-invocation traces (#2363)
[next] Clarify `serverExternalPackages` warning (#2417)
Add .swc gitignore handling to builder (#2427)
Version Packages (beta) (#2390)
[ci] Increase dev.test.ts cleanup hook timeout (#2416)
[world-vercel] Switch event endpoints to v4 wire format (#2055)
docs: document run idempotency (#2011)
Render attr_set events and run attributes in observability UI (#2393)
[ci] Fix backport job model slug (#2403)
[ci] Comment on PR when backport fails, revert to use opus 4.8 (#2400)
Update queue client to 0.3.1 (#2399)
fix(deps): upgrade esbuild to 0.28.1 (GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr) (#2395)
test: e2e coverage for run-idempotency conflict-handling strategies (#2387)
# Conflicts:
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranaygp@TooTallNate